Claiming Racism when there is none, is WORSE than Racism...

Claiming Racism when there is none, is WORSE than Racism...

The Left, as their Agenda Fails around EVERY Corner, even with 3/3's Control, have now digressed to Objectively Dishonest claims of "Racism" whenever this President is taken to Task...

Be it his being called a Liar by Joe Wilson, NOT unlike what Harry Reid said about (43) and Refused to Apologize for, or what the DemocRATS did to (43) by Booing and Heckling him in an ACTUAL State of the Union.

There are also the Claims of "Racism" by the Left and their "Free Press" because of Portrayals of Obama as Hitler or the Joker...

ALL of these things were done to (43) FIRST... And were NEVER Considered Racist.

It doesn't even make sense to call someone Racist for Comparing either Bush or Obama to Hitler...

But I assure you, the ENDLESS Comparisons of (43) to a Chimp or a Monkey would CERTAINLY NOT fly in this Political Environment against Barry.

And that's where the REAL Racism is.

The Dishonest Accusers of Racism who themselves have said and done almost ALL of these things to another President, only now to Cry Racism when it is done to theirs because he has Half African Blood in his Veins.

The Peak of this Dishonesty was Maureen Dowd adding "Boy" into "You Lie"... This is EXACTLY how the Left Views this World...

It is why their Actual Racism in Practice, the Bigotry of Low Expectations, is continued to be pushed by DemocRATS and Liberals, even after a "Black Man" as Achieved the Most Powerful Office in the World.

Liberals Assuming Failure on Minorities IS Racist...

Comparing Barry and the DemocRATS actions to what Hitler did, and giving Substance to it, is the Furthest thing from it!

:)

peace...

The ONLY racism we have seen has come from this administration. This country just ELECTED a man that was a 20 YEAR member of a white hating racist--separatist church that hated this country. Then an appointment of Van Jones--(the green jobs) czar that was all for letting out prison felons to do green jobs, that hated whites--& is on video many times for doing so. How much do you OBAMA voters need? Van Jones is on video for praising Hugo Chavez for taking over the media in Venezula & who is also on record for wanting ALL wealth redistribution to feed government?

This is who OBAMA hired to be the GREEN JOBS CZAR.

It's is your face-----:lol:

You voted for it--YOU got it.
 
Last edited:
The OP title is correct, 100%, seeing racism where there is none actually fuels racism, offers excuses to be racist, and creates hate (the primary ingredient for racism) for anything that you put the focus on.

And it's a purposful distraction on the real issues before this country. The Statists have relied too heavily on this straw man to the point that strawman is about to be torn apart. People are sick of the deflection and these politicians using it will pay dearly come November 2010.
 
The OP title is correct, 100%, seeing racism where there is none actually fuels racism, offers excuses to be racist, and creates hate (the primary ingredient for racism) for anything that you put the focus on.

So Carter is worse than Hitler.

Because, seeing racism where it isn't is worse than racism itself.

Carter saw racism where it isn't.

Hiter was a racist.

therefore... Carter is worse than Hitler.

jeezus, and still they wonder why conservatism is dead lol.
 
The OP title is correct, 100%, seeing racism where there is none actually fuels racism, offers excuses to be racist, and creates hate (the primary ingredient for racism) for anything that you put the focus on.

So Carter is worse than Hitler.

Because, seeing racism where it isn't is worse than racism itself.

Carter saw racism where it isn't.

Hiter was a racist.

therefore... Carter is worse than Hitler.

jeezus, and still they wonder why conservatism is dead lol.

:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:
 
The OP title is correct, 100%, seeing racism where there is none actually fuels racism, offers excuses to be racist, and creates hate (the primary ingredient for racism) for anything that you put the focus on.

So Carter is worse than Hitler.

Because, seeing racism where it isn't is worse than racism itself.

Carter saw racism where it isn't.

Hiter was a racist.

therefore... Carter is worse than Hitler.

jeezus, and still they wonder why conservatism is dead lol.

:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.
 
Astoundingly, the OP appears to believe there is no difference between comparing a white man to a monkey and comparing a black man to a monkey. Although admittedly that bit of ignorance seems to be commonplace amongst the rightwingers of today; I've heard it often enough.
 
Astoundingly, the OP appears to believe there is no difference between comparing a white man to a monkey and comparing a black man to a monkey. Although admittedly that bit of ignorance seems to be commonplace amongst the rightwingers of today; I've heard it often enough.

Seems to me that you totally MISSED his point. However judging from this post, and subsequent others made in this thread by you shows that you just don't get it. As to the OP's point? You are on par for proving his point.

Thanks for the contribution.
 
So Carter is worse than Hitler.

Because, seeing racism where it isn't is worse than racism itself.

Carter saw racism where it isn't.

Hiter was a racist.

therefore... Carter is worse than Hitler.

jeezus, and still they wonder why conservatism is dead lol.

:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go less checked, or both.

[/end interuption]
 
Last edited:
:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go less unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

BRAVO! :clap2:
 
:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go less unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

lol, What?! So if Jimmy Carter exaggerated the amount of racism towards Barack Obama it's going to make more people racist? Is it going to make YOU more racist?
 
Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go less unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

lol, What?! So if Jimmy Carter exaggerated the amount of racism towards Barack Obama it's going to make more people racist? Is it going to make YOU more racist?
Or maybe I just don't care about racism all that much any longer. Try reading thoroughly.
 
:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go more unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

Jimmy Carter lived in the south when and where there was REAL racism. The premise of the OP is that overSTATING racism is worse than real racism.

Do you agree with that? Do you agree that the segregation etc in the South 50 or more years ago, in actual deeds, wasn't as bad as exaggerating the amount of racism, in words?
 
Well here's what Freedomworks leader Dick Armey said about racism in America:

"The Bubba vote is there, and it's very real, and it is everywhere. There's an awful lot of people in America, bless their heart, who simply are not emotionally prepared to vote for a black man."


(Dick Armey, 9/3/08)


So is Armey, the latest conservative hero and the force behind the march on Washington, seeing racism where there is none?

Does that thus make him worse than an actual, practicing racist?
 
Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go more unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

Jimmy Carter lived in the south when and where there was REAL racism. The premise of the OP is that overSTATING racism is worse than real racism.

Do you agree with that? Do you agree that the segregation etc in the South 50 or more years ago, in actual deeds, wasn't as bad as exaggerating the amount of racism, in words?
That's a strawman. Read what others have said and when you ask something relevant to what was said - that calls of faux-racism will lead to more racism - we can continue. Strawmen are boring.
 
[interupting troll]

Well, since you've begged: Without calls of faux-racism, racism exists and hate happens yet a just society recognizes it and punishes it. With calls of faux-racism, the human nature reaction to being taken for granted leads to backlash from the innocent and causes racism to either increase or go more unchecked, or both.

[/end interuption]

Jimmy Carter lived in the south when and where there was REAL racism. The premise of the OP is that overSTATING racism is worse than real racism.

Do you agree with that? Do you agree that the segregation etc in the South 50 or more years ago, in actual deeds, wasn't as bad as exaggerating the amount of racism, in words?
That's a strawman. Read what others have said and when you ask something relevant to what was said - that calls of faux-racism will lead to more racism - we can continue. Strawmen are boring.

What does the thread title and the OP say? Segregation in the south is not a strawman of racism. What is wrong with you, exactly?
 
Well here's what Freedomworks leader Dick Armey said about racism in America:

"The Bubba vote is there, and it's very real, and it is everywhere. There's an awful lot of people in America, bless their heart, who simply are not emotionally prepared to vote for a black man."


(Dick Armey, 9/3/08)


So is Armey, the latest conservative hero and the force behind the march on Washington, seeing racism where there is none?

Does that thus make him worse than an actual, practicing racist?

well??? lol
 
Well here's what Freedomworks leader Dick Armey said about racism in America:

"The Bubba vote is there, and it's very real, and it is everywhere. There's an awful lot of people in America, bless their heart, who simply are not emotionally prepared to vote for a black man."


(Dick Armey, 9/3/08)


So is Armey, the latest conservative hero and the force behind the march on Washington, seeing racism where there is none?

Does that thus make him worse than an actual, practicing racist?

well??? lol
Well what? Who the fuck ever said this wasn't racism? You continue with idiotic strawmen.
 
Jimmy Carter lived in the south when and where there was REAL racism. The premise of the OP is that overSTATING racism is worse than real racism.

Do you agree with that? Do you agree that the segregation etc in the South 50 or more years ago, in actual deeds, wasn't as bad as exaggerating the amount of racism, in words?
That's a strawman. Read what others have said and when you ask something relevant to what was said - that calls of faux-racism will lead to more racism - we can continue. Strawmen are boring.

What does the thread title and the OP say? Segregation in the south is not a strawman of racism. What is wrong with you, exactly?
Focus. Here is what you wanted refuted.
The OP title is correct, 100%, seeing racism where there is none actually fuels racism, offers excuses to be racist, and creates hate (the primary ingredient for racism) for anything that you put the focus on.



So Carter is worse than Hitler.

Because, seeing racism where it isn't is worse than racism itself.

Carter saw racism where it isn't.

Hiter was a racist.

therefore... Carter is worse than Hitler.

jeezus, and still they wonder why conservatism is dead lol.

:lol: What an awesome troll post! :lol:

Try refuting it. It's an accurate elaboration of the OP's premise.

I refuted it. Your agrument against KK failed. Now you bring up idiotic strawmen.

If you want to argue something new, say so. Or, are you one of those pussies who can't ever be in error on an anonymous message board?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top