Canadian Attack on Christian Values and Parental Rights

[Spare_change]

In a vivid demonstration of how Canada, from the Liberal government down to the local public school, is conducting a war on Judeo-Christian morality, a Christian father who has been battling for the simple right to get advance notice before his children are indoctrinated with LGBTTIQ values watched his case hit Ontario’s appeal court this week.

Steve Tourloukis, a father of two children, initially requested religious accommodation from the school board for his children in 2010, after the 2009 Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy was implemented by then-minister of education Kathleen Wynne, a lesbian, and her deputy minister, Ben Levin. Levin was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges.

In 2010, Tourloukis simply asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, who were four and six, would be taught about homosexuality, abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism. Once notified, he could choose to keep them at home, so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.

In 2012, Tourloukis began a legal challenge, objecting to teachers making “value judgments” in class, e.g. homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,” and public school boards’ statutory obligations.

Reid said Tourloukis could send his children to private schools. Polizogopoulos asked the Appeal Court to reverse Reid’s decision.

On Monday, as LifeSite News reported:

The board’s lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to “indoctrinate” students, but that Ontario’s public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13. Accommodating Tourloukis would “directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.”

Attorney Josh Hunter, representing the Liberal government, said if the Tourloukis children didn’t attend class it to leave class would “undermine the board’s message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity” and would be “harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.”

Worse, ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers were mandated by law to positively represent homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism: to teach children not just to “tolerate” LGBTQ lifestyle, but to “honour and respect” and “celebrate” it.

Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalition’s senior political strategist, called Hughes’ assertion “a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.” He told LifeSiteNews that she argued that “teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers aren’t embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then they’re not meeting the ‘statutory objectives.'”

 

[TNHarley]

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,”

Thats some bullshit. Just another sign telling people leftists dont give a fuck about liberty and rule with emotion.
Fucking tyrants.

 

[BULLDOG]

In a vivid demonstration of how Canada, from the Liberal government down to the local public school, is conducting a war on Judeo-Christian morality, a Christian father who has been battling for the simple right to get advance notice before his children are indoctrinated with LGBTTIQ values watched his case hit Ontario’s appeal court this week.

Steve Tourloukis, a father of two children, initially requested religious accommodation from the school board for his children in 2010, after the 2009 Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy was implemented by then-minister of education Kathleen Wynne, a lesbian, and her deputy minister, Ben Levin. Levin was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges.

In 2010, Tourloukis simply asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, who were four and six, would be taught about homosexuality, abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism. Once notified, he could choose to keep them at home, so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.

In 2012, Tourloukis began a legal challenge, objecting to teachers making “value judgments” in class, e.g. homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,” and public school boards’ statutory obligations.

Reid said Tourloukis could send his children to private schools. Polizogopoulos asked the Appeal Court to reverse Reid’s decision.

On Monday, as LifeSite News reported:

The board’s lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to “indoctrinate” students, but that Ontario’s public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13. Accommodating Tourloukis would “directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.”

Attorney Josh Hunter, representing the Liberal government, said if the Tourloukis children didn’t attend class it to leave class would “undermine the board’s message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity” and would be “harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.”

Worse, ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers were mandated by law to positively represent homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism: to teach children not just to “tolerate” LGBTQ lifestyle, but to “honour and respect” and “celebrate” it.

Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalition’s senior political strategist, called Hughes’ assertion “a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.” He told LifeSiteNews that she argued that “teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers aren’t embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then they’re not meeting the ‘statutory objectives.'”

So a religious nut got a religious nut layer to make some stupid statements. What a surprise.

 

[Spare_change]

In a vivid demonstration of how Canada, from the Liberal government down to the local public school, is conducting a war on Judeo-Christian morality, a Christian father who has been battling for the simple right to get advance notice before his children are indoctrinated with LGBTTIQ values watched his case hit Ontario’s appeal court this week.

Steve Tourloukis, a father of two children, initially requested religious accommodation from the school board for his children in 2010, after the 2009 Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy was implemented by then-minister of education Kathleen Wynne, a lesbian, and her deputy minister, Ben Levin. Levin was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges.

In 2010, Tourloukis simply asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, who were four and six, would be taught about homosexuality, abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism. Once notified, he could choose to keep them at home, so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.

In 2012, Tourloukis began a legal challenge, objecting to teachers making “value judgments” in class, e.g. homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,” and public school boards’ statutory obligations.

Reid said Tourloukis could send his children to private schools. Polizogopoulos asked the Appeal Court to reverse Reid’s decision.

On Monday, as LifeSite News reported:

The board’s lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to “indoctrinate” students, but that Ontario’s public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13. Accommodating Tourloukis would “directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.”

Attorney Josh Hunter, representing the Liberal government, said if the Tourloukis children didn’t attend class it to leave class would “undermine the board’s message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity” and would be “harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.”

Worse, ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers were mandated by law to positively represent homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism: to teach children not just to “tolerate” LGBTQ lifestyle, but to “honour and respect” and “celebrate” it.

Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalition’s senior political strategist, called Hughes’ assertion “a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.” He told LifeSiteNews that she argued that “teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers aren’t embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then they’re not meeting the ‘statutory objectives.'”

So a religious nut got a religious nut layer to make some stupid statements. What a surprise.

Work on your spelling and we MIGHT take you seriously .... but, probably not.

 

[BULLDOG]

In a vivid demonstration of how Canada, from the Liberal government down to the local public school, is conducting a war on Judeo-Christian morality, a Christian father who has been battling for the simple right to get advance notice before his children are indoctrinated with LGBTTIQ values watched his case hit Ontario’s appeal court this week.

