Can the Media be Biased Against Trump?

[gipper]

Let's face it

The press needs to say...

Mr Trump....that is not true
Mr Trump that did not happen
Mr Trump, that is an outright lie

Instead they let him get away with it

When will the press and you demand the same of Clinton?

 

[rightwinger]

Let's face it

The press needs to say...

Mr Trump....that is not true
Mr Trump that did not happen
Mr Trump, that is an outright lie

Instead they let him get away with it

When will the press and you demand the same of Clinton?

Go for it

Can we talk some Benghazi?

 

[rhodescholar]

Let's face it

The press needs to say...

Mr Trump....that is not true
Mr Trump that did not happen
Mr Trump, that is an outright lie

Instead they let him get away with it

When will the press and you demand the same of Clinton?

Go for it

Can we talk some Benghazi?

When you have something intelligent to offer besides trolling, please let the forum know.

 

[rightwinger]

Fact is Hillary is not making the bizarre, unsupported, outright lies that Trump makes on a daily basis


The press challenging Trump more than they challenge Hillary is not bias

 

[hadit]

The difference is that Hillary has run a conventional campaign and has stuck to the issues. That is what the press has been reporting They have also reported on Trumps bizarre claims, half truths and lied That is not unbalanced reporting

"Stuck to the issues?" As in how come her illegal use of a private mail server for classified information is not front and center? How is it that the masthead and lead articles for the past 3 months in the NYT have ALL been anti-Trump bile? Check it out today, its no different than it has been for months. No sane adult can claim that the media is not strenuously working to discredit Trump.

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

 

[rightwinger]

The difference is that Hillary has run a conventional campaign and has stuck to the issues. That is what the press has been reporting They have also reported on Trumps bizarre claims, half truths and lied That is not unbalanced reporting

"Stuck to the issues?" As in how come her illegal use of a private mail server for classified information is not front and center? How is it that the masthead and lead articles for the past 3 months in the NYT have ALL been anti-Trump bile? Check it out today, its no different than it has been for months. No sane adult can claim that the media is not strenuously working to discredit Trump.

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

 

[hadit]

The difference is that Hillary has run a conventional campaign and has stuck to the issues. That is what the press has been reporting They have also reported on Trumps bizarre claims, half truths and lied That is not unbalanced reporting

"Stuck to the issues?" As in how come her illegal use of a private mail server for classified information is not front and center? How is it that the masthead and lead articles for the past 3 months in the NYT have ALL been anti-Trump bile? Check it out today, its no different than it has been for months. No sane adult can claim that the media is not strenuously working to discredit Trump.

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

 

[rightwinger]

The difference is that Hillary has run a conventional campaign and has stuck to the issues. That is what the press has been reporting They have also reported on Trumps bizarre claims, half truths and lied That is not unbalanced reporting

"Stuck to the issues?" As in how come her illegal use of a private mail server for classified information is not front and center? How is it that the masthead and lead articles for the past 3 months in the NYT have ALL been anti-Trump bile? Check it out today, its no different than it has been for months. No sane adult can claim that the media is not strenuously working to discredit Trump.

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

 

[hadit]

"Stuck to the issues?" As in how come her illegal use of a private mail server for classified information is not front and center? How is it that the masthead and lead articles for the past 3 months in the NYT have ALL been anti-Trump bile? Check it out today, its no different than it has been for months. No sane adult can claim that the media is not strenuously working to discredit Trump.

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

 

[rightwinger]

Hillary's private use of an email server has been reported for four years. It was investigated and no violations worthy of prosecuting were found. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

 

[hadit]

Nothing they are hyperventilating about Trump is worthy of prosecuting either. Sometimes you just gotta stop beating a dead horse.

You want Trump to talk about policy and issues? Ask him detailed questions about them. I see no one asking either of the candidates those types of questions, do you?

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump keeps giving them a fresh horse to beat

Both Benghazi and the emails are four years old dead horses

I saw Trump on the O'Reilly Factor last night. O'Reilly did just that. Asked Trump EXACTLY how he would stop inner city crime over night. He asked Trump EXACTLY what he planned to do with 11 million immigrants

Trump, as expected, refused to provide specifics

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

 

[hadit]

And that's what the media is supposed to do, keep after candidates and don't allow them to answer with nonsense. Interesting that O'Reilly did that (guess he cares about something more substantial than Trump's hairdo). They need to stop asking Hillary what it's like to be a Grandma and ask her how exactly putting Bubba in charge of the economy is going to put people back to work.

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

Takes two to tango. Obama signaled early on that he had no intention of compromising.

 

[rightwinger]

Where did Hillary ever say Bill would be in charge of the economy

Here.

During a speech in Kentucky Sunday she referred to "my husband, who I will put in charge of revitalizing the economy 'cause he knows what he's doing."

Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

Takes two to tango. Obama signaled early on that he had no intention of compromising.

