Capitalistic greed is the main problem in the U.S.

Its nice that you have such faith in companies and consumers but your scenario is just not reality. Look at history and look at other countries that have no regulations. You use electronics as an example? How about you review something that is an actual risk or threat to life and health... Medicine, Food, Transportation, Energy etc.

We aren't talking about protecting people from a malfunctioning iPhone, we are talking about human lives.

Look at examples, like:

Contaminated Medicine that has resulted in many deaths around the world:
List of medicine contamination incidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That can't be! You have your beloved government to protect you.

Polluted food and water sources causing Typhoid fever and other illnesses resulting in death and illness:
The 10 Deadliest Outbreaks in U.S. History -- Revisited | Food Safety News

The effect that the seatbelt law has had on save human life in auto accidents:
Policy Impact: Seat Belts | Motor Vehicle Safety | CDC Injury Center

The nuclear weapons plant in Colorado that illegally dumped and polluted the surrounding land with radio active waste:
Rocky Flats Plant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But GOVERNMENT is that answer to all questions, how is it possible that adulterated food and drugs exist with our crack FDA on the case?

Oh and moron, U/L deals with electric stoves, pool pumps, electric heaters, etc. Stuff that will kill you dead in an instant if it malfunctions.

Unlike your beloved government - U/L has a sterling record. As does the IEEE who designed the grid that carries 480 volt power to you apartment and the government agency you're employed with.
Another cop out answer... I've said multiple times that the government owns a big part of the problem. But you keep painting me with that ignorant partisan brush... I'm about done with you

Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
 
Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...

According to whom, Karl Marx?

We have long established that you have not a hint of a clue as to how economies operate. You are a greedy, ignorant socialist convinced that your envy is equivalent to achievement.

the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.

Capitalism ruins economies?

:lmao:

Did you sleep through 2008 and its impact during the dark days of winter 2009?
 
Hillary is taking fucking bribes from them, Moron.

You can't be this stupid, it isn't possible...
I'm the moron? Ok genius please explain how Mylan's donation to the Clinton foundation resulted in anything that Clinton did or didn't do to work in their favor. Describe what you propose Clinton do about this situation other than what she has already done (voice her objection). Be specific... I'll save you some time... You can't because you are full of shit.

Give back the money. If Clinton doesn't like what the company did, prove it by returning the donation in full.
Is that what charities do? Vet the donors and return the money if they have differences with the donor? Who else does this? I've never heard of it before

Sounds to me as you are the same type hypocrite as Hillary. I'll take your money then chastise what you do but send me more.
Want to try answering the question?

I provided an example and so did someone else.
 
When such a low percentage of people vote, it definitely refutes your claim that "our officials are elected by the people".
You're right, the monkeys elect them... you win

It damn sure isn't a representative portion of THE PEOPLE.
Oh, now you add the word "representative" I see... Nice try

When you said "The People", did you mean anything other than ALL the people?

I didn't add representative. When only a small portion of the whole shows up, it isn't The People, it's a representative portion OF the people.
Dude, it's simple, there is an election, individuals campaign, the people vote, the one with the most votes is elected. We are not going to force people who don't want to vote to vote. You should be thankful that 100% don't vote or a republican would never win another election

It's simple. Unless 100% of the people vote, those elected are a representative portion of THE PEOPLE.
 
That is a lame argument.

Pretty complacent too.
What are you talking about? This is our reality. It is our country and the system that governs it. It is an evolving process and with each election we have the opportunity to institute change, so we voice the changes that we want made.

What's your plan? Anarchy?

Follow the Constitution not what people want added to it for which the government has no authority to do.
Then fight to tweak the machine in that favor... Thats my point

So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
 
Its nice that you have such faith in companies and consumers but your scenario is just not reality. Look at history and look at other countries that have no regulations. You use electronics as an example? How about you review something that is an actual risk or threat to life and health... Medicine, Food, Transportation, Energy etc.

We aren't talking about protecting people from a malfunctioning iPhone, we are talking about human lives.

Look at examples, like:

Contaminated Medicine that has resulted in many deaths around the world:
List of medicine contamination incidents - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That can't be! You have your beloved government to protect you.

Polluted food and water sources causing Typhoid fever and other illnesses resulting in death and illness:
The 10 Deadliest Outbreaks in U.S. History -- Revisited | Food Safety News

The effect that the seatbelt law has had on save human life in auto accidents:
Policy Impact: Seat Belts | Motor Vehicle Safety | CDC Injury Center

The nuclear weapons plant in Colorado that illegally dumped and polluted the surrounding land with radio active waste:
Rocky Flats Plant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But GOVERNMENT is that answer to all questions, how is it possible that adulterated food and drugs exist with our crack FDA on the case?

