Chuck Norris is insane

Talk of revolution started in the 70's. As the income gap increased, so did talk of revolution. We've about hit our breaking point.

My only question is which will come first, the revolution, or the civil war?
 
Unlike Democrats, Republicans are perfectly capable of accepting the results of a legal election.
Apparently they aren't too happy with legal elections.

:lol: Exactly.

Really? When did WE ever throw a huge national tantrum and try to undermine the Constitutionally-mandated electoral system just because we didn't get the result we wanted? ::waits while the crickets chirp:: Yeah, that's what I thought. But now you lackwits want to claim that we don't accept elections just because we have the gall to criticize the idiot elected, while fully acknowledging that he won fair and square?

Hypocrisy, thy name is liberal.
 
the felons list alone in Florida changed the outcome of the election.

To pretend their was no reason to question the 2000 election is just bullshit.
 
President of Texas... :lol:

Wonder if Bush would let that happen.

Unlike Democrats, Republicans are perfectly capable of accepting the results of a legal election.

I don't think Bush would care...he bought that property in Paraguay for a reason, he knows we're going down and he's got his escape planned. Wonder if Obama has his escape planned?

Russian economists are now saying America will break up into 6 or more smaller countries. It wasn't too long ago that American economists were saying the Soviet Union would break up, and for the same reasons, income gap, debt, etc. Why would we think the Russian economists are wrong when the American economists were right?
 
the felons list alone in Florida changed the outcome of the election.

To pretend their was no reason to question the 2000 election is just bullshit.

To try to pretend that the election was fixed in BUSH'S favor is bullshit. To try to pretend that Gore's Unconstitutional and illegal hissy fit was merely "questioning the election" is just offensively dishonest.

And to then accuse REPUBLICANS of having trouble accepting legal election results is hypocrisy. So if the shoe fits, wear it.
 
the felons list alone in Florida changed the outcome of the election.

To pretend their was no reason to question the 2000 election is just bullshit.

To try to pretend that the election was fixed in BUSH'S favor is bullshit. To try to pretend that Gore's Unconstitutional and illegal hissy fit was merely "questioning the election" is just offensively dishonest.

And to then accuse REPUBLICANS of having trouble accepting legal election results is hypocrisy. So if the shoe fits, wear it.
Gore didn't do anything unconstitutional.

Perhaps you haven't read this thread...it is about a Republican wanting to overthrow the government because he is apparently very unhappy with the outcome of a legal election.
 
I can call you guys party the emo party but that does not make it true.

The Democratic party has control right now and the socialists party has next to no control of anything.

Form over substance fuckwittette. The Dem party has been taken over by socialists. Ergo the comment from IO. Your insistence that this isn't the case makes you look dumb as a post.



No it has not , you just say it has.

You see your party has been taken over by insane people like Rush , Beck and this nut bag Norris. That is the truth and you are proving it by spouting their redicules bullshit and defending them.

Its the democratic party and not the socilaist party. Go to the socialist party sight adn check what they say.

Whatever TM! If the Dems in charge want the same thing as socialists (as distinguished from the Socialist Workers Party of America), then they are socialist. Being a socialist is defined by actions not labels.

The Labour Party of Britain is a socialist party. The SPD in Germany is a socialist party. Just fucking admit it, there's no shame in it, it's just a party. Sack up and admit they are socialists in the Dem party right now. Just be honest.
 
the felons list alone in Florida changed the outcome of the election.

To pretend their was no reason to question the 2000 election is just bullshit.

If Al Gore had requested a recount in the entire state of Florida, instead of just in a few democratic districts where he knew he'd pick up votes, he would have won.

When Carol Roberts announced on live tv something to the effect of "We're not going home until Gore wins" and no one challenged her, or even replayed the little snip, I lost my respect for the media. That election was no more rigged than any other, get over it.

Remember, Gore had thousands of military ballots thrown out and tried to stop the count of republican votes simply because the republican party had been allowed to come in and put numbers on the ballot REQUESTS, and if they hadn't, those people never would have gotten their mail in ballots. Gore cheated and failed. Bush cheated and won.

