CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

I thought this article was interesting!

CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

I've had it with climate science.
Damn you ALARMISTS are NUTS!!!
And don't try to claim YOU are not the ALARMISTS!!!
From your OWN link:

"The leaders and pseudo-scientists of climate alarmism are driven by many motives. Fear of just punishment is quickly becoming the leading motive, as it should be. Their crimes start with tax evasion, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, inflicting economic damage on the order of trillions of dollars, include an attempt to murder millions of Americans by shutting down the national energy infrastructure, and possibly include high treason. It is likely that they hide the truth even from their nominal party leaders – Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. That makes the current situation even more dangerous and unpredictable."
 
I thought this article was interesting!

CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

I've had it with climate science.
Damn you ALARMISTS are NUTS!!!
And don't try to claim YOU are not the ALARMISTS!!!
From your OWN link:

"The leaders and pseudo-scientists of climate alarmism are driven by many motives. Fear of just punishment is quickly becoming the leading motive, as it should be. Their crimes start with tax evasion, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, inflicting economic damage on the order of trillions of dollars, include an attempt to murder millions of Americans by shutting down the national energy infrastructure, and possibly include high treason. It is likely that they hide the truth even from their nominal party leaders – Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. That makes the current situation even more dangerous and unpredictable."
LoL....nobody cares s0n
 
I thought this article was interesting!

CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

I've had it with climate science.
/----/ And even more proof of the scam known as Global Warming: SPIN THIS AWAY LIBTARDS.
NOAA Data Tampering Approaching 2.5 Degrees
Posted on March 20, 2018 by tonyheller
NOAA’s US temperature record shows that US was warmest in the 1930’s and has generally cooled as CO2 has increased. This wrecks greenhouse gas theory, so they “adjust” the data to make it look like the US is warming.
NOAA Data Tampering Approaching 2.5 Degrees | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
Oh the mental cases just dismiss information like this....like it doesn't exist. But 30 million people saw it on DRUDGE yesterday which means it resonates with people who are informed. Every green candidate that ran in the 2016 mid-yerms got clobbered...despite 85 million from Tom Stryer. Lol....the people get it with the bogus data.
I am guessing there are fewer warmers today living on the east coast, after three consecutive nor'easters....IN MARCH.

LMFAO!
/----/ Ahhhh Spring is in the air
1234.png
 
I thought this article was interesting!

CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History

I've had it with climate science.
Damn you ALARMISTS are NUTS!!!
And don't try to claim YOU are not the ALARMISTS!!!
From your OWN link:

"The leaders and pseudo-scientists of climate alarmism are driven by many motives. Fear of just punishment is quickly becoming the leading motive, as it should be. Their crimes start with tax evasion, theft of hundreds of billions of dollars, inflicting economic damage on the order of trillions of dollars, include an attempt to murder millions of Americans by shutting down the national energy infrastructure, and possibly include high treason. It is likely that they hide the truth even from their nominal party leaders – Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. That makes the current situation even more dangerous and unpredictable."
LoL....nobody cares s0n
And you are definitely a nobody!
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
 
Can you imagine had Hillary won????? How much freedom, resources and wealth she would have sacrificed to her "Fake Science"

Thank G-d for Uncle Vlad!!!! Savior of the American Republic!!!

Democracy dies with Progressive Leadership
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report

 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.

Yes Honey Boo Boo. The Interview from which that came was in his capacity as as head of the IPCC.

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'

"Such was originally published by Germany's NZZ Online Sunday, and reprinted in English by the Global Warming Policy Foundation moments ago:

(NZZ AM SONNTAG): The new thing about your proposal for a Global Deal is the stress on the importance of development policy for climate policy. Until now, many think of aid when they hear development policies.

(OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL): That will change immediately if global emission rights are distributed. If this happens, on a per capita basis, then Africa will be the big winner, and huge amounts of money will flow there. This will have enormous implications for development policy. And it will raise the question if these countries can deal responsibly with so much money at all..."
 
The IPCC said that Climate change is a wealth redistribution scam that has nothing to do with science
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.

Did you read the interview in his capacity as co-chair of the IPCC?
 
The Weather Channel was always a proponent of the theory of global warming and now a brief look shows that the W.C. is rather embarrassed about the winter storms in the spring and reluctant to give out the statistics relating to the 20 degree drop in average temperature in the East and record snow. The W.C. even revised the average Cherry Blossom date in Washington to April while the average is actually around March 22.
 
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.

Yes Honey Boo Boo. The Interview from which that came was in his capacity as as head of the IPCC.

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'
"Such was originally published by Germany's NZZ Online Sunday, and reprinted in English by the Global Warming Policy Foundation moments ago:
LIAR!
Nowhere in that interview is he speaking for the IPCC, but you knew that already. He is just giving his OPINION.

And newsbusters are known liars and the Global Warming Policy Foundation are a denier think tank, so their translation is suspect.
 
Link to the actual IPCC saying that and not someone vaguely associated with them giving an opinion.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.

Did you read the interview in his capacity as co-chair of the IPCC?
Again, nowhere in the interview did he say he was speaking for the IPCC, as you well know. The IPCC was never mentioned and he was clearly just giving HIS opinion.
 
"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..." Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So it is an opinion of one individual and NOT any actual IPCC repoprt.

That "one individual" was speaking in his capacity as running the IPCC.

Otto Edenhofer, co-chair of the IPCC's Working Group III, a lead author of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
So you have no link to him saying that in his official capacity in the IPCC. No surprise there. And no link to that quote appearing in the IPCC's 4th report you keep parroting, so it is STILL an out of context quote by an individual and nothing the IPCC "said" as you have originally lied about.
Thank you.

Yes Honey Boo Boo. The Interview from which that came was in his capacity as as head of the IPCC.

UN IPCC Official Admits 'We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy'
"Such was originally published by Germany's NZZ Online Sunday, and reprinted in English by the Global Warming Policy Foundation moments ago:
LIAR!
Nowhere in that interview is he speaking for the IPCC, but you knew that already. He is just giving his OPINION.

And newsbusters are known liars and the Global Warming Policy Foundation are a denier think tank, so their translation is suspect.

He was interviewed as Chair of the IPCC

OMG!

Can you not read English
 

Forum List

Back
Top