Oh and moron, U/L deals with electric stoves, pool pumps, electric heaters, etc. Stuff that will kill you dead in an instant if it malfunctions.

Unlike your beloved government - U/L has a sterling record. As does the IEEE who designed the grid that carries 480 volt power to you apartment and the government agency you're employed with.
Another cop out answer... I've said multiple times that the government owns a big part of the problem. But you keep painting me with that ignorant partisan brush... I'm about done with you

Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
It's never going to be all or nothing. We have a system that should provide law, order, accountability and oversight so that our public is protected. The degree in which the government is involved should be dictated by the actions of its people and businesses. The more corrupt we are the more involve the gov will become... Lessening regulation is a much better case to make after a track history of responsible commerce. We haven't done a great job in recent years.... Look at 2008.
Government was also part of that problem so both sides are in need of overhaul and increased accountability
 
Did you sleep through 2008 and its impact during the dark days of winter 2009?

You are a demagogue and a socialist who has virtually no ethical code. Service to your party in the war to destroy the Constitutional republic is literally the only value you have ever exhibited.

Did I sleep through 2008? No, but I'm not an ignorant Bolshevik so I grasp what a CDO and an MBS is. I understand the CRA and the incentives placed as well as the precedent setting actions of Janet Reno in filing civil actions based on Title VII against institutions who failed to abide strictly to CRA.

Look, you're a leftist spewing moronic bullshit from the Soros hate site, but you're in my wheel house. You can scream all the obscenities that you leftists desire and it won't change the facts at all.

You spew ignorance and hatred - it is your way, but it fails to impress.
 
Hillary is taking fucking bribes from them, Moron.

You can't be this stupid, it isn't possible...
I'm the moron? Ok genius please explain how Mylan's donation to the Clinton foundation resulted in anything that Clinton did or didn't do to work in their favor. Describe what you propose Clinton do about this situation other than what she has already done (voice her objection). Be specific... I'll save you some time... You can't because you are full of shit.

Give back the money. If Clinton doesn't like what the company did, prove it by returning the donation in full.
Is that what charities do? Vet the donors and return the money if they have differences with the donor? Who else does this? I've never heard of it before

Giuliani rejects $10 million from Saudi prince
October 12, 2001 Posted: 3:14 AM EDT (0714 GMT)
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Mayor Rudy Giuliani said Thursday the city would not accept a $10 million donation for disaster relief from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal after the prince suggested U.S. policies in the Middle East contributed to the September 11 attacks.
Good for him!

You asked "is that what charities do" to my suggestion and were provided with examples of them doing it despite saying you've never heard of it. What that means is Hillary has two options so as not to provide another example of being a hypocrite. She can give it back since she doesn't like what Mylan is doing or STFU. If she chooses to give it back, say all she wants. If she chooses to keep it, STFU.
 
What are you talking about? This is our reality. It is our country and the system that governs it. It is an evolving process and with each election we have the opportunity to institute change, so we voice the changes that we want made.

What's your plan? Anarchy?

Follow the Constitution not what people want added to it for which the government has no authority to do.
Then fight to tweak the machine in that favor... Thats my point

So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
You're gonna have to be more specific than that if you want to make a point
 
Crony socialism is the problem....the politicians use their power to help their donors......that isn't capitalism...that is the government, controlling taxes, fines and fees and licensing, and using it's power to help one group over another...that is not the role of government...but that is what happens under socialism...
 
That can't be! You have your beloved government to protect you.

But GOVERNMENT is that answer to all questions, how is it possible that adulterated food and drugs exist with our crack FDA on the case?

Oh and moron, U/L deals with electric stoves, pool pumps, electric heaters, etc. Stuff that will kill you dead in an instant if it malfunctions.

