The ClayTaurus
Senior Member
- Sep 19, 2005
- 7,062
- 333
- 48
I'm saying they can't be trusted. There's no details behind any of the statistics. You'd need full access to exactly how they came up with those percentages, eg what the question they asked was, who they asked, who they ommitted, etc. etc. You'd need to look at their process of determining the statistic from the ground up to truely evaluate their validity. Otherwise, as my initial post said, it's tough to trust statistics from EITHER side, because both are heavily biased.Pale Rider said:OK... so what are you saying about the above statistics? That they're incorrect, or lies?