Steve Tourloukis, a father of two children, initially requested religious accommodation from the school board for his children in 2010, after the 2009 Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy was implemented by then-minister of education Kathleen Wynne, a lesbian, and her deputy minister, Ben Levin. Levin was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges.

In 2010, Tourloukis simply asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, who were four and six, would be taught about homosexuality, abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism. Once notified, he could choose to keep them at home, so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.

In 2012, Tourloukis began a legal challenge, objecting to teachers making “value judgments” in class, e.g. homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,” and public school boards’ statutory obligations.

Reid said Tourloukis could send his children to private schools. Polizogopoulos asked the Appeal Court to reverse Reid’s decision.

On Monday, as LifeSite News reported:

The board’s lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to “indoctrinate” students, but that Ontario’s public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13. Accommodating Tourloukis would “directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.”

Attorney Josh Hunter, representing the Liberal government, said if the Tourloukis children didn’t attend class it to leave class would “undermine the board’s message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity” and would be “harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.”

Worse, ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers were mandated by law to positively represent homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism: to teach children not just to “tolerate” LGBTQ lifestyle, but to “honour and respect” and “celebrate” it.

Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalition’s senior political strategist, called Hughes’ assertion “a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.” He told LifeSiteNews that she argued that “teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers aren’t embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then they’re not meeting the ‘statutory objectives.'”

So a religious nut got a religious nut layer to make some stupid statements. What a surprise.

Work on your spelling and we MIGHT take you seriously .... but, probably not.

Of course you won't. You're a RWNJ.

 

[Spare_change]

In a vivid demonstration of how Canada, from the Liberal government down to the local public school, is conducting a war on Judeo-Christian morality, a Christian father who has been battling for the simple right to get advance notice before his children are indoctrinated with LGBTTIQ values watched his case hit Ontario’s appeal court this week.

Steve Tourloukis, a father of two children, initially requested religious accommodation from the school board for his children in 2010, after the 2009 Equity and Inclusivity Education Strategy was implemented by then-minister of education Kathleen Wynne, a lesbian, and her deputy minister, Ben Levin. Levin was convicted in March 2015 of three child pornography related charges.

In 2010, Tourloukis simply asked to be alerted beforehand when and how his children, who were four and six, would be taught about homosexuality, abortion, the occult, and cultural relativism. Once notified, he could choose to keep them at home, so he could decide whether to withdraw them from class.

In 2012, Tourloukis began a legal challenge, objecting to teachers making “value judgments” in class, e.g. homosexuality as natural, or abortion as morally acceptable.

Justice Robert Reid ruled Tourloukis’ Charter rights had been violated, but that was “reasonable” because of the competing Charter “values” of “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism,” and public school boards’ statutory obligations.

Reid said Tourloukis could send his children to private schools. Polizogopoulos asked the Appeal Court to reverse Reid’s decision.

On Monday, as LifeSite News reported:

The board’s lawyer argued a public school is not allowed to “indoctrinate” students, but that Ontario’s public schools have statutory obligation to create safe schools, including the EIES, Policy Memorandum 119, and the 2012 Accepting Schools Act, or Bill 13. Accommodating Tourloukis would “directly impact the ability of Ontario public schools to provide students with a positive, inclusive, and supportive educational environment.”

Attorney Josh Hunter, representing the Liberal government, said if the Tourloukis children didn’t attend class it to leave class would “undermine the board’s message that it is important to accept, welcome, and celebrate diversity” and would be “harmful to the rights of other students to feel accepted and welcomed.”

Worse, ETFO lawyer Kate Hughes argued teachers were mandated by law to positively represent homosexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism: to teach children not just to “tolerate” LGBTQ lifestyle, but to “honour and respect” and “celebrate” it.

Jack Fonseca, Campaign Life Coalition’s senior political strategist, called Hughes’ assertion “a brazen, unashamed admission that indoctrination was the goal.” He told LifeSiteNews that she argued that “teachers have a statutory obligation to celebrate LGBT identities and same-sex relationships, and that if teachers aren’t embedding that celebration into every subject every day, then they’re not meeting the ‘statutory objectives.'”

So a religious nut got a religious nut layer to make some stupid statements. What a surprise.

Work on your spelling and we MIGHT take you seriously .... but, probably not.

Of course you won't. You're a RWNJ.

Is that the best you can do? Resort to immature name calling? Aren't you capable of mounting an intelligent response? Are you so lacking in in-depth understanding of the issue that you must immediately resort to sophomoric attacks?

Sad ... but not surprising. In fact, pretty much par for the course.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Good for Canada....As long as Christians still have the right to worship and practice their religion I don't have a problem with this.

What gives christianity the idea that it can control people that don't wish to be controlled by it? What I think you're saying is if christianity doesn't get its way over all then the entire nation is evil for doing so. That sounds like radical islam and that isn't right.

People have a right to be gay, trans or non-religious...Be very careful on what you promote as you might get something that appears to be like the people we're at war with.

 

[Spare_change]

Good for Canada....As long as Christians still have the right to worship and practice their religion I don't have a problem with this.

What gives christianity the idea that it can control people that don't wish to be controlled by it? What I think you're saying is if christianity doesn't get its way over all then the entire nation is evil for doing so. That sounds like radical islam and that isn't right.

People have a right to be gay, trans or non-religious...Be very careful on what you promote as you might get something that appears to be like the people we're at war with.

You, of course, intentionally misinterpreted the story.

It isn't about being gay, or non-religious. It is about the right of a parent to determine the quality and content of the education of his children.

Nothing more - nothing less.