CDZ Chances of a USA breakup

[Billy_Kinetta]

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

 

[Pogo]

If liberals try to leave the Union, they will suffer the same fate as the last time liberals tried that.

Actually Liberals created this country. Go directly to your local library and ask them to direct you to "history".
And pack a lunch. You have a lot of work to do.

Yes, but not liberal by the modern-day definition. They have nothing in common with the Founders.

There is no "modern-day definition". Liberal means Liberal, period. You can't morph a word into its own opposite. Those that misuse the term with no idea what they're talking about need to learn from their mistake. Let us not enable them.

Liberals want to remove founding father monuments/statues. That speaks for itself.

I'll tell ya what speaks for itself ----

Why would Liberals want to remove monuments of our own people? Doesn't make any sense.

Whelp --- it's been three hours, let's see how that link search is going....

---- Nothing. Zero.

How long does finding a link take exactly?

 

[Pogo]

If liberals try to leave the Union, they will suffer the same fate as the last time liberals tried that.

Actually Liberals created this country. Go directly to your local library and ask them to direct you to "history".
And pack a lunch. You have a lot of work to do.

The founding fathers would be viewed as Nazis by the left if they were alive today.

they would also enthusiastically deport what passes for 'progressives' these days as well, especially the Pogos and Clintons.

I am not a "Progressive". I'd have to be about 140 years old.

I never said you were; you're pretty much amoral and have no principles, just a sniveling brat for the most part, so no, you have no position on th epolitical spectrum at all, true, which of course makes you even more Deportable by the Founders' standards.

.
So *I* just got a notice that "your post has been deleted - Reason: cleanup. Illegal CDZ posts or reports of violations. DON'T GET PERSONAL AT ALL in the CDZone".

Ummmmmmmmmmmm............... I'm the one who was slurred here, and I didn't even bother to respond.

Somebody needs to figure out what they're doing here. Somebody also needs to learn how to read.

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

That might be so, if only this "Progressivism" actually existed.
Or if it does, if anybody could define it.

 

[MindWars]

The U in the USA stands for United. The S stands for stand. President Obama was right, United we Stand.

NO Obama conned you dumbasses and you believed his lying bs all the way. =)

 

[MarathonMike]

There is zero chance of a breakup. No state is in a position to take itself and it's residents off of the Federal dole. Dependence on the government dollar will keep us together. Hooray for America!

 

[Picaro]

So *I* just got a notice that "your post has been deleted - Reason: cleanup. Illegal CDZ posts or reports of violations. DON'T GET PERSONAL AT ALL in the CDZone".

Ummmmmmmmmmmm............... I'm the one who was slurred here, and I didn't even bother to respond.

Somebody needs to figure out what they're doing here. Somebody also needs to learn how to read.

Posting facts aren't slurs; we have your posting history as a troll for evidence. Your history is one of a left wing racist who posts mostly anti-white rubbish as 'history', and always from a faux 'progressive' narrative, rarely anything of substance, just soapboxing and trolling. Now, do you have any responses to the original quotes you can back up, or are you just here to snivel and dissemble as usual? You've had several hours to Google Scholar up at least a semblance of a response, yet you haven't posted any, also as usual.

That might be so, if only this "Progressivism" actually existed.
Or if it does, if anybody could define it.

Ah .. never mind ... you're just here to troll, and make your usual attempts at semantic rubbish.

 

[Picaro]

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

Yes, it's not genuine 'Progressivism', just rhetorical narratives invented by old Communist propagandists masquerading as 'humanism'; it's only purpose is to fragment and destroy traditions and principles, to generate and manipulate the alienation, not build anything worthwhile, empty rhetoric aimed at the gullible.

Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.-Antonio Gramsci

 

[anotherlife]

The U in the USA stands for United. The S stands for stand. President Obama was right, United we Stand.

