Charlottesville Driver May have Been Panicked into Losing Control of His Car

[Faun]

Or the prosecution might point out that the driver drove his car directly into a crowd of people without appearing to slow or otherwise attempt to avoid hitting any of them.

I don't think that the argument, "The driver didn't try to run over these people, so he must not have been trying to run over those people" is going to be effective.

The driver rear-ended a car blocking his escape path. For anyone not a prejudiced shithead, that won't remove reasonable doubt that he was trying to hurt people, rather than flee. Only a real shithead, that's you, fucktard, find it compelling to believe that he intended to hurt people by proxy of another car, rather than smashing into those soft targets directly.

LOLOL

Even according to you -- his escape route takes him through a mob of people when an actual escape route, behind him, had no one in the street. And according to you, he chooses the route so full of pedestrians, he can't even see the car stopped in the middle of the road

Do you have any idea at all how stupid you sound?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

BulletProof, post: 18985128

The Defense will say that the kid was driving in the middle of the road, never once swerving to hit anyone or anything, as far away from the people on the sides as he could get.

No they won't. You are stupid. There is no other excuse for your post. The defense lawyers presumably are not stupid meaning they are not going to present stupid arguments. Not swerving to hit a few pedestrians has to be right up there as the stupidest argument of all in defense of a wannabe NAZI mass murderer deliberately accelerating his vehicle in a straight line toward the most dense crowd of pedestrians on the road.

 

[BulletProof]

No they won't. You are stupid. There is no other excuse for your post. The defense lawyers presumably are not stupid meaning they are not going to present stupid arguments. Not swerving to hit a few pedestrians has to be right up there as the stupidest argument of all in defense of a wannabe NAZI mass murderer deliberately accelerating his vehicle in a straight line toward the most dense crowd of pedestrians on the road.

It's the job the defense to keep prejudiced fucktards like you off the jury. Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car, where the greatest risk of injury is to himself, not just from the collision, but from the fascist fucktard mob. Too bad you're too stupid to understand.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

BulletProof, post: 18993759

Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car.....

He did not aim at another car. He aimed at people. The most people. The densest mass of people within his sight. Your defense of your NAZI makes a solid case that his intent was to be a mass murderer - a terrorist. A NAZI terrorist.

 

[hadit]

BulletProof, post: 18993759

Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car.....

He did not aim at another car. He aimed at people. The most people. The densest mass of people within his sight. Your defense of your NAZI makes a solid case that his intent was to be a mass murderer - a terrorist. A NAZI terrorist.

You don't need inflammatory names for him. The fact that he not only didn't avoid the crowd but deliberately drove into it means he doesn't walk. Vehicular homicide at the least.

 

[Faun]

No they won't. You are stupid. There is no other excuse for your post. The defense lawyers presumably are not stupid meaning they are not going to present stupid arguments. Not swerving to hit a few pedestrians has to be right up there as the stupidest argument of all in defense of a wannabe NAZI mass murderer deliberately accelerating his vehicle in a straight line toward the most dense crowd of pedestrians on the road.

It's the job the defense to keep prejudiced fucktards like you off the jury. Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car, where the greatest risk of injury is to himself, not just from the collision, but from the fascist fucktard mob. Too bad you're too stupid to understand.

You’re deranged.

Forget for a moment that he couldn’t even see the car he hit until he hit it... why the fuck would he want to hit a car??

 

[NotfooledbyW]

You don't need inflammatory names for him. T

I have no problem with calling a self identified white nationalist, supremist, hater a NAZI.

 

[BulletProof]

Forget for a moment that he couldn’t even see the car he hit until he hit it... why the fuck would he want to hit a car??

So, dumbshit bigot Democrat, you think he was trying to hit people in the road on the other side of the car he couldn't see?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

So, dumbshit bigot Democrat, you think he was trying to hit people in the road on the other side of the car he couldn't see?

You must be a Russian troll. Are you trying to make us intelligent reasonable Americans give up hope by convincing us that about one third of Americans (Trump's hate base) have lost the ability to think and rely on facts and rational thinking.

My God, you have lost your mind. He could not see stopped cars. He only saw people. The video evidence is so clear.

 

[Faun]

Forget for a moment that he couldn’t even see the car he hit until he hit it... why the fuck would he want to hit a car??

So, dumbshit bigot Democrat, you think he was trying to hit people in the road on the other side of the car he couldn't see?

LOLOL

Instead of asking me questions, dumbfuck, why don’t you just answer mine? Or can’t you without sounding even more retarded than you already do?

why the fuck would he want to hit a car??

Oh, and the answer to your question is ... yes.

 

[gtopa1]

You don't need inflammatory names for him. T

I have no problem with calling a self identified white nationalist, supremist, hater a NAZI.

Except he's not a German and so not a Nazi. Fucktard? Maybe, but NOT a Nazi.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

BulletProof, post: 18993759

Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car.....