If the democrats had truly wanted Gore for president, they would have removed Clinton when they got the chance, they knew what would happen (ie loss of the next election). They didn't care. Just think, Gore would have been president for more than 8 years and we probably wouldn't have been in Iraq, and it's all the fault of the democratic party for not removing an unfit man from the presidency in the first place.
 
the felons list alone in Florida changed the outcome of the election.

To pretend their was no reason to question the 2000 election is just bullshit.

To try to pretend that the election was fixed in BUSH'S favor is bullshit. To try to pretend that Gore's Unconstitutional and illegal hissy fit was merely "questioning the election" is just offensively dishonest.

And to then accuse REPUBLICANS of having trouble accepting legal election results is hypocrisy. So if the shoe fits, wear it.
Gore didn't do anything unconstitutional.

Perhaps you haven't read this thread...it is about a Republican wanting to overthrow the government because he is apparently very unhappy with the outcome of a legal election.

Ravi, I didn't see anything about the election. Where were you looking?
 
To try to pretend that the election was fixed in BUSH'S favor is bullshit. To try to pretend that Gore's Unconstitutional and illegal hissy fit was merely "questioning the election" is just offensively dishonest.

And to then accuse REPUBLICANS of having trouble accepting legal election results is hypocrisy. So if the shoe fits, wear it.
Gore didn't do anything unconstitutional.

Perhaps you haven't read this thread...it is about a Republican wanting to overthrow the government because he is apparently very unhappy with the outcome of a legal election.

Ravi, I didn't see anything about the election. Where were you looking?

As usual, Ravi's wrong. This thread is ACTUALLY about the fact that liberals are too eye-rollingly, frothingly insane to recognize when someone's deliberately being absurd to illustrate a point.

Chuck's column was funny. Liberals taking him seriously and wigging out is flipping HILARIOUS!
 
Apparently they aren't too happy with legal elections.

:lol: Exactly.

Really? When did WE ever throw a huge national tantrum and try to undermine the Constitutionally-mandated electoral system just because we didn't get the result we wanted? ::waits while the crickets chirp:: Yeah, that's what I thought. But now you lackwits want to claim that we don't accept elections just because we have the gall to criticize the idiot elected, while fully acknowledging that he won fair and square?

Hypocrisy, thy name is liberal.

Uhm, right now. You and your party are saying they want to overthrow the entire fucking government.
 
To try to pretend that the election was fixed in BUSH'S favor is bullshit. To try to pretend that Gore's Unconstitutional and illegal hissy fit was merely "questioning the election" is just offensively dishonest.

And to then accuse REPUBLICANS of having trouble accepting legal election results is hypocrisy. So if the shoe fits, wear it.
Gore didn't do anything unconstitutional.

Perhaps you haven't read this thread...it is about a Republican wanting to overthrow the government because he is apparently very unhappy with the outcome of a legal election.

Ravi, I didn't see anything about the election. Where were you looking?
I was reading his post on World Net Daily. Revolutions happen in democracies when elections aren't valid, or when the government acts in an unconstitutional manner...and as far as I can tell we haven't had either of those happenings.
 

Really? When did WE ever throw a huge national tantrum and try to undermine the Constitutionally-mandated electoral system just because we didn't get the result we wanted? ::waits while the crickets chirp:: Yeah, that's what I thought. But now you lackwits want to claim that we don't accept elections just because we have the gall to criticize the idiot elected, while fully acknowledging that he won fair and square?

Hypocrisy, thy name is liberal.

Uhm, right now. You and your party are saying they want to overthrow the entire fucking government.

Who said that? Other than you I mean. What was in the article was a question. Will our leaders begin to listen or will things spin so out of control that a revolution is called for.

This is a very Jeffersonian question. Recall Jefferson said "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure."
 
I don't really get this one. If true, why would you be concerning yourself with politics...you should be trying to live a Godly life.


2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.

That's the one that means that if you aren't a fundamentalist christian, get out. You know, American Taliban type stuff. :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top