Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[Winco]

Post number 754. "Actuations"

Last chance. Post where I accused you of being an "indoctrinator".

You lean right.
And support EVERYTHING right, until they (your ILK) attacks Education.
Then you get defensive.

When I speak of "Indoctrination" I speak of the multiple RWI's. (Right Wing Idiots) that accuse me of an indoctrination expert along with being a pedophile.

You support this group SweetSue92 as long as they are attacking me.

 

[SweetSue92]

You lean right.
And support EVERYTHING right, until they (your ILK) attacks Education.
Then you get defensive.

When I speak of "Indoctrination" I speak of the multiple RWI's. (Right Wing Idiots) that accuse me of an indoctrination expert along with being a pedophile.

You support this group SweetSue92 as long as they are attacking me.

Liar.

Reminder: you said that *I* called you an indoctrinator. I obviously did not, and you can't handle your own lies. That's first. Second, you realize this very same band of brothers calls ME a "groomer", right?

Honestly. Go sleep it off.

 

[Winco]

Liar.

Reminder: you said that *I* called you an indoctrinator. I obviously did not, and you can't handle your own lies. That's first. Second, you realize this very same band of brothers calls ME a "groomer", right?

Honestly. Go sleep it off.

Oh So_called Sweet Sue.

When I speak of "Indoctrination" I speak of the multiple RWI's. (Right Wing Idiots) that accuse me of an indoctrination expert along with being a pedophile.

Sorry if you assumed otherwise.

 

[SweetSue92]

Oh So_called Sweet Sue.

Sorry if you assumed otherwise.

I didn't have to "assume". You said it, and anyone can read it.

Now go sleep it off.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

can we ask them if they are a groomer,, or more directly a pedophile??

its an honest question, more so when they defend such actions,,

Yes, you may. In doing that, all we ask is that you have a few reasons for asking that. Quotes from that person's replies (links are always good) will suffice. Make your case when you ask.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

With all due respect, I like her personally, but Aye should have known what kind of trouble it would bring when starting this thread and telling us not to call the pedos names and be nice to them. Yeah right! Like hell that I want to do that.

Did you react the same way when FCT discussed this in a seperate thread months ago? If not, why?

What I'm seeing from several of you is that you're upset we don't allow people to reply to others with one word responses or a few words as a response ("groomer", "you're a groomer". What is so hard about quoting a reply and then saying something to the effect of, "Why do you agree with that? / Why would you say that? That response makes people think you are/could be a groomer."

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

is anybody smart enough to take note that the moderator who holds all the power is trying to portray herself as the victim of a person who holds no power at all? Do you see how she is framing it as me trying to force HER out, even when one of her buddies has told me to leave several times? Do you see how she is accusing me of what SHE is doing about cultivating supporters and whatnot?

These are some classic tactics of a malignant narcissist, folks. Eveything gets turned around so THEY are the one who has been maligned, THEY are the one who has been targeted and they are the victim. She insinuates VERY strongly that I am a pedophile and then claims I am the one who has been doing so.

She has always used this crap in the supersecret mod room and it has always worked. When the malignant narcissist goes after its prey, it seeks to isolate them. The prey is just a malcontent. The prey is off their rocker. The prey is out of line. It is all about gaslighting, folks.


MANY people have had the same experience as I have. Many are here in this thread. I realize the mods are too clueless to know what she is doing, but I trust others here who have experienced it first hand.

She is now crying that the big bad man who doesn't like child abuse is driving her away from this forum that she has been serving so selflessly for all these years. She is sending out the call to all the faithful to come get that bad man who opposes child abuse or she just might leave!

How many people are buying this manipulative act?

S

Just sent you a warning for this reply. Reason being, this post is typical of many you have posted in this thread that is OFF TOPIC and PERSONAL against another forum member. Just putting this out here for everyone to see, for transparency and all that.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

They rewarded him by giving him the keys to the kingdom.

While I would have expected such things by a couple of the mods, I am absolutely flabbergasted that the others support this crap, too.

That is an outright lie and you know it.

 

[flacaltenn]

What about pointing out that some members seem to be groomer enablers or is that not allowed either?
When someone is advocating pro groomer/pedo acts or policy, calling them a groomer enabler is simply stating a fact.

There's not a clear line for "groomer enablers". It's mighty squiggly because I've asked the membership before in this Announcement forum "How many groomers ARE THERE on USMB?" And only 2 brave dissenters replied --

"Every leftist on USMB".

That's why we ban the nuclear flames of attacking members on "family, beasty, pedo". Because it causes members to pull up short of using those 3 things to flame other members. Otherwise, they all would be used indiscriminately. And it saves us from mod staff inconsistency on nebulous concepts of what is excessive flaming.

Not buying that a groomer or pedo ENABLER is just anyone that chronically votes the OPPOSITE of the way that you vote. If you THINK some member is bragging about inappropriate actions with children -- bring it to mod staff and dont wreck threads with the "groomer/pedo" tag.

 

[flacaltenn]

No it is not.
An enabler is not the same as someone who perpetrates the crime.
Words have meaning. Don't twist them or imply they don't.

For instance, if I said a post sounds like something a groomer enabler would say, it is not the same as calling the poster a groomer.
As a matter of fact, that isn't even an accusation, it is stating an opinion.
Is an opinion now banned?

This is a personal OPINION about another member. We dont care if you react to news and events and call THOSE actors groomers or "groomer enabler". There's not a ban on the word or your opinion unless it's solely directed at another member. Folks arguing about age of consent or age appropriate library books are have a discussion about an issue. NO NEED to get personal with another member.

DEFEND your position and dismantle THEIRS!!!!!

 

[flacaltenn]

What word do you want people to use to describe the act of providing gay pornography to young children?

If they are NOT A member -- feel free to do just that.

BTW - How MANY USMB members do you know that are "providing gay pornography to young children"?????

Sorry I just realized this thread closed.. I didn't make it past the 1st page.