Can any con here tell me the difference between a moderate liberal and an extremist?

[Duped]

The label extremist is usualy put on others by extremist. Recalcitrant would be a better term, but since the low information voter doesn't know what the hell it means, the liberal machine uses the former - it conjures up images of violence to demonize the opposition ie. muslim extremist.

What they are really saying is: if you don't support Obama, you are an extremist!

 

[occupied]

The label extremist is usualy put on others by extremist. Recalcitrant would be a better term, but since the low information voter doesn't know what the hell it means, the liberal machine uses the former - it conjures up images of violence to demonize the opposition ie. muslim extremist.

What they are really saying is: if you don't support Obama, you are an extremist!

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

 

[bripat9643]

The label extremist is usualy put on others by extremist. Recalcitrant would be a better term, but since the low information voter doesn't know what the hell it means, the liberal machine uses the former - it conjures up images of violence to demonize the opposition ie. muslim extremist.

What they are really saying is: if you don't support Obama, you are an extremist!

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

Using the debt limit as negotiating leverage is working within the bounds of the system, numb nuts. That isn't "wrecking the government."

Using hysterical language is a sure indication of an "extremist."

 

[bripat9643]

AS you can see the far left wants to spend without limits and constraints.

Although I doubt you would ever see the far left do this with their own money.

Yes, but those who object to this behavior are "extremists."

Democrats are nothing but a load of horseshit.

 

[Duped]

The label extremist is usualy put on others by extremist. Recalcitrant would be a better term, but since the low information voter doesn't know what the hell it means, the liberal machine uses the former - it conjures up images of violence to demonize the opposition ie. muslim extremist.

What they are really saying is: if you don't support Obama, you are an extremist!

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

Supporting socializm makes you unamerican. Anyone who does not belong to your cult is an extremist. Obama is the most inept, extremist president in history. Our government sucks! ACA is a huge debacle founded on ideology - only dumb ass ideologues support it!

 

[occupied]

The label extremist is usualy put on others by extremist. Recalcitrant would be a better term, but since the low information voter doesn't know what the hell it means, the liberal machine uses the former - it conjures up images of violence to demonize the opposition ie. muslim extremist.

What they are really saying is: if you don't support Obama, you are an extremist!

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

Supporting socializm makes you unamerican. Anyone who does not belong to your cult is an extremist. Obama is the most inept, extremist president in history. Our government sucks! ACA is a huge debacle founded on ideology - only dumb ass ideologues support it!

Whoa! Settle down there cowboy, the attitude that the system is entirely rigged towards socialism IS an extremist view no matter how you cut it because the system is rigged to favor big business interests over the little guy, still socialism of a sort, just not the kind you seem to think is operating here. Big business owns the government, you should have no worries that the rabble are going to get anything that will really help them.

 

[bripat9643]

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

Supporting socializm makes you unamerican. Anyone who does not belong to your cult is an extremist. Obama is the most inept, extremist president in history. Our government sucks! ACA is a huge debacle founded on ideology - only dumb ass ideologues support it!

Whoa! Settle down there cowboy, the attitude that the system is entirely rigged towards socialism IS an extremist view no matter how you cut it because the system is rigged to favor big business interests over the little guy, still socialism of a sort, just not the kind you seem to think is operating here. Big business owns the government, you should have no worries that the rabble are going to get anything that will really help them.

That's extremist socialist propaganda.

 

[rdean]

You have no proof of any sort that it worked. The rate of job loss was already well underway for the Stimulus was pass, and it took even longer before any of the money was spent.



Since you're a dumbass, I'll repeat it for you: The fact is unemployment started a sharp decline the day Obama was inaugurated. (for dumb asses, that means before he could pass any legislation) It shows that the Obama Administration had nothing to do with the decrease in the rate of job loss. It was already well underway before Obama and his minions had a chance to do a thing.



What the hell are you talking about?

Don't be stupid about this. The sharp decline happened months before Obama was inaugerated. It leveled out and the economy began to create jobs when the stimulus came into effect. The jobs we lost in his first few months were not his fault. How could they be? The decline began with Bush.

Nope. It started the day he was inaugurated:

Obama signed the so-called "Stimulus" Feb 19, 2009," but most of the spending didn't kick in until much later.

That's ridiculous. Nothing starts the very day someone takes office. Bush's last budget was in effect nearly the entire first year of his administration not to mention Bush freaking out the last six months of his administration when the damage from all that GOP deregulation finally "caught up".

 

[cutter]

A moderate liberal is an extremist that lies about his political position and tells you what he thinks you want to hear. A moderate democrat is a extremist voter dumb enough to believe his party's leaders.

 

[1776]

The moderate liberal is a follower or a political outsider that lies non-stop that their fellow libs aren't violating the law, attacking conservatives, etc. (30-something schmuck that posts here)

The extreme liberal is the leader of their pack of goons actually going out and doing evil/illegal things to win an election and stay in power. (SEIU goon, Democrap politican)

 

[Duped]

Not supporting ACA does make not you an extremist, trying to wreck the government because you do not have the ability to kill it within the bounds of the system makes you an extremist.

