Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Check this out
- Thread starter TNHarley
- Start date
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
Don't be stupid.
The OP is actually the ONLY thing I've been trying to discuss...
What I'm saying is that a claim has been made that the definition has been changed, and that claim is, thus far, completely unsupported...
LOL!!
Beat feet. You're a little girl. You're not burying anyone...
.
I have showed where it has been changed ... You have nothing to offer in argument or rebuttal in that.
Put up ... Which I know you cannot do because I have already proved you cannot ... Or shut up.
You're not going to get anywhere trying to argue your bullshit with me.
.
I have showed where it has been changed ... You have nothing to offer in argument or rebuttal in that.
Put up ... Which I know you cannot do because I have already proved you cannot ... Or shut up.
You're not going to get anywhere trying to argue your bullshit with me.
.
Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
The only reason "climate change" is even an issue is because motherfuckers want more power centralized in the hands of a few in DC.Since their lies always get debunked, they resort to trying to change reality.
Insatiable fuckers. Dishonest and insatiable.
Hopefully the climate changes quick and all those shit stains die the fuck off.
For this reason alone, Texas should immediately secede.
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,516
- 2,288
.
I have showed where it has been changed ... You have nothing to offer in argument or rebuttal in that.
You posted the original definition that the OP claims has been altered?
Sweet. Which post was that?
Put up ... Which I know you cannot do because I have already proved you cannot ... Or shut up.
Why would I do that? I'm not the one making idiotic, wholly unsubstantiated claims...
You're not going to get anywhere trying to argue your bullshit with me.
That's because you're mentally retarded...
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,890
- 54,748
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #45
TXHarley has a good ring to it!The only reason "climate change" is even an issue is because motherfuckers want more power centralized in the hands of a few in DC.
For this reason alone, Texas should immediately secede.
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
You posted the original definition that the OP claims has been altered?
.
Why are you asking me about the OP's reference?
I have supplied you with several references and variations from a wide array of sources,
and you can see where it has been changed and specifically to meet an agenda.
If you want to discuss it with me, I don't need to give you a post number ...
Just look for my post that you then stated you would rather ignore and not address.
Retreating to a failing position is not going to save you ...
.Why are you asking me about the OP's reference?
I have supplied you with several references and variations from a wide array of sources,
and you can see where it has been changed and specifically to meet an agenda.
If you want to discuss it with me, I don't need to give you a post number ...
Just look for my post that you then stated you would rather ignore and not address.
Retreating to a failing position is not going to save you ...
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,516
- 2,288
Why are you asking me about the OP's reference?
Um, because we're discussing what the OP wrote, dummy.
I want to know what HE thinks was changed. Unless you can speak for him, you should probably just shut the fuck up...
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,890
- 54,748
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #48
I have already explained it to you. You just care too much about being obtuse.Um, because we're discussing what the OP wrote, dummy.
I want to know what HE thinks was changed. Unless you can speak for him, you should probably just shut the fuck up...
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
Um, because we're discussing what the OP wrote, dummy.
I want to know what HE thinks was changed. Unless you can speak for him, you should probably just shut the fuck up...
.
He wrote about how sad it is they have to alter the definition to suit an agenda.
Where the hell is Odin ... Send down the Valkyries and get this naked bleeding fucker off my battlefield ...
.He wrote about how sad it is they have to alter the definition to suit an agenda.
Where the hell is Odin ... Send down the Valkyries and get this naked bleeding fucker off my battlefield ...
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,516
- 2,288
I have already explained it to you. You just care too much about being obtuse.
You've failed, numerous times, to quote what the definition was. All you've done is state what it is now, and then you offered an opinion as to why you believe it was changed.
Thus far, there's no reason to believe you when you say it has been changed...
- Sep 27, 2012
- 92,890
- 54,748
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #51
Just shut up already, tard. JesusYou've failed, numerous times, to quote what the definition was. All you've done is state what it is now, and then you offered an opinion as to why you believe it was changed.
Thus far, there's no reason to believe you when you say it has been changed...
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,516
- 2,288
Just shut up already, tard. Jesus
Just fail more nipplehead.
Then again, I don't know that it's possible for a person to be as monumental a failure as you have been. You see, since we're redefining what words mean, it's clear that you've "redfined" what a failure is...
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
You've failed, numerous times, to quote what the definition was. All you've done is state what it is now, and then you offered an opinion as to why you believe it was changed.
Thus far, there's no reason to believe you when you say it has been changed...
.
