MadChemist
Platinum Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 3,750
- 2,316
- 940
He wants to spent $2 trillion dollars to modernize America. He says the windows are too porous, the roofing is too old, the streets are too rickety, and the nation must help.
What's another 2 trillion ?
He's already gotten that through once.
We all know we need to update our infra structure.
Moscow Mitch even admits it. He just doesn't want to PAY for it if it means raising taxes on rich people or corporations...who are his REAL constituents
Less than a quarter of this bill goes to infrastructure. The rest is commie wish list BS.
.
Dude, quit being ridiculous. Corporate projects are the same way. Ever heard of "Scope creep"?Really? There's nothing specifying what the funds need to be used for? Then maybe the feds need to contract it out themselves.The only thing that counts is what CHICAGO does with the money and the Chicago DemonCraps always spend it to get the slum vote.I think it's a very sensible idea. What previous administrations and Congresses have done doesn't mean this one will fail. That makes no sense. Nothing new would ever happen under your theory.Because past money has already been siphoned off to other pork.About the plan going through or the pipes being replaced? What makes you think either of these can't happen?Are you that naive?Let's see what happens, if he gets this plan through.You mean a Bullshitting Liberal.Well, it's a bad liberal who wants to correct it, too.I Googled and Liberal Chicago has done nothing to replace their lead pipes.
Bad Liberals.
Liberals have been promising pipe replacement for years.
You've never been involved in federal contracting, have you. Federal strings increase the costs of a project by factors of 2x-4x.
.
OH BOY! Another ignorant commie chimes in. Exactly how many government contracts have you been involved in?
.
Not many.
Private companies don't have unlimited contingencies for stupid.
Scope creep isn't an inefficiency or a quality issue.
Bridges falling....that isn't scope creep.....that is just stupid.
Don't know why you're quoting me and making that comment, I haven't mentioned "scope creep", that was brought up by another kind of creep.
.
My mistake.
Yes, this was intended for the french fry.