Supporting socializm makes you unamerican. Anyone who does not belong to your cult is an extremist. Obama is the most inept, extremist president in history. Our government sucks! ACA is a huge debacle founded on ideology - only dumb ass ideologues support it!

Whoa! Settle down there cowboy, the attitude that the system is entirely rigged towards socialism IS an extremist view no matter how you cut it because the system is rigged to favor big business interests over the little guy, still socialism of a sort, just not the kind you seem to think is operating here. Big business owns the government, you should have no worries that the rabble are going to get anything that will really help them.

Obamacare was intended as single payer - if not outright, a cornerstone. When the government controls life, and death, and commandeers 1/6 of the economy through subterfuge, what do you call it? Money will always influence power, and power will always influence money - that is the way of things. It is called buisness; competition!

 

[Avorysuds]

This thread does a great job showing the difference between a reasonable liberal minded person and a far lefty nutter. If you believe the stimulus worked despite failing so remarkably that even Obama admits it failed, then you're a far lefty nutter.

Now Obama admitting it failed does not make him a moderate, he passed the stimulus after alll... He was told it would fail, why it would fail and how it would fail. The stimulus did not meet a single benchmark Obama and his admin themselves set.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't be extending UE benefits that were passed as an "emergency" 4-5 years ago, today.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't have far less people actually working today than in 2009, or 2010, or 2011... or 2012.....

If the stimulus had worked the FED wouldn't have printed over 2 trillion dollars and just as of this last month "tapered" spending to a whopping 75 billion a month.


So:

Stimulus worked! = far left hack

I wanted the stimulus to work but it didn't.... = Moderate Democrat

The stimulus was bullshit! = Republican

The stimulus prolonged the recession and here is why "_____________" Constitutional conservative/Libertarian.

 

[Billy000]

This thread does a great job showing the difference between a reasonable liberal minded person and a far lefty nutter. If you believe the stimulus worked despite failing so remarkably that even Obama admits it failed, then you're a far lefty nutter.

Now Obama admitting it failed does not make him a moderate, he passed the stimulus after alll... He was told it would fail, why it would fail and how it would fail. The stimulus did not meet a single benchmark Obama and his admin themselves set.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't be extending UE benefits that were passed as an "emergency" 4-5 years ago, today.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't have far less people actually working today than in 2009, or 2010, or 2011... or 2012.....

If the stimulus had worked the FED wouldn't have printed over 2 trillion dollars and just as of this last month "tapered" spending to a whopping 75 billion a month.


So:

Stimulus worked! = far left hack

I wanted the stimulus to work but it didn't.... = Moderate Democrat

The stimulus was bullshit! = Republican

The stimulus prolonged the recession and here is why "_____________" Constitutional conservative/Libertarian.

Just because the stimulus didn't do as well as promised doesn't mean it didn't work. It still turned a free fall of jobs into job growth. It is the reason we are even in a recovery. The problem is that it was too small.

 

[bripat9643]

This thread does a great job showing the difference between a reasonable liberal minded person and a far lefty nutter. If you believe the stimulus worked despite failing so remarkably that even Obama admits it failed, then you're a far lefty nutter.

Now Obama admitting it failed does not make him a moderate, he passed the stimulus after alll... He was told it would fail, why it would fail and how it would fail. The stimulus did not meet a single benchmark Obama and his admin themselves set.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't be extending UE benefits that were passed as an "emergency" 4-5 years ago, today.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't have far less people actually working today than in 2009, or 2010, or 2011... or 2012.....

If the stimulus had worked the FED wouldn't have printed over 2 trillion dollars and just as of this last month "tapered" spending to a whopping 75 billion a month.


So:

Stimulus worked! = far left hack

I wanted the stimulus to work but it didn't.... = Moderate Democrat

The stimulus was bullshit! = Republican

The stimulus prolonged the recession and here is why "_____________" Constitutional conservative/Libertarian.

Just because the stimulus didn't do as well as promised doesn't mean it didn't work. It still turned a free fall of jobs into job growth. It is the reason we are even in a recovery. The problem is that it was too small.

You are truly hopeless. When did you have a lobotomy?

 

[HenryBHough]

Doesn't Obamacare cover (indeed, encourage) lobotomies?

 

[Billy000]

This thread does a great job showing the difference between a reasonable liberal minded person and a far lefty nutter. If you believe the stimulus worked despite failing so remarkably that even Obama admits it failed, then you're a far lefty nutter.

Now Obama admitting it failed does not make him a moderate, he passed the stimulus after alll... He was told it would fail, why it would fail and how it would fail. The stimulus did not meet a single benchmark Obama and his admin themselves set.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't be extending UE benefits that were passed as an "emergency" 4-5 years ago, today.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't have far less people actually working today than in 2009, or 2010, or 2011... or 2012.....

