Christian Conservative Hate Group causes cancellation of Tea Party Rally

The left does label anyone who has a different POV as a hate group. Any voiced opposition to their progressive agenda is labeled as "hate speech" because they want to SHUT DOWN OPPOSITION. They know that if the law accepts someone is using "hate speech" they can prevent them from spreading their view.

It hasn't worked too well for them so far, but in the meantime, the soft-headed actually BELIEVE it and have lost all sense of what freedom means.
 
The message is that homsexuality doesn't need to be promoted to children, from what I can see.

I agree. Children shouldn't be sexualized, period. And they don't need blatant sexual imagery thrown in front of them all the time. From what I read on the site, the gripe is with overt sexual imagery and indoctrination. I didn't read everything, but that's what I got. The objection was to cross dressers in the schools and the gay pride parades, which include children.

They're also lobbying against homosexual marriage. The jury is still out on that one. Honestly, I don't have a problem with homosexual marriage, but the minute the state determines it's a violation of civil rights to NOT grant homosexuals marriage, the state will start telling the churches what they must do. That's my only objection to it.

And I know that's what the pro-marriage lobbyists want. Because homosexuals can already find churches and clergy that will marry them in religious ceremonies.

You clearly do not understand civil marriage equality issues. We are talking about civil marriage. It has nothing to do with Churches.

Gay people are not trying to shut down Churches.

Actually, it's all about shutting down churches. You just don't see all the players on the board.

Bull Puckie.
 
What's anti-gay about not wanting sexuality promoted to children?

I get so tired of being labeled as a hater for not approving of open promotion of homosexuality.

I get so tired of being labeled as a liberal for not approving of the current crop of Republicans, Rush Limbaugh, the Tea Party, neo-conservatives, racists, homophobes, social conservatives, Fox 'News' and all the hypocrites, RW liars and posters of idiotgrams I've neglected to mention.
 
I asked stephanie to put the message of MassResistance in CONTEXT with the controversy over Racism.

And of course racism and homosexuality have absolutely nothing to do with one another. So there is no context.

Nor have you proved that this speaker was going to talk about his platform for MassResistance. You have no clue what he was going to say. You have no idea what he was invited to say.

Context matters. But I suppose it's convenient to forget about it.

Perception matters as well.

The reason this event was canceled was because a few of the other speakers did not want to be linked to the message of MassResistance. Whether or not Mr. Camenker spoke about homosexuality, you can bet that when this event was concluded, Dahlberg's opponents would have linked him to the message of MassResistance. Others saw things in the same way and decided they were better off not participating in the event. Enough made this decision to cause the event to be canceled.

Immie

Perception is fraud. I am tired of people trying to focus on perception to attack their fellow man and gratify their own pride instead of looking at reality. Image is nothing. It is meaningless. People need to stop letting false images decieve them. It's what creates conflict between people.
 
The message is that homsexuality doesn't need to be promoted to children, from what I can see.

I agree. Children shouldn't be sexualized, period. And they don't need blatant sexual imagery thrown in front of them all the time. From what I read on the site, the gripe is with overt sexual imagery and indoctrination. I didn't read everything, but that's what I got. The objection was to cross dressers in the schools and the gay pride parades, which include children.

They're also lobbying against homosexual marriage. The jury is still out on that one. Honestly, I don't have a problem with homosexual marriage, but the minute the state determines it's a violation of civil rights to NOT grant homosexuals marriage, the state will start telling the churches what they must do. That's my only objection to it.

And I know that's what the pro-marriage lobbyists want. Because homosexuals can already find churches and clergy that will marry them in religious ceremonies.

You clearly do not understand civil marriage equality issues. We are talking about civil marriage. It has nothing to do with Churches.

Gay people are not trying to shut down Churches.

Actually, it's all about shutting down churches. You just don't see all the players on the board.
While the state licenses marriage, the church sanctifies marriage. All that is asked is for the state to license marriage for gay couples. It's then up to the church to decide if such marriages may be sanctified within that church.

