Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

[Snookie]

Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.

If they were being paid off then they would work for the fossil fuel interests who have way more money to spend than their opponents.

I'll take the word of scientists against the word of rush limbaugh any day.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists
concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of
geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are
creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey
reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believethat nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis - Forbes

My god, have you lost your mind? This study was done by Canadians.

 

[FJO]

If they were being paid off then they would work for the fossil fuel interests who have way more money to spend than their opponents.

I'll take the word of scientists against the word of rush limbaugh any day.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists
concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of
geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are
creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey
reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believethat nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis - Forbes

My god, have you lost your mind? This study was done by Canadians.

Before you fully display your ignorance and condescension about science and Canadians, let me bring to your attention this:

List of Canadian inventions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Snookie]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

me thinks you watch to much star wars and dont get out and play.

 

[boedicca]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

The biomass of all the ants in the world is greater than the biomass of humans.

Perhaps it's the ants fault...or insects as a whole. They far outweigh humans.

 

[Snookie]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

me thinks you watch to much star wars and dont get out and play.

Do you have any idea of the tremendous energy there is in five billion farts?

 

[tinydancer]

If they were being paid off then they would work for the fossil fuel interests who have way more money to spend than their opponents.

I'll take the word of scientists against the word of rush limbaugh any day.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists
concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of
geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are
creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey
reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believethat nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis - Forbes

My god, have you lost your mind? This study was done by Canadians.

guess who busted the hockey stick?

yuppers.......................waving over here with my home boys

you bettcha.

a canuck busted the assholes.

 

[tinydancer]

Lets check this out... One of the latest.


← Alaska’s Columbia Glacier expected to halt retreat in 2020
An update to US Hurricane Intensity 1900-2012 – no recent trend with hurricane Sandy →



Speak loudly and carry a busted hockey stick



Posted on November 27, 2012 by Guest Blogger

by Walter Starck (in Quadrant Online)

The average temperature for the Earth, or any region or even any specific place is very difficult to determine with any accuracy. At any given time surface air temperatures around the world range over about 100°C. Even in the same place they can vary by nearly that much seasonally and as much as 30°C or more in a day. Weather stations are relatively few and located very irregularly. Well maintained stations with good records going back a century or more can be counted on one’s fingers. Even then only maximum and minimum temperatures or ones at a few particular times of day are usually available. Maintenance, siting, and surrounding land use also all have influences on the temperatures recorded.

The purported 0.7°C of average global warming over the past century is highly uncertain. It is in fact less than the margin of error in our ability to determine the average temperature anywhere, much less globally. What portion of any such warming might be due to due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions is even less certain. There are, however, numerous phenomena which are affected by temperature and which can provide good evidence of relative warming or cooling and, in some cases, even actual temperatures.

These include growth rings in trees, corals and stalactites, borehole temperature profiles and the isotopic and biologic signatures in core samples from sediments or glaciers. In addition, historical accounts of crops grown, harvest times, freezes, sea ice, river levels, glacial advances or retreats and other such records provide clear indication of warming and cooling.

Speak loudly and carry a busted hockey stick | Watts Up With That?

 

[tinydancer]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

The biomass of all the ants in the world is greater than the biomass of humans.

Perhaps it's the ants fault...or insects as a whole. They far outweigh humans.

Oh I so love that. Well done.

I hate it when I can't give out rep because I've given out too much.

I hope I remember to rep you for this one.

 

[tinydancer]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

me thinks you watch to much star wars and dont get out and play.

Do you have any idea of the tremendous energy there is in five billion farts?

And?

 

[Snookie]

Five billion people on this planet and it has nothing to do with climate change? Amazing.

The biomass of all the ants in the world is greater than the biomass of humans.

Perhaps it's the ants fault...or insects as a whole. They far outweigh humans.

Ants don't fart.



Much.

 

[RollingThunder]

What excuse are the members of the AGW cult going to use now to impose global socialism on us?

/thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/16372-climate-theories-crumble-as-data-and-experts-suggest-global-cooling]Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

So-called global-warming alarmists are in a frenzy after the latest climate data confirmed the Earth actually appears to be entering a potential cooling trend, sea-ice cover in Antarctica is growing to record levels, tornadoes and hurricanes are at record lows, and more. According to experts, the most recent revelations continue to make a mockery of alarmist claims — debunking United Nations theories about human-caused global warming and the wildly inaccurate supposed “climate models” used to forecast doom and gloom by forces seeking carbon taxes and more centralized government.