NO Obama conned you dumbasses and you believed his lying bs all the way. =)

I am not "incompetent", I am only "inexperienced". That is how the plate goes. There is also the version "I am not corrupt, I am only inexperienced". And it was coined by republican senators before they lost their house majority before Obama. But very good! Hehehe.

 

[anotherlife]

There is zero chance of a breakup. No state is in a position to take itself and it's residents off of the Federal dole. Dependence on the government dollar will keep us together. Hooray for America!

This is true. Also, when a police car, an ambulance, and a fire truck, all in emergency call meet together at a street junction with a postal van, who has the right of way? The postal van because it is federal.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

Non-progressives certainly think so.

 

[Meathead]

25-50%

Odds probably favor it breaking up into at least two countries as liberals aint going to like living within a third world country without public services.

Do you think a country that is 70-80% Mexican and black can be turned into a 1rst-World country by gay whites and some snowflakes?

 

[BlackSand]

.

Pineapple








"What do you think is the probability the USA will exist in its current form in 100 or so years?"
0% ... The US isn't the same today as it was yesterday ... Nor will it be the same tomorrow​

.​

 

[TheParser]

People have been predicting for a long time the eventual breakup of the United States.

I believe that the United States will manage to stay together through the 21st century.

I do believe, however, that dramatic demographic changes by the 22nd century will make a breakup highly likely.

Countries, like people, change.

If I am not mistaken, the country of Poland, has come and gone on the map at least three times.

And we all know what happened to Yugoslavia.

 

[JakeStarkey]

25-50%

Odds probably favor it breaking up into at least two countries as liberals aint going to like living within a third world country without public services.

Do you think a country that is 70-80% Mexican and black can be turned into a 1rst-World country by gay whites and some snowflakes?

Since it is not, you don't have to worry.

 

[Picaro]

Asians are the fastest growing demographic in the U.S. now, not South Americans. They will be the producers of the future, and they have little sympathy as a demographic for the usual collection of sniveling racists, having faced blatantly racist quota systems favoring 'minorities' for decades, especially in California, so you black and brown racists shouldn't start dancing in the streets and picking out those free houses and cars you're hoping to take away from 'Whitey' just yet, no matter what Obama, the Commies, and Al Sharpton keep telling you you're going to get for nothing in the near future.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lazy whites should not be dancing in the streets, either.

 

[JoeMoma]

People have been predicting for a long time the eventual breakup of the United States.

I believe that the United States will manage to stay together through the 21st century.

I do believe, however, that dramatic demographic changes by the 22nd century will make a breakup highly likely.

Countries, like people, change.

If I am not mistaken, the country of Poland, has come and gone on the map at least three times.

And we all know what happened to Yugoslavia.

The United States will not last forever. Forever is a very long time.

 

[BlackSand]

It's been a long time since the States have really been United anyway ...

The only time we really get United nowadays is when a threat appears on our horizon.
That is even becoming more and more divisive ... We probably don't have to worry about separating as much as dissolving.

.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?

What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?

Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?

Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?

Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Breakup? No.

Steady decay into mediocrity? Sure. That's already begun.

Only one faction has decayed, and that is the regressive / reactionary right wing, which has gotten power. American history suggests the future will be progressive.

That seems most unlikely considering that modern Progressivism is in most ways diametrically opposed to the US Constitution,

In what respect is modern Progressivism (odd use of the word for) Progressiveness (BTW, and it is not an ism)?

What and how do progressive people violate the principles of our founders, which by most measures were radical?

Which articles/clauses of COTUS do they seek to overturn/violate?

Which articles/clauses do they interpret wrongly or to their advantage?

Do progressives seek to suppress the vote, suppress the rights of minorities, gay and lesbian citizens and repeal two plus centuries of jurisprudence?

Your initial sentence is a mess.

That said, it is an "ism" in every sense of the word; a totalitarian basis of worship for all those claiming to be American who seek to raise the State above the Individual.

It's all been tried before. You won't win this time either.

As for the rest, I've no time to write you a book. The history is in plain sight, if you merely look beyond what you have been told.