You can't tango when the other partner refuses to take the floor

Republicans vowed they would not support Obama on ANY initiative. Their record reveals they didn't

 

[mudwhistle]

Does shit stink?

 

[hadit]

Here.
Hillary Clinton says she'll put Bill 'in charge' of fixing economy

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

Takes two to tango. Obama signaled early on that he had no intention of compromising.

You can't tango when the other partner refuses to take the floor

Republicans vowed they would not support Obama on ANY initiative. Their record reveals they didn't

What do you expect when one of the president's first statements was that they can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in the back of the bus, followed by completely ignoring them while ramming obamadon'tcare through?

 

[rhodescholar]

Fact is Hillary is not making the bizarre, unsupported, outright lies that Trump makes on a daily basis

She's just committing more and more crimes every day like using foreign $$ for her campaign, and lying about her use of a non-governmental email server for classified messages.

 

[rightwinger]

Interesting

We did have a great economy under Bill though

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

Takes two to tango. Obama signaled early on that he had no intention of compromising.

You can't tango when the other partner refuses to take the floor

Republicans vowed they would not support Obama on ANY initiative. Their record reveals they didn't

What do you expect when one of the president's first statements was that they can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in the back of the bus, followed by completely ignoring them while ramming obamadon'tcare through?

Republicans met with the new President and started giving terms...they were put in their place

Republicans were urged and invited to participate in the development of Obamacare. They refused and as a result got nothing

 

[hadit]

We sure did, and here are some reasons why.

1. The dot com boom.
2. A Republican Congress that actually demanded more fiscal sanity and fought for it.
3. A pragmatic president who triangulated against the worst impulses of his party and compromised with the opposition.

I don't, however, see any of those being a reality this time around.

You can accomplish a lot when you don't have to deal with an opposition party obsessed with making you a one term president and refusing to cooperate on anything

Takes two to tango. Obama signaled early on that he had no intention of compromising.

You can't tango when the other partner refuses to take the floor

Republicans vowed they would not support Obama on ANY initiative. Their record reveals they didn't

What do you expect when one of the president's first statements was that they can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in the back of the bus, followed by completely ignoring them while ramming obamadon'tcare through?

Republicans met with the new President and started giving terms...they were put in their place

Republicans were urged and invited to participate in the development of Obamacare. They refused and as a result got nothing

Semantics. Obama signaled that he was unwilling to compromise on anything, and didn't.

 

[longknife]

Well, it seems to make sense that amounts donated to the Clinton campaign should indicate a preference for her over her opponent. So, who donated what?



$1,000,000-$5,000,000



Carlos Slim (Mexicaan national)

Chairman & CEO of Telmex, largest New York Times shareholder



James Murdoch

Chief Operating Officer of 21st Century Fox



Newsmax Media

Florida-based conservative media network



Thomson Reuters

Owner of the Reuters news service



$500,000-$1,000,000



Google



News Corporation Foundation

Philanthropic arm of former Fox News parent company



$250,000-$500,000



Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

Publisher



Richard Mellon Scaife

Owner of Pittsburgh Tribune-Review



$100,000-$250,000



Abigail Disney

Documentary filmmaker



Bloomberg Philanthropies



Howard Stringer

Former CBS, CBS News and Sony executive



Intermountain West Communications Company

Local television affiliate owner (formerly Sunbelt Communications)



$50,000-$100,000



Bloomberg L.P.



Discovery Communications Inc.



George Stephanopoulos

ABC News chief anchor and chief political correspondent



Mort Zuckerman

Owner of New York Daily News and U.S. News & World Report



Time Warner Inc.

Owner of CNN parent company Turner Broadcasting



$25,000-$50,000



AOL



HBO



Hollywood Foreign Press Association

Presenters of the Golden Globe Awards



Viacom



$10,000-$25,000



Knight Foundation

Non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting journalism



Public Radio International



Turner Broadcasting

Parent company of CNN



Twitter



$5,000-$10,000



Comcast

Parent copmany of NBCUniversal



NBC Universal

Parent company of NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC



Public Broadcasting Service



Story with links @ Solid Evidence That The Media Is Biased Against Donald Trump

What's really shameful is what the Clinton Foundation spends that money on - like wiping out malaria.

Don't get me wrong. I really do feel sorry for Drumpf. He gets blamed for ALMOST every lie he tells.

BTWd, where's Duh Donuld's tax returns? Hillary's are available on line going back to the 90s. What is he hiding?

Tax Return Shows Hillary Clinton Donated 100 Times More Money To Charity Than Trump

By Jason Easley on Fri, Aug 12th, 2016 at 2:20 pm

Hillary Clinton has released her and her husband's 2015 tax return, and it shows that they donated 9.8% of the gross income to charity. In contrast, reporters have been unable to find no individual donations that Trump made out of his own pocket to charity.

And all of that money went to the Clinton Foundation wwhich keeps 90% for administrative overhead (Clinton pockets) and sends the rest to so-called charities which never get to those in need. Haiti anyone?