Just like inter-racial couples could not find every church ready to sanctify their marriage, gay couple will face the same problem. But how many churches today will not sanctify an inter racial marriage? How many churches were "shut down" as a result of inter racial marriage? How has inter racial marriage directly and personally effected you marriage?
 
What's anti-gay about not wanting sexuality promoted to children?

I get so tired of being labeled as a hater for not approving of open promotion of homosexuality.

I get so tired of being labeled as a liberal for not approving of the current crop of Republicans, Rush Limbaugh, the Tea Party, neo-conservatives, racists, homophobes, social conservatives, Fox 'News' and all the hypocrites, RW liars and posters of idiotgrams I've neglected to mention.

You're labeled as liberal because you active promote liberal/progressive policies. Not because you opposite conservatives.
 
And of course racism and homosexuality have absolutely nothing to do with one another. So there is no context.

Nor have you proved that this speaker was going to talk about his platform for MassResistance. You have no clue what he was going to say. You have no idea what he was invited to say.

Context matters. But I suppose it's convenient to forget about it.
The context is bigotry and prejudice. Ever consider them? I read through the MassResistance website and found nothing other than anti-Gay screeds. Why should we guess that a movement with MassResistance's agenda would have something enlightening to say about the marginal tax rates of people making greater than $250,000?

Seems MassResistance has cut it's own bolt of cloth here and the message is social not fiscal.

Then you concede there is absolutely nothing Christian about their agenda and labeling them a Christian group would be dishonest correct?
Find any of my posts in which I called MassResistance "Christian". Please post a complete list.
 
You clearly do not understand civil marriage equality issues. We are talking about civil marriage. It has nothing to do with Churches.

Gay people are not trying to shut down Churches.

Actually, it's all about shutting down churches. You just don't see all the players on the board.
While the state licenses marriage, the church sanctifies marriage. All that is asked is for the state to license marriage for gay couples. It's then up to the church to decide if such marriages may be sanctified within that church.

Just like inter-racial couples could not find every church ready to sanctify their marriage, gay couple will face the same problem. But how many churches today will not sanctify an inter racial marriage? How many churches were "shut down" as a result of inter racial marriage? How has inter racial marriage directly and personally effected you marriage?
'
There you go again, using reason is a sure fire method of killing a thead. Take a lesson from Stephanie, post your emotions - hate, fear work very well; critically thinking drives the seriously emotionally disturbed away and there goes the humor I so enjoy.
 
And of course racism and homosexuality have absolutely nothing to do with one another. So there is no context.

Nor have you proved that this speaker was going to talk about his platform for MassResistance. You have no clue what he was going to say. You have no idea what he was invited to say.

Context matters. But I suppose it's convenient to forget about it.
The context is bigotry and prejudice. Ever consider them? I read through the MassResistance website and found nothing other than anti-Gay screeds. Why should we guess that a movement with MassResistance's agenda would have something enlightening to say about the marginal tax rates of people making greater than $250,000?

Seems MassResistance has cut it's own bolt of cloth here and the message is social not fiscal.

Then you concede there is absolutely nothing Christian about their agenda and labeling them a Christian group would be dishonest correct?

Their agenda is 'family values' which is Christian. You know, groups like the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family.
 
Last edited:
And of course racism and homosexuality have absolutely nothing to do with one another. So there is no context.

Nor have you proved that this speaker was going to talk about his platform for MassResistance. You have no clue what he was going to say. You have no idea what he was invited to say.

Context matters. But I suppose it's convenient to forget about it.

Perception matters as well.

The reason this event was canceled was because a few of the other speakers did not want to be linked to the message of MassResistance. Whether or not Mr. Camenker spoke about homosexuality, you can bet that when this event was concluded, Dahlberg's opponents would have linked him to the message of MassResistance. Others saw things in the same way and decided they were better off not participating in the event. Enough made this decision to cause the event to be canceled.

Immie

Perception is fraud. I am tired of people trying to focus on perception to attack their fellow man and gratify their own pride instead of looking at reality. Image is nothing. It is meaningless. People need to stop letting false images decieve them. It's what creates conflict between people.

Tell that to any politician. I suspect you will be laughed at.

