1.Perhaps it’s too much to expect of Democrat voters to have had an actual education, via the bastions of Liberalism….but let’s take the leap of faith necessary, and imagine that they’d heard the phrase that appears as the thread’s title.
“This phrase comes directly from a story about the Roman ruler Julius Caesar. A man named Publius Clodius Pulcher sneaked into a party with the intention of seducing Caesar’s wife, Pompeia. This led to Publius’s arrest and trial.
After the trial, Caesar divorced Pompeia. When people questioned what this might have had to do with the trial of Publius, Caesar said,
My wife ought not even to be under suspicion.”
Because Pompeia was under suspicion of illicit behavior, Caesar felt that he had to divorce her to protect his dignity.”
What Does Caesar’s Wife Must Be Above Suspicion Mean? - Writing Explained
2.I fervently hope that the lesson is not lost with respect to what we have learned about our FBI and DoJ officials.
Here is the mission statement as it applies to the guardians of our legal system:
"The right to be tried by an impartial judge is deeply embedded in American jurisprudence; in fact, this right has often been considered to be the “cornerstone” of the American legal system."
Bias or an Appearance of Bias - Judicial Disqualification Resource Center
3. From the very start, and before the Trump pretense, the major players were dirty, and open to more than suspicion.
We learned in May 2015 with the publication of a book called Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, an exposé of alleged Clinton Foundation corruption written by Peter Schweizer, that the Obama administration rubber stamped the sale of 20% of our uranium to Russia.
Just coincidentally, while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, involving the transfer of U.S. uranium reserves to the new Russian owners of an international mining operation in exchange for $145 million in 'donations' to the Clinton Foundation.
And…
“…Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times,…” Fact check: No, the Clintons were not paid millions by Russia
Who else was involved in that series of ‘coincidences’?????
Guess.
Revealed next.
“This phrase comes directly from a story about the Roman ruler Julius Caesar. A man named Publius Clodius Pulcher sneaked into a party with the intention of seducing Caesar’s wife, Pompeia. This led to Publius’s arrest and trial.
After the trial, Caesar divorced Pompeia. When people questioned what this might have had to do with the trial of Publius, Caesar said,
My wife ought not even to be under suspicion.”
Because Pompeia was under suspicion of illicit behavior, Caesar felt that he had to divorce her to protect his dignity.”
What Does Caesar’s Wife Must Be Above Suspicion Mean? - Writing Explained
2.I fervently hope that the lesson is not lost with respect to what we have learned about our FBI and DoJ officials.
Here is the mission statement as it applies to the guardians of our legal system:
"The right to be tried by an impartial judge is deeply embedded in American jurisprudence; in fact, this right has often been considered to be the “cornerstone” of the American legal system."
Bias or an Appearance of Bias - Judicial Disqualification Resource Center
3. From the very start, and before the Trump pretense, the major players were dirty, and open to more than suspicion.
We learned in May 2015 with the publication of a book called Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, an exposé of alleged Clinton Foundation corruption written by Peter Schweizer, that the Obama administration rubber stamped the sale of 20% of our uranium to Russia.
Just coincidentally, while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, involving the transfer of U.S. uranium reserves to the new Russian owners of an international mining operation in exchange for $145 million in 'donations' to the Clinton Foundation.
And…
“…Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times,…” Fact check: No, the Clintons were not paid millions by Russia
Who else was involved in that series of ‘coincidences’?????
Guess.
Revealed next.
Last edited:
