Cameron Challenges Sceptics to Debate then Chickens Out!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Aug 23, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,360
    Thanks Received:
    8,301
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +21,809
    That paragon of virtue, bravery, and champion of the environment challenged three big named sceptics to a climate change debate. They agreed to all of his conditions which included NO RECORDING OF THE EXCHANGE and then he chickened out anyways!

    What a loser!

    The Macon Daily- News, Classifieds, Weather, Sports, Current Events, Real Estate, Display Advertising...

    http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/blog/general/481-james-cameronking-of-hypocrites

    From King of the World to Chicken of the Sea: Director James Cameron challenges climate skeptics to debate and then bails out at last minute | Climate Depot
     
  2. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,853
    Thanks Received:
    13,036
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,623
    can't find any legitimate sites talking about the cancellation.
     
  3. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,360
    Thanks Received:
    8,301
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +21,809
  4. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,360
    Thanks Received:
    8,301
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +21,809
  5. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    42,360
    Thanks Received:
    8,301
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +21,809
  6. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,293
    Thanks Received:
    1,086
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,532
    While I understand it is always more difficult to defend a complex position than to attack one, it seems that the skeptical side usually 'wins' these debates as far as audience opinion goes.
    It would be more useful to have a scientifically literate audience debate the issues but that would involve a respected journal and reasonably open access. Sort of like peer review before it was hijacked. If the case for AGW was so solid as to be considered 'settled science', why isn't there a forum available for both sides to state their cases? Surely openness would benefit both sides in getting the truth out.
     

Share This Page