Unlike your beloved government - U/L has a sterling record. As does the IEEE who designed the grid that carries 480 volt power to you apartment and the government agency you're employed with.
Another cop out answer... I've said multiple times that the government owns a big part of the problem. But you keep painting me with that ignorant partisan brush... I'm about done with you

Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

Again, you put in terms that are too subjective and allow people to make those decisions based on politics rather than the meaning of the word.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
It's never going to be all or nothing. We have a system that should provide law, order, accountability and oversight so that our public is protected. The degree in which the government is involved should be dictated by the actions of its people and businesses. The more corrupt we are the more involve the gov will become... Lessening regulation is a much better case to make after a track history of responsible commerce. We haven't done a great job in recent years.... Look at 2008.
Government was also part of that problem so both sides are in need of overhaul and increased accountability
Follow the Constitution not what people want added to it for which the government has no authority to do.
Then fight to tweak the machine in that favor... Thats my point

So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
You're gonna have to be more specific than that if you want to make a point

The specific examples aren't important. That you believe the government can do THINGS outside it's Constitutional authority is the relevant part. It can be ANYTHING you support for which the government has no power to do.
 
I'm the moron? Ok genius please explain how Mylan's donation to the Clinton foundation resulted in anything that Clinton did or didn't do to work in their favor. Describe what you propose Clinton do about this situation other than what she has already done (voice her objection). Be specific... I'll save you some time... You can't because you are full of shit.

Give back the money. If Clinton doesn't like what the company did, prove it by returning the donation in full.
Is that what charities do? Vet the donors and return the money if they have differences with the donor? Who else does this? I've never heard of it before

Giuliani rejects $10 million from Saudi prince
October 12, 2001 Posted: 3:14 AM EDT (0714 GMT)
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Mayor Rudy Giuliani said Thursday the city would not accept a $10 million donation for disaster relief from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal after the prince suggested U.S. policies in the Middle East contributed to the September 11 attacks.
Good for him!

You asked "is that what charities do" to my suggestion and were provided with examples of them doing it despite saying you've never heard of it. What that means is Hillary has two options so as not to provide another example of being a hypocrite. She can give it back since she doesn't like what Mylan is doing or STFU. If she chooses to give it back, say all she wants. If she chooses to keep it, STFU.
That's one way to go about it... Not what I would do, if I got money donated to my charity I'd use that money for the good that my charity is doing... I'm not running for president either so there is a higher standard and public perception that needs to be considered. So who they accept funds from is a valid argument. There is also the question on whether only Hilllary has the individual power in the organization to decide who they take funds from and if they give funds back because of her campaign. The Foundation may be bigger than just one persons personal interests.

What about you? Do you pick and chose which customers you take money from? If you had a charity would you return money to a business that did something you disagree with?
 
Another cop out answer... I've said multiple times that the government owns a big part of the problem. But you keep painting me with that ignorant partisan brush... I'm about done with you

Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

Again, you put in terms that are too subjective and allow people to make those decisions based on politics rather than the meaning of the word.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
It's never going to be all or nothing. We have a system that should provide law, order, accountability and oversight so that our public is protected. The degree in which the government is involved should be dictated by the actions of its people and businesses. The more corrupt we are the more involve the gov will become... Lessening regulation is a much better case to make after a track history of responsible commerce. We haven't done a great job in recent years.... Look at 2008.
Government was also part of that problem so both sides are in need of overhaul and increased accountability
Then fight to tweak the machine in that favor... Thats my point

So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
You're gonna have to be more specific than that if you want to make a point

The specific examples aren't important. That you believe the government can do THINGS outside it's Constitutional authority is the relevant part. It can be ANYTHING you support for which the government has no power to do.
I don't believe I've stated anything that I think the government can do that is outside the constitution. You claim that I do so give me an example.
 
Now that the FDA requires pharmaceutical companies to fund their own testing process that takes years, they are out billions of dollars by the time the product hits the shelves. How do they make that up except to charge high prices? These companies are not charities and charities don't make life saving drugs.

Spoken like a true fascist, corporations are people too, but do they pay taxes as do you and I, not hardly.
I don't pay taxes either. I'm a truck driver who deducts per diam and I got 4 little tax credits at home. (3 boys, 1 girl ages 2-13) Sorry to undermine your argument.

Are you an O/O of a 18 wheeler semi tractor? My son drives for UPS, he is in the Teamsters Union and has great benefits and is home every night. He has a double major, Math and compurter tech, but both jobs he had before had no benefits, he was an independent contractor. He left, went to work for UPS and enjoys the work, no longer needs to pay for a gym membership and has no need to worry about job security.
Jesus Christ is so good. His kindness and mercy towards you should be leading you to repentance rather than launching a personal signature campaign against His people, Wry. Don't you think?
11 million Native Americans were slaughtered in the name of Jesus.

That is a lie. But let us get to the truth you avoid, hangover. How many have been slaughtered in the name of Lucifer and his religion of communism? How many have been killed in wars, starved to death, imprisoned and murdered in the name of communism? 200 million or so? And how many have perished for the reason of true capitalism?

