Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

Don't know if the leak is true, but I've been posting about the growing ice in the antarctic for many years now.

One side is shrinking the other is growing.

in other words - change is NORMAL .

which is a reality.

but normalcy won't provide billions of dollars :eusa_whistle:
 
What excuse are the members of the AGW cult going to use now to impose global socialism on us?

Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling


So-called global-warming alarmists are in a frenzy after the latest climate data confirmed the Earth actually appears to be entering a potential cooling trend, sea-ice cover in Antarctica is growing to record levels, tornadoes and hurricanes are at record lows, and more. According to experts, the most recent revelations continue to make a mockery of alarmist claims — debunking United Nations theories about human-caused global warming and the wildly inaccurate supposed “climate models” used to forecast doom and gloom by forces seeking carbon taxes and more centralized government.

Proponents of what is known as “anthropogenic global warming” theories, which claim that human activity is to blame for alleged warming, have long warned that increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would lead to “catastrophic” warming. The problem is that even based on data gathered by the planet’s premier climate alarmists — the U.K. Met Office, for example, or various U.S. agencies — shows that global warming stopped more than a decade and a half ago, as The New American reported last year.

Now, a leaked version of the upcoming UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report highlighted in the media suggests that the global body’s “climate scientists” are struggling hard to publicly explain the lack of warming they predicted with such confidence. Among the possible explanations offered by the UN’s supposed experts: “ash from volcanoes,” a “decline in heat from the sun,” or more heat being “absorbed by the deep oceans,” according to news reports.

Another Ice Age?

Monday, June 24, 1974 ...:eusa_whistle:

The Earth is going to do what it does. WE are nothing but fleas on the back of a dog relatively...and if we were to disappear tomorrow? The Earth wouldn't miss us, nor care.
 
Do you people have a temperature data set? I'm not about ready to go up against 90% of science to agree with this. lol

That's right Matthew, just accept whatever you are told, never question it, never practice skepticism, never look under the surface for the truth, after all we all know that's really how good science is practiced and how human reason overcomes superstition. :rolleyes:

"Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth." -- Albert Einstein

Have mercy. I believe he is a new convert.

We have to deprogram him.

:lol:

he is young and brainwashed in the cult of "science".

he does not know that the field of "science" ( which does not exist as a uniform field, but the worshipers don't know that) is as corrupt as everything else under the sun.

I would let the worshipers figure it out - why.

The answer is based on scientific proof only :D
 
Well ladies and gentlemen, we've been studying climate change for a long time and we know you pesky little people on earth are the problem......................

For a Century we've studied this and We know our chit...........

Pssssst.............The Earth's been around for a hell of a lot longer than that. Don't talk about that. Keep it hush..............................

actually the precise studies which could be taken into account are available from 1979 only.

would let "science" worshipers figure out why themselves as well ;)
 
May I quote the great one? No. Not Mark Levin...hehehe...

I urge you to bear in mind the imperfection of our current knowledge.

Science is never finished.

It proceeds by successive approximations, edging closer and closer to a complete and accurate understanding of nature, but it is never fully there.

From the fact that so many major discoveries have been made in the last century – even in the last decade – it is clear that we still have far to go.

Science is always subject to debate, correction, refinement, agonizing reappraisal, and revolutionary insights.

Nevertheless, there now seems to be enough known to reconstruct some of the key steps that led to us and helped to make us who we are.


– Carl Sagan


Here endeth the lesson for anyone who tries to tell me the "science is in".

Saganist: Science is never finished

Tiny Dancer, if you ever come to Long Island, I want to show you my "guns." ! :redface:
 
What excuse are the members of the AGW cult going to use now to impose global socialism on us?

Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

So-called global-warming alarmists are in a frenzy after the latest climate data confirmed the Earth actually appears to be entering a potential cooling trend, sea-ice cover in Antarctica is growing to record levels, tornadoes and hurricanes are at record lows, and more. According to experts, the most recent revelations continue to make a mockery of alarmist claims — debunking United Nations theories about human-caused global warming and the wildly inaccurate supposed “climate models” used to forecast doom and gloom by forces seeking carbon taxes and more centralized government.

Proponents of what is known as “anthropogenic global warming” theories, which claim that human activity is to blame for alleged warming, have long warned that increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would lead to “catastrophic” warming. The problem is that even based on data gathered by the planet’s premier climate alarmists — the U.K. Met Office, for example, or various U.S. agencies — shows that global warming stopped more than a decade and a half ago, as The New American reported last year.

Now, a leaked version of the upcoming UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report highlighted in the media suggests that the global body’s “climate scientists” are struggling hard to publicly explain the lack of warming they predicted with such confidence. Among the possible explanations offered by the UN’s supposed experts: “ash from volcanoes,” a “decline in heat from the sun,” or more heat being “absorbed by the deep oceans,” according to news reports.​
The right can always find a few "scientists for hire" who will swear to anything. Remember those who testified that tobacco was harmless?
 
.... and at one point 100% of scientists believed that the sun revolved around the Earth, one scientist stood up to the powers that be, disagreed and was ostracized for it. Men and Women of reason are interested in finding the truth, automatons of propaganda are only interested in being told what to believe.

The fact of the matter is that this whole climate change imbroglio has been so warped by government intervention, political agendas and emotionalism that it makes the science practiced during the Spanish Inquisition look almost pure by comparison.


Bingo.

It's impossible for a reasonable, curious person to be certain on this issue when the two "sides" can't even agree on the data, when political agendas are being pursued, and when emotions are distorting rationality.

In other words, egos are now on the line, so out goes the logic.

.

egos are ALWAYS on the line if one wants to look into the history of scientists...

ego was the reason Galileo was ostracized, not his theory ( which was never a problem)
 
Has anyone seen the latest shit Gore is spewing?

Hurricane predictors are going thru the roof attacking him. The moron is claiming, yes the Gore moron is claiming that they have added a level 6 to hurricanes because of climate change.

Holy toledo. On the bright side they are freaking out in the science world saying that old Al is going off the rails again.

Al Gore is a Category 7 Moron

I disagree. He is a grade 8 jerk, but not a moron.

He managed to make billions on a total lie.

It's BRILLIANT
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.

don't engage in a discussion with a religious worshiper.

he does not even know what "science" is, therefore the kneeling pose and bows.

the more illiterate on the subject, the more awe in approach :lol:
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.

If they were being paid off then they would work for the fossil fuel interests who have way more money to spend than their opponents.

I'll take the word of scientists against the word of rush limbaugh any day.
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.

don't engage in a discussion with a religious worshiper.

he does not even know what "science" is, therefore the kneeling pose and bows.

the more illiterate on the subject, the more awe in approach :lol:

Stupid is claiming that science is a religion.
 
I am appalled at the non believers of science here calling science bad names.

Do you people have any idea how stupid that makes you look? Never mind, you are proud of it.
Who is a non belever in Science?
most of the posters in this thread feel they are paid off and hyper bowling climate change.

If they were being paid off then they would work for the fossil fuel interests who have way more money to spend than their opponents.

I'll take the word of scientists against the word of rush limbaugh any day.


Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists
concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of
geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are
creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey
reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believethat nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis - Forbes
 

Forum List

Back
Top