Clarence Thomas is a hero to many Blacks for not caving to the hate Whitey crowd.... A huge hero

Thomas is not a free man with a free mind. He's the exact opposite.
Why because he was born black? What the hell makes you think that he owes you anything at all just because he has black skin? So you want to make a slave out of him....make him tow your mark of expectations. He's not allowed to exercise free will? Wow.....you make a pretty good slave owner.
 
The quota was 100 percent white before Thurgood Marshall. And Thomas wasn't the best available justice at that or any other time. But he was the best available bootlicker.
We were a great country before Thurgood Marshall. We were the envy of the world. All the immigrants wanted to come here.
 
Why because he was born black? What the hell makes you think that he owes you anything at all just because he has black skin? So you want to make a slave out of him....make him tow your mark of expectations. He's not allowed to exercise free will? Wow.....you make a pretty good slave owner.
He left the plantation.
 
Judge Thomas is amazing!:clap2:


He is the best Supreme Court Justice in US history.
Could be. People on here like to play the Scalia switch,they ignore actual rulings and say that S. was witty, well-spoken, princiipled --- but he wasn't half the Constitution mind that Thomas is.

So in the gay marriage wranglings he knew the pervesion but he couldn't make a Natural Law case like Thomas could

Even Robets saw the perversion of it all but didn't have the Natural Law wherewithal to counter it

“Although the majority randomly inserts the adjective ‘two’ in various places, it offers no reason at all why the two-person element of the core definition of marriage may be preserved while the man-woman element may not. Indeed, from the standpoint of history and tradition, a leap from opposite-sex marriage to same-sex marriage is much greater than one from a two-person union to plural unions, which have deep roots in some cultures around the world. If the majority is willing to take the big leap, it is hard to see how it can say no to the shorter one.”

But ALito and Thomas saw directly that this would impinge the core rights of most decent folk

"Thomas wrote that the decision, Obergefell v. Hodges, “enables courts and governments to brand religious adherents who believe that marriage is between one man and one woman as bigots, making their religious liberty concerns that much easier to dismiss.”

That is the clear mark of perversion , that anyone who sees two lustful sodomites as two lustful sodomites has to revise what everyone knows to be the case
 

Forum List

Back
Top