Furthermore who owns the pharmaceutical cartels such as Solvay who sold out to Abbott labs and whose family name (Solvay) has been repeatedly linked to Lucifereans, Satanism, and human sacrifice at the highest echelons of Belgium for decades now? Are they all not Democrats? Cutting to the chase here..... How many human sacrifices have there been to Lucifer since the time of Nimrod and Semiramis (the witch)? Perhaps billions, yes? Yet you never seem to get to the root of the problem, hangover. Why is that?

The truth is the very thing you claim to despise is caused by people such as yourself. You are part of the problem, hangover.

Your hypocrisy is startling. I pray it is in ignorance.
 
Capitalism is what prospers a society therein giving it freedom to flourish.

Communism is what destroys a society by crushing capitalism, freedom of Christians, freedom to flourish because without complete iron fisted control of a society - Communism cannot survive.

Which is why Communism and Capitalism cannot co-exist.
The Communists have to turn America into a 3rd world nation in order to bring her to her knees and control her every move. That is the direction Communists want to take America.

That is the motive behind those who speak against Capitalism. They seek to destroy it so that they can destroy your way of life (freedom).
 
Capitalism is what prospers a society therein giving it freedom to flourish.

Communism is what destroys a society by crushing capitalism, freedom of Christians, freedom to flourish because without complete iron fisted control of a society - Communism cannot survive.

Which is why Communism and Capitalism cannot co-exist.
The Communists have to turn America into a 3rd world nation in order to bring her to her knees and control her every move. That is the direction Communists want to take America.

That is the motive behind those who speak against Capitalism. They seek to destroy it so that they can destroy your way of life (freedom).

You have no understanding of the words you use.

Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 21:12-13 - New International Version - UK

Matthew 21:12 Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves.

Why Did Jesus Drive the Money Changers From the Temple?

Q. What can we infer from Jesus?

A. Jesus was the first regulator of Capitalism.
 
Another cop out answer... I've said multiple times that the government owns a big part of the problem. But you keep painting me with that ignorant partisan brush... I'm about done with you

Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

Again, you put in terms that are too subjective and allow people to make those decisions based on politics rather than the meaning of the word.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
It's never going to be all or nothing. We have a system that should provide law, order, accountability and oversight so that our public is protected. The degree in which the government is involved should be dictated by the actions of its people and businesses. The more corrupt we are the more involve the gov will become... Lessening regulation is a much better case to make after a track history of responsible commerce. We haven't done a great job in recent years.... Look at 2008.
Government was also part of that problem so both sides are in need of overhaul and increased accountability
Then fight to tweak the machine in that favor... Thats my point

So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
You're gonna have to be more specific than that if you want to make a point

The specific examples aren't important. That you believe the government can do THINGS outside it's Constitutional authority is the relevant part. It can be ANYTHING you support for which the government has no power to do.

First, we have the Supreme Court to determine what is and is not within the Constitutional powers of the Government. Second, the Constitution can be amended.
 
The price of the Epipen just went up 500%. It costs a dollar to make, and big pharma is charging $500.00 to save a child's life.

The cost of all drugs in the U.S. are ten times more than any other country.

Health insurance is high because of greed. Doctors and hospitals are some of the greediest.

And it's not just big pharma, it's big oil too. When oil was $140.00 a barrel, gas cost $4.00 a gallon. Now oil is three times less at $47.00 a barrel, and we still pay over $2,20 a gallon.

But the real big greed is the military industrial contractors. $600.00 for toilet seats.....$500.00 for coffee makers....and that's just the cheap stuff.

Greed is why we have a $17 trillion national debt.

Greed is why most crimes are committed. Most in prison are there because of greed.

Lawyers are greedy. NO money, you're guilty.

Politicians work less than six months a year for over $200,000.00 plus healthcare, paid vacations, free transportation, and full retirement after four years.

Remember all you 20, 30 & 40 somethings, you're gonna be old in the blink of an eye....and you're gonna pay through the wazoo. Promise.

The issue is morality. The country has been stripped of its Judeo-Christian heritage and replaced with Marxism that only focuses on materialism. Your post is proof of that.

A society that is free must be moral, otherwise, they will use their freedom for amoral behavior and the said freedoms will be stripped away.