He did not aim at another car. He aimed at people. The most people. The densest mass of people within his sight. Your defense of your NAZI makes a solid case that his intent was to be a mass murderer - a terrorist. A NAZI terrorist.

You don't need inflammatory names for him. The fact that he not only didn't avoid the crowd but deliberately drove into it means he doesn't walk. Vehicular homicide at the least.

"Deliberate"...isn't that for the COURT to decide? If he's guilty then by all means; LIFE BEHIND BARS at least. But please; no lynchings; not everyone is a DemoKKKrat supporter.

Greg

 

[hadit]

BulletProof, post: 18993759

Someone who wants to hurt other people with a car is going to aim at other people, not aim at another car.....

He did not aim at another car. He aimed at people. The most people. The densest mass of people within his sight. Your defense of your NAZI makes a solid case that his intent was to be a mass murderer - a terrorist. A NAZI terrorist.

You don't need inflammatory names for him. The fact that he not only didn't avoid the crowd but deliberately drove into it means he doesn't walk. Vehicular homicide at the least.

"Deliberate"...isn't that for the COURT to decide? If he's guilty then by all means; LIFE BEHIND BARS at least. But please; no lynchings; not everyone is a DemoKKKrat supporter.

Greg

I say it's deliberate because he had plenty of room and time to stop and avoid the crowd. He did not.

 

[BulletProof]

I say it's deliberate because he had plenty of room and time to stop and avoid the crowd. He did not.

The issue is whether he intended to hurt or kill people. The fact that he rear-ended a car and made no attempt to directly hit anyone shows that he had no intent to hurt anyone. But, in the minds of shithead bigots on the Left, the fact that he's a "racist" white male who hurt someone, that proves that he intended to hurt someone.

 

[Faun]

I say it's deliberate because he had plenty of room and time to stop and avoid the crowd. He did not.

The issue is whether he intended to hurt or kill people. The fact that he rear-ended a car and made no attempt to directly hit anyone shows that he had no intent to hurt anyone. But, in the minds of shithead bigots on the Left, the fact that he's a "racist" white male who hurt someone, that proves that he intended to hurt someone.

Why are you so afraid to answer a question? Why would he want to read end a car?

 

[BulletProof]

Why are you so afraid to answer a question? Why would he want to read end a car?

Racist shitheads on the Left think that he rear-ended a car as superior choice to running directly into the crowd of fascists, to hurt the fascists. He ran into the car because he was panicked and the car was blocking his get-away path.

 

[Faun]

Why are you so afraid to answer a question? Why would he want to read end a car?

Racist shitheads on the Left think that he rear-ended a car as superior choice to running directly into the crowd of fascists, to hurt the fascists. He ran into the car because he was panicked and the car was blocking his get-away path.

You said he could see the stopped car. If his intent was to escape, why would he drive into a car? You’re not making any sense at all, dumbfuck. That’s what makes you a dumbfuck.

 

[BulletProof]

You said he could see the stopped car. If his intent was to escape, why would he drive into a car? You’re not making any sense at all, dumbfuck. That’s what makes you a dumbfuck.

My guess is he either didn't think about the car being there because of his panicked state, or he hoped the driver of the other car would decide to move if pushed.

Would you like to explain why he made no attempt to directly hit any of the many people along the road? Some shithead explained that he didn't want to hit the NOT VISIBLE barricade far down the street. Really, you're on the side shitheads, shithead.

 

[Faun]

You said he could see the stopped car. If his intent was to escape, why would he drive into a car? You’re not making any sense at all, dumbfuck. That’s what makes you a dumbfuck.

My guess is he either didn't think about the car being there because of his panicked state, or he hoped the driver of the other car would decide to move if pushed.

Would you like to explain why he made no attempt to directly hit any of the many people along the road? Some shithead explained that he didn't want to hit the NOT VISIBLE barricade far down the street. Really, you're on the side shitheads, shithead.

Dayam, you’re fucked in the head. This has already been explained. There were too many obstacles on the sides of the road and he set his sights on the bulk of the crowd, which was directly ahead of him.

 

[hadit]

I say it's deliberate because he had plenty of room and time to stop and avoid the crowd. He did not.

The issue is whether he intended to hurt or kill people. The fact that he rear-ended a car and made no attempt to directly hit anyone shows that he had no intent to hurt anyone. But, in the minds of shithead bigots on the Left, the fact that he's a "racist" white male who hurt someone, that proves that he intended to hurt someone.

The simplest way to avoid hurting anyone is:

Stop the car.
Back the car up.
Turn the car around.
Go a different way.

That's not what he did. Stop pretending the event started when he was 10 feet from the crowd. He made a decision to drive into a situation in which people got hurt. You can argue motivation until the cows come home, but he made the decisions that got those people hurt.