If the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a staple since 1843, and touted as the "Most Trusted Dictionary".
provides the traditional definition first and foremost with citations ...
Then goes on to add two other definitions under the subtitle of "in current use" citing who knows what as citations for whatever reasons ...
Guess what ... That means that even they are willing to suggest any "current" interpretation isn't what it used to be ... Meaning it has been altered.
It is not necessary for you to come back in here,
and pretend you will accomplish anything by attempting to argue or suggest that it hasn't been altered.
.
If the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a staple since 1843, and touted as the "Most Trusted Dictionary".
provides the traditional definition first and foremost with citations ...
Then goes on to add two other definitions under the subtitle of "in current use" citing who knows what as citations for whatever reasons ...
Guess what ... That means that even they are willing to suggest any "current" interpretation isn't what it used to be ... Meaning it has been altered.
It is not necessary for you to come back in here,
and pretend you will accomplish anything by attempting to argue or suggest that it hasn't been altered.
.
odanny
Diamond Member
.
If the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a staple since 1843, and touted as the "Most Trusted Dictionary".
provides the traditional definition first and foremost with citations ...
Then goes on to add two other definitions under the subtitle of "in current use" citing who knows what as citations for whatever reasons ...
Guess what ... That means that even they are willing to suggest any "current" interpretation isn't what it used to be ... Meaning it has been altered.
It is not necessary for you to come back in here,
and pretend you will accomplish anything by attempting to argue or suggest that it hasn't been altered.
.
You haven't proven anything, and nothing has been "changed", the definition might now include a more specific time frame, as a point of reference, but nothing changed.
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
You haven't proven anything, and nothing has been "changed", the definition might now include a more specific time frame, as a point of reference, but nothing changed.
.
If you attempt to suggest that the timeframe matters ... Then you are only admitting that it has been altered.
Just stop ... You don't even need to try and fight.
You were wrong from the beginning of your statement to the end ... They are inconsistent with each other.
Cognitive Dissonance
.
If you attempt to suggest that the timeframe matters ... Then you are only admitting that it has been altered.
Just stop ... You don't even need to try and fight.
You were wrong from the beginning of your statement to the end ... They are inconsistent with each other.
Cognitive Dissonance
.
Last edited:
odanny
Diamond Member
.
If you attempt to suggest that the timeframe matters ... Then you are only admitting that it has been altered.
Just stop ... You don't even need to try and fight.
.
They didn't alter anything, you idiot. They added something. The definition is the same.
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
They didn't alter anything, you idiot. They added something. The definition is the same.
.
Dude ... If you add something, you alter it,
You are grasping at straws to support a fallacy and failing miserably.
Do yourself a favor and go back to whatever rock you crawled out from under.
.
Dude ... If you add something, you alter it,
You are grasping at straws to support a fallacy and failing miserably.
Do yourself a favor and go back to whatever rock you crawled out from under.
.
odanny
Diamond Member
.
Dude ... If you add something, you alter it,
You are grasping at straws to support a fallacy and failing miserably.
Do yourself a favor and go back to whatever rock you crawled out from under.
.
Except nothing changed. If you want to call it "altered", go ahead.
Altered does not = changed.
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
Except nothing changed. If you want to call it "altered", go ahead.
Altered does not = changed.
.
You are just going to continue to fail ...
Altered
ADJECTIVE
changed in character or composition, typically in a comparatively small but significant way
.
You are just going to continue to fail ...
Altered
ADJECTIVE
changed in character or composition, typically in a comparatively small but significant way
.
Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,516
- 2,288
.
If the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a staple since 1843, and touted as the "Most Trusted Dictionary".
provides the traditional definition first and foremost with citations ...
Then goes on to add two other definitions under the subtitle of "in current use" citing who knows what as citations for whatever reasons ...
Guess what ... That means that even they are willing to suggest any "current" interpretation isn't what it used to be ... Meaning it has been altered.
It is not necessary for you to come back in here,
and pretend you will accomplish anything by attempting to argue or suggest that it hasn't been altered.
.
Fuck you, douche.
The OP cannot state how the definition was changed without providing the original definition which, by his own admission, is something he can't do.
So why would we believe it? Because he said it?
That'd be fuckin' stupid...
Similar threads
- Replies
- 54
- Views
- 637
- Replies
- 169
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 115
- Views
- 3K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 79
- Views
- 463
- Replies
- 45
- Views
- 236
- Replies
- 139
- Views
- 601
- Replies
- 59
- Views
- 338
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 151
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8250
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-