Can Anti-Same Sex M Advocates Address These Facts?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CurveLight, Dec 31, 2009.

  1. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315
    We are all familiar with the claim SSM should not be allowed because it is immoral and will send an atomic wedgie up the nuclear family's fanny. Thus the strongest claim against SSM is for preservation of our Republic. On the question of its moral value: It does not matter. It truly does not. I think it's immoral for Christian churches, who operate tax free, to erect structures in the name of Christ, preach about the Love of God and the call to Sacrifice, then lock the doors to keep the homeless out. Does my indignation based on my moral compass justify robbing those Churches of their rights? No. The Constitution guarantees them the Right to gloriously display their hypocrisy on a regular basis. (this does not apply to all Christian churches, but the majority of US churches are guilty of following Caesar instead of Christ.) The cry of a moral crime without the justification of intrusion is a selfish microphone indeed.

    Massachusetts has often been the iconic ridicule of radio pundits and Christian religious groups who claim it is a great example of the product of immorality, and especially in the Same Sex M debate. This demonstrates the fundamental cognitive dissonance of mob mentality. Here is why: MA has long been a leader in respecting and protecting the sanctity of Marriage. We are approaching a 20 year celebration of having the lowest divorce rates of any State in the entire nation:

    "Massachusetts and Connecticut rank first and second, respectively, for having the lowest divorce rates in the nation, according to new 1994 divorce data from the National Center for Health Statistics."
    STATE-BY-STATE DIVORCE RATES


    That was a time when SSM was being lobbied here. Let's jump a decade and see those numbers:


    "The District of Columbia had the lowest reported divorce rate, at 1.7, followed by Massachusetts at 2.2 and Pennsylvania at 2.5."
    Divorce Statistics, Marriage Statistics: Divorce Rates in America, Marriage

    It was around that time the Constitution chalked up another victory of being a more honest National manifesto. The anti-SSM crowds were ballistic with predictions. Five years later:



    Provisional 2008 data from the CDC's National Vital Statistics Report show that after over four years of legal same-sex marriage, the divorce rate in Massachusetts has actually dropped, from 2.3 per thousand residents in 2007 to about 2.0 per thousand in 2008, the lowest rate in the nation—and one that hasn’t been seen since the 1940's.
    Low Massachusetts divorce rate another defeat for same-sex marriage opponents


    Wow. If that is the type of destruction gays bring to the sanctity of marriage and society I am scared as hell to find out what good it could possibly accomplish.

    Iam not citing the data in a claim of causation and saying SSM made divorce rates go down. I am citing it to show the argument of causation put forth by anti-SSM crowds that Same Sex Marriage causes enough harm on society to justify burning portions of the Constitution is simply too damn gay to be true.
     
  2. slackjawed
    Offline

    slackjawed Self deported

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,307
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    15th congressional district of Arizona
    Ratings:
    +645
    Personally I don't care who marries who.
    But your post is only going to attract those that already agree and piss off those that don't.
    I might be the only one that simply doesn't care......eat what you want and I'll do the same.
     
  3. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315

    I'm optimistic opponents will approach the challenge with honesty and a genuine attempt to explain how their causation argument is seriously depleted by the available info.
     
  4. Zona
    Offline

    Zona A guy in ariZONA

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    13,874
    Thanks Received:
    941
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ.
    Ratings:
    +942
    Rove, newt, Rush, since the homo's are the ones destroying the sanctity of marriage, do you have a comment on your divorces.
     
  5. Brubricker
    Offline

    Brubricker Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Ratings:
    +34
    Legalizing same-sex marriage would send the message that it's OK to be gay. That's how I've always viewed the motives of those opposed to it. But hey, I'm for making it legal so I could be wrong.
     
  6. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,299
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,306
    I've heard that gay men stick their weiners in each other's butt holes. What's up with that?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  7. CurveLight
    Offline

    CurveLight BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,768
    Thanks Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +315
    That's a lower tiered argument. The focus has always been creating fear by claiming SSM would ruin "real" marriage. That is based on the circular position the absence of traditional marriage is invariably the presence of an extinct society.
     
  8. Brubricker
    Offline

    Brubricker Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    Ratings:
    +34
    You call it a lower-tiered argument. I say it's the whole basis of their point of view. In their minds, homosexuality is just plain wrong and any move which seems to legitimize it is to be opposed. It's no more complicated than that.
     
  9. Sunni Man
    Offline

    Sunni Man Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,001
    Thanks Received:
    5,328
    Trophy Points:
    1,860
    Location:
    Patriotic American Muslim
    Ratings:
    +12,443
    Ewwww!!! That's just dog nasty!!!!!! :eek:
     
  10. gautama
    Offline

    gautama BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,355
    Thanks Received:
    336
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +336

    WADDAYAMEAN "what's up with that "?????

    IT'S ROMANCE !!!!!

    DONCHA KNOW WHAT ROMANCE IS ??????
     

Share This Page