Proponents of what is known as “anthropogenic global warming” theories, which claim that human activity is to blame for alleged warming, have long warned that increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would lead to “catastrophic” warming. The problem is that even based on data gathered by the planet’s premier climate alarmists — the U.K. Met Office, for example, or various U.S. agencies — shows that global warming stopped more than a decade and a half ago, as The New American reported last year.

Now, a leaked version of the upcoming UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report highlighted in the media suggests that the global body’s “climate scientists” are struggling hard to publicly explain the lack of warming they predicted with such confidence. Among the possible explanations offered by the UN’s supposed experts: “ash from volcanoes,” a “decline in heat from the sun,” or more heat being “absorbed by the deep oceans,” according to news reports.​

LOLOLOLOL......you denier cult retards are so hilarious with your deranged fantasies.....actually, as the real scientists affirm, global warming is still accelerating....and your sources....LOLOL....a rightwingnut political magazine???....LOLOL.....you are such gullible fools....

 

[Snookie]

me thinks you watch to much star wars and dont get out and play.

Do you have any idea of the tremendous energy there is in five billion farts?

And?

And, not counting wet farts.

 

[skookerasbil]

Well here is more k00k losing..........

RECORD LOW START TO HURRICANE SEASON >>>>

Slowest Start To A Hurricane Season On Record | Real Science



How many times do these jackasses have to be wrong before they realize that climate has a zero level of predicatability. ZERO.

They've fucked up on snow....on tornados......on floods......on temperature.........on hurricanes. They are wrong ALL THE FUCKING TIME!! And they still buy the climate science predictions hook, line and stinker. These people are hysterical mental cases.

The models are wrong | Behind The Black




The climate models are good for adding to our understanding of the environment........they have zero application for predicting future climate......unless you are a mental case.

[/URL][/IMG]

 

[Snookie]

Well here is more k00k losing..........

RECORD LOW START TO HURRICANE SEASON >>>>

Slowest Start To A Hurricane Season On Record | Real Science



How many times do these jackasses have to be wrong before they realize that climate has a zero level of predicatability. ZERO.

They've fucked up on snow....on tornados......on floods......on temperature.........on hurricanes. They are wrong ALL THE FUCKING TIME!! And they still buy the climate science predictions hook, line and stinker. These people are hysterical mental cases.

The models are wrong | Behind The Black




The climate models are good for adding to our understanding of the environment........they have zero application for predicting future climate......unless you are a mental case.

[/URL][/IMG]

That's because Pat Robertson of the CBN has prayed them away this season. Praise the Lord.

 

[bripat9643]

Well here is more k00k losing..........

RECORD LOW START TO HURRICANE SEASON >>>>

Slowest Start To A Hurricane Season On Record | Real Science



How many times do these jackasses have to be wrong before they realize that climate has a zero level of predicatability. ZERO.

They've fucked up on snow....on tornados......on floods......on temperature.........on hurricanes. They are wrong ALL THE FUCKING TIME!! And they still buy the climate science predictions hook, line and stinker. These people are hysterical mental cases.

The models are wrong | Behind The Black

The climate models are good for adding to our understanding of the environment........they have zero application for predicting future climate......unless you are a mental case.

However, they are getting real good at making excuses for their failures.

 

[skookerasbil]

Well here is more k00k losing..........

RECORD LOW START TO HURRICANE SEASON >>>>

Slowest Start To A Hurricane Season On Record | Real Science



How many times do these jackasses have to be wrong before they realize that climate has a zero level of predicatability. ZERO.

They've fucked up on snow....on tornados......on floods......on temperature.........on hurricanes. They are wrong ALL THE FUCKING TIME!! And they still buy the climate science predictions hook, line and stinker. These people are hysterical mental cases.

The models are wrong | Behind The Black

The climate models are good for adding to our understanding of the environment........they have zero application for predicting future climate......unless you are a mental case.

However, they are getting real good at making excuses for their failures.

would certainly explain this............



Global surveys show environmental concerns rank low among public concerns



And in a Pew poll from Feb this year, out of 25 concerns, global warming wasn't even on the list.

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[skookerasbil]

Green issues rank low on campaign trail

 

[skookerasbil]

Poll: Global warming and taxing the rich rank low on voters' radar | The Daily Caller







Like I keep saying............nobody cares.