Dahlberg is a politician who wants to win an election... an election in Mass. Being tied to an Anti-gay group could very well spell the end of his career. Whether or not MR is a hate group does not matter. Being tied to that message might very well cost him the election and any further political hopes.

Immie
 
Actually, it's all about shutting down churches. You just don't see all the players on the board.
While the state licenses marriage, the church sanctifies marriage. All that is asked is for the state to license marriage for gay couples. It's then up to the church to decide if such marriages may be sanctified within that church.

Just like inter-racial couples could not find every church ready to sanctify their marriage, gay couple will face the same problem. But how many churches today will not sanctify an inter racial marriage? How many churches were "shut down" as a result of inter racial marriage? How has inter racial marriage directly and personally effected you marriage?
'
There you go again, using reason is a sure fire method of killing a thead. Take a lesson from Stephanie, post your emotions - hate, fear work very well; critically thinking drives the seriously emotionally disturbed away and there goes the humor I so enjoy.
sorry. I'll try to be dumber next time!
 
While the state licenses marriage, the church sanctifies marriage. All that is asked is for the state to license marriage for gay couples. It's then up to the church to decide if such marriages may be sanctified within that church.

Just like inter-racial couples could not find every church ready to sanctify their marriage, gay couple will face the same problem. But how many churches today will not sanctify an inter racial marriage? How many churches were "shut down" as a result of inter racial marriage? How has inter racial marriage directly and personally effected you marriage?
'
There you go again, using reason is a sure fire method of killing a thead. Take a lesson from Stephanie, post your emotions - hate, fear work very well; critically thinking drives the seriously emotionally disturbed away and there goes the humor I so enjoy.
sorry. I'll try to be dumber next time!

boy, you lefties are some of most hateful people who walk this earth.
what happened to all that LOOOOOVE you all preach.:lol:
 
massresistance has been labelled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Do you support them stephanie?
 
You clearly do not understand civil marriage equality issues. We are talking about civil marriage. It has nothing to do with Churches.

Gay people are not trying to shut down Churches.

Actually, it's all about shutting down churches. You just don't see all the players on the board.

You made the claim. Back it up. Link please.

No point, you wouldn't accept it anyway and I need to go to work.
 
What's anti-gay about not wanting sexuality promoted to children?

I get so tired of being labeled as a hater for not approving of open promotion of homosexuality.

I get so tired of being labeled as a liberal for not approving of the current crop of Republicans, Rush Limbaugh, the Tea Party, neo-conservatives, racists, homophobes, social conservatives, Fox 'News' and all the hypocrites, RW liars and posters of idiotgrams I've neglected to mention.

You're labeled as liberal because you active promote liberal/progressive policies. Not because you opposite conservatives.

Forgive me, I forget some here don't understand that 'liberal' is now a pejorative for everything wrong with society. The terms "Liberal and 'liberal' have different definitions depending on context.
I am liberal or progressive or forward looking on many issues, but that does not make me ignorant, stupid, a communist, socialist, marxist or un-American, all meanings attached to the word 'liberal' by those on the RW.
I have opinions which are clearly conservative, but not in the sense I understand the meaning of conservative today. Today's 'conservatives' have morphed into a force motivated by the selfish disregard for their fellow human beings, and the plants and animals which share the earth us.
In fact, the term which best suits them today is not conservative, it is reactionary. A radical believe in tradition, a rejection of science which fits not their opinions, and fear of change.
 
The context is bigotry and prejudice. Ever consider them? I read through the MassResistance website and found nothing other than anti-Gay screeds. Why should we guess that a movement with MassResistance's agenda would have something enlightening to say about the marginal tax rates of people making greater than $250,000?

Seems MassResistance has cut it's own bolt of cloth here and the message is social not fiscal.

Then you concede there is absolutely nothing Christian about their agenda and labeling them a Christian group would be dishonest correct?
Find any of my posts in which I called MassResistance "Christian". Please post a complete list.

Did I ever say you called MassResistance Christian? Forgive me, but I thought you actually read the title of the thread and were familiar with its claim.
 

Forum List

Back
Top