Dubya
Senior Member
- Dec 29, 2012
- 3,056
- 59
- 48
how is this paper not peer reviewed and published?
I don't know, were the rest of the peers idiots like Anthony Watts?
is that some sort of sad joke? like the pal reviewers that let Gergis et al through review only to get demolished once it was released?
the one thing about skeptical papers is that you know they have been picked over with a fine tooth comb before they get published.
Where is the link for the report? Their kind would just make up names and numbers.