If the stimulus had worked the FED wouldn't have printed over 2 trillion dollars and just as of this last month "tapered" spending to a whopping 75 billion a month.


So:

Stimulus worked! = far left hack

I wanted the stimulus to work but it didn't.... = Moderate Democrat

The stimulus was bullshit! = Republican

The stimulus prolonged the recession and here is why "_____________" Constitutional conservative/Libertarian.

Just because the stimulus didn't do as well as promised doesn't mean it didn't work. It still turned a free fall of jobs into job growth. It is the reason we are even in a recovery. The problem is that it was too small.

You are truly hopeless. When did you have a lobotomy?

Your denial is so juvenile.

 

[asterism]

Show me the proof that it didn't kick in until much later. That's bullshit.

The Reason That Shovel Ready Stimulus Didn't Work Is That There Wasn't Any Stimulus - Forbes

As President Obama urges Congress to pass the $800 billion-plus stimulus package, one of his favorite selling points is the thousands of projects nationwide that he calls “shovel ready” — meaning planning is complete, approvals are secured and people could be put to work right away once funding is in place.

There is no formal definition for shovel ready. The Federal Highway Administration says it doesn’t use the phrase. Its preferred term is “ready to go,” according to acting administrator Jeff Paniati.

That means a state has already done the preliminary work for that project, he says.

“They’ve addressed all the environmental requirements as required,” Paniati says. “They’ve done the necessary public outreach. In many cases, the design work is already completed … and that they’re on an approved state list.”

One example of a shovel-ready project is the in the notoriously traffic-clogged suburbs of Northern Virginia outside Washington, D.C. The state wants to widen the roads and has done some of the preliminary work, but the project is on hold because Virginia doesn’t have the final $32 million needed to complete it.

The stimulus bill states that for a project to be considered shovel-ready, it must be ready to begin in 90 days. The has a list of almost 19,000 such projects, adding up to almost $150 billion.

I quote at such length as this really was what was touted as the way out of the then current problems.

This is what the kids call an epic fail.

Forbes.com wow. You might as well have come up with Fox News as a source.

This is a very opinionated therefore bias, but either way this article is all about infrastructure. The main focus of the stimulus package was extending unemployment benefits. That is what most of the 787 billion was.

Your article is bias, misleading, and worst of all irrelevant.

That's not true:

Unemployment Extend and increase unemployment compensation » $35.8 billion

The Stimulus Plan: How to Spend $787 Billion - The New York Times

Less than 5% went towards extending unemployment benefits.

 

[asterism]

This thread does a great job showing the difference between a reasonable liberal minded person and a far lefty nutter. If you believe the stimulus worked despite failing so remarkably that even Obama admits it failed, then you're a far lefty nutter.

Now Obama admitting it failed does not make him a moderate, he passed the stimulus after alll... He was told it would fail, why it would fail and how it would fail. The stimulus did not meet a single benchmark Obama and his admin themselves set.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't be extending UE benefits that were passed as an "emergency" 4-5 years ago, today.

If the stimulus had worked we wouldn't have far less people actually working today than in 2009, or 2010, or 2011... or 2012.....

If the stimulus had worked the FED wouldn't have printed over 2 trillion dollars and just as of this last month "tapered" spending to a whopping 75 billion a month.


So:

Stimulus worked! = far left hack

I wanted the stimulus to work but it didn't.... = Moderate Democrat

The stimulus was bullshit! = Republican

The stimulus prolonged the recession and here is why "_____________" Constitutional conservative/Libertarian.

Just because the stimulus didn't do as well as promised doesn't mean it didn't work. It still turned a free fall of jobs into job growth. It is the reason we are even in a recovery. The problem is that it was too small.

You're saying that the stimulus is the reason we're in a recovery but the economy is worse than even the Obama administration predicted it would be WITHOUT the stimulus. That's very faulty logic.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I don't think any of you can. I have never seen anyone here make the distinction. You instead choose to believe all liberals think the same way as if we are part of some giant clubhouse. I wish you understood how simple minded this kind of thinking is.

Or better yet, how about you also explain the difference between a moderate conservative and a conservative extremist,

You go on about being simple minded, and then you write this.. how ironic.

So, in you open minded world there are only two kinds of conservatives, extremists and moderates.

What a simpleton you are.

 

[bripat9643]

Here's the difference: the later exists. the former doesn't.

BTW, deenie, "extremist" isn't a euphemism meaning "Republican."

Failed "trickle down" economic policy.

Trillions in debt for "freeing" a Middle Eastern theocracy that hates our guts.

Letting Bin Laden go scott free.

"Let him die" masquerading as "health care".

A redistribution of wealth to the top 1%.

Wrecking the economy.

Hatred for education and science.

If that isn't "extremist", then what is?

You loon.

You have no idea what the Trickle Down theory is.

It is BUSINESS as we all know it and need it to be.

I've always said that "trickle down" is the libturd word meaning "capitalism."