That is why the population in the US once enjoyed a free market and helped those in need when they were needed by their own free will, but now they must be made to pay more for the government to do it for them. It is also why Americans once enjoyed the right to bear arms, but ever since the 1960's gun violence had skyrocketed to the point that Hillary is on the verge of confiscating all your weapons.

The key to destroying freedom and creating a police state is the destruction of the moral fiber of society. People will literally be begging for a police state someday.
 
Since gov is supposed to control capitalism so the free market greed style of capitalism doesnt take over the world...the gov is 100% of the problem. Capitalism is just doing what unchecked unregulated free market capitalism does...ruins economies, lives and countries.
You can't pass 100% of the responsibility to the government. We all have individual responsibilities and as citizens and business owners to follow the law and promote a healthy society. The better we do the less the government will need to intervene.

Again, you put in terms that are too subjective and allow people to make those decisions based on politics rather than the meaning of the word.

In a world where everyone was pure goodness, we could have less government. Unfortunately, most people are rotten which is why we need government regulation.

It only takes one Al Capone to force all business people into using gangster tactics.

Hey, maybe another couple of thousand of years on evolution, we won't need government.
It's never going to be all or nothing. We have a system that should provide law, order, accountability and oversight so that our public is protected. The degree in which the government is involved should be dictated by the actions of its people and businesses. The more corrupt we are the more involve the gov will become... Lessening regulation is a much better case to make after a track history of responsible commerce. We haven't done a great job in recent years.... Look at 2008.
Government was also part of that problem so both sides are in need of overhaul and increased accountability
So you do support the government doing things for which the Constitution gives them no power? Typical piece of shit Liberal. No wonder the Constitution is being destroyed. People like you hate it.
You are hopeless. The constitution is a wonderful thing and lays the foundation for how we govern...

I'm not the one that thinks the government should do things for which the Constitution grants is absolutely no power. You are then try to justify them doing so. Your words here and your words before don't match.
You're gonna have to be more specific than that if you want to make a point

The specific examples aren't important. That you believe the government can do THINGS outside it's Constitutional authority is the relevant part. It can be ANYTHING you support for which the government has no power to do.

First, we have the Supreme Court to determine what is and is not within the Constitutional powers of the Government. Second, the Constitution can be amended.

FIRST the Supreme Court does not have the power to determine what is and what is not Constitutional. So let's not pretend Marbury v. Madison is part of COTUS, it was a court decision no different than Heller, Roe, or Bush v . Gore.
 
The price of the Epipen just went up 500%. It costs a dollar to make, and big pharma is charging $500.00 to save a child's life.

The cost of all drugs in the U.S. are ten times more than any other country.

Health insurance is high because of greed. Doctors and hospitals are some of the greediest.

And it's not just big pharma, it's big oil too. When oil was $140.00 a barrel, gas cost $4.00 a gallon. Now oil is three times less at $47.00 a barrel, and we still pay over $2,20 a gallon.

But the real big greed is the military industrial contractors. $600.00 for toilet seats.....$500.00 for coffee makers....and that's just the cheap stuff.

Greed is why we have a $17 trillion national debt.

Greed is why most crimes are committed. Most in prison are there because of greed.

Lawyers are greedy. NO money, you're guilty.

Politicians work less than six months a year for over $200,000.00 plus healthcare, paid vacations, free transportation, and full retirement after four years.

Remember all you 20, 30 & 40 somethings, you're gonna be old in the blink of an eye....and you're gonna pay through the wazoo. Promise.

The issue is morality. The country has been stripped of its Judeo-Christian heritage and replaced with Marxism that only focuses on materialism. Your post is proof of that.

A society that is free must be moral, otherwise, they will use their freedom for amoral behavior and the said freedoms will be stripped away.

That is why the population in the US once enjoyed a free market and helped those in need when they were needed by their own free will, but now they must be made to pay more for the government to do it for them. It is also why Americans once enjoyed the right to bear arms, but ever since the 1960's gun violence had skyrocketed to the point that Hillary is on the verge of confiscating all your weapons.

The key to destroying freedom and creating a police state is the destruction of the moral fiber of society. People will literally be begging for a police state someday.


You have a rather starry eyed and childish view of America's history:

First, there was NEVER a time when Americans helped those in need. A very large percentage of Americans lived in absolute poverty before 1960.

Second, gun control dates back to the 1800s in America. In fact, the legal reason for the gun fight at the O.K. corral was gun control. It was against the law for people to carry guns in Tombstone. The gun fight started when Wyatt Earp tried to disarm the Clanton gang.

Please try to grow up!
 

Forum List

Back
Top