Bush Buys Volt

Star

Gold Member
Apr 5, 2009
2,532
614
190
A non-insane Republican?-----could this be true?



George H.W. Bush
Buys Evil Socialist Chevy Volt
For His Son



Yeah, I bought a Volt. Wanna make something of it?





Yes, it’s true! Ex-President George Herbert Walker Bush gave the much maligned Chevy Volt to his son, Neil, for his birthday. The Volt, a electric/gas hybrid developed and built domestically by General Motors is a symbol of a recuperating manufacturing sector and the auto industry bailout. As such, it has been attacked repeatedly by the right for the sole purpose of undermining President Obama.

But there is a growing number of non-insane conservatives that are bucking the trend. Some, like Lee Spieckerman, owner of SpieckermanMedia have actually gone on Fox to debunk the garbage flowing from the mindless critics. According to the Huffington Post:
Spieckerman said he believes electric cars and plug-in hybrids like the Chevy Volt are vital to the nation’s future, allowing the country to wean itself off oil and use homegrown fuel sources like coal, nuclear and natural gas to power electricity plants, which then would power cars. If you could do that while also expanding the production of oil in the U.S., he thinks that could even push down gas prices.
Another conservative, Bob Lutz, former high muckity muck at GM and self-admitted global warming denier had this to say:
I am, sadly, coming to the conclusion that all the icons of conservatism are (shock, horror!) deliberately not telling the truth! (we on the left have known this for decades, welcome to the real world – FLS)

This saddens me, because, to this writer, conservatism IS fundamental truth. It only damages its inherent credibility with momentarily convenient fiction. (we’re waaaay past damaged credibility – FLS)

So, Mr. Krauthammer joins the list of right-wing pundits I no longer take seriously. After all, how do I know they’re telling the truth when the subject is one I’m not as familiar with as the Volt? (that’s easy: if their lips are moving, it’s probably a lie – FLS)
But the crown jewel of push back, by far, is former president, George H.W. Bush. The purchase is pure symbolism. Poppy Bush is still a multimillionaire, Neil is by no means middle class and neither would ever need worry about gas mileage. The was a very deliberate message that conservatives should support the Volt for everything that it represents and that conservatives claim to believe in. But I think it will fall on deaf ears as the current drop of conservatives don’t believe in anything at all except opposition to Obama. They are heavily invested in cutting off their nose to spite their face and the ghost of Ronald Reagan himself could not change the path they’ve chosen.
 
Why is this pertinent at all?


The Volt has been named the "Motor Trend Car of the Year", the European version of the Chevrolet Volt (Opel Ampera) has recently been named the European COTY, just last week the Volt was named the fourth "Best Car For The Money" in American showrooms and, and earned a "Five Star Safety Rating" but-----BUT rightwing talkers have been badmouthing American business and labor. Why is this pertinent?-------a better question would be, why are rightwing extremists trying to sabotage American business and labor?----old school conservatives/Republicans are/would be appalled by the slime on the right-hand side of the swamp. Good on GHWB for going 'all in' with his purchase of a Chevy Volt.
 
The Volt remains a very poor selling car. That's why production was halted.

Since it would take the Volt 27 years to be of any real cost savings, it isn't surprising that people have rejected it, no matter how many expert reports there are of its superority. There was a report recently that people who bought electric or hybrid cars aren't keeping them but trading them in as soon as they could. The exception is the Toyota Prius. Ford recently eliminated the hybrid Escape from its product line because of poor sales.

Study: Hybrid car owners unlikely to buy another - Dash - CBS News
 
The Volt remains a very poor selling car. That's why production was halted.

Since it would take the Volt 27 years to be of any real cost savings, it isn't surprising that people have rejected it, no matter how many expert reports there are of its superority. There was a report recently that people who bought electric or hybrid cars aren't keeping them but trading them in as soon as they could. The exception is the Toyota Prius. Ford recently eliminated the hybrid Escape from its product line because of poor sales.

Study: Hybrid car owners unlikely to buy another - Dash - CBS News

Bullshit.
 
The Volt remains a very poor selling car. That's why production was halted.

Since it would take the Volt 27 years to be of any real cost savings, it isn't surprising that people have rejected it, no matter how many expert reports there are of its superority. There was a report recently that people who bought electric or hybrid cars aren't keeping them but trading them in as soon as they could. The exception is the Toyota Prius. Ford recently eliminated the hybrid Escape from its product line because of poor sales.

Study: Hybrid car owners unlikely to buy another - Dash - CBS News

Bullshit.
Masterful refutation.

Oh, wait...no, it wasn't. :lol:
 
It doesn't take much to blow some peoples skirts up..

this is some earth shattering news that a site called addicting info has to do a HUGE writeup on it.

ALL over a stupid fucking CAR

:cuckoo:
 
The Volt remains a very poor selling car. That's why production was halted.

Since it would take the Volt 27 years to be of any real cost savings, it isn't surprising that people have rejected it, no matter how many expert reports there are of its superority. There was a report recently that people who bought electric or hybrid cars aren't keeping them but trading them in as soon as they could. The exception is the Toyota Prius. Ford recently eliminated the hybrid Escape from its product line because of poor sales.

Study: Hybrid car owners unlikely to buy another - Dash - CBS News

Bullshit.
Masterful refutation.

Oh, wait...no, it wasn't. :lol:

Impotently lashing out in other threads because you can no longer post in the thread you said you were never going to post in again?

Oh, wait...yes, you did! :lol:
 
Really, it pays to look something up BEFORE posting foolishness


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/b...off-owners-must-wait.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

The Volt, which cost nearly $40,000 before a $7,500 federal tax credit, could take up to 27 years to pay off versus a Chevrolet Cruze, assuming it was regularly driven farther than its battery-only range allows. The payback time could drop to about eight years if gas cost $5 a gallon and the driver remained exclusively on battery power.

The Lundberg Survey, which tracks fuel prices, said in March that gas prices would need to reach $12.50 a gallon for the Volt to make sense purely on financial terms. It said the Leaf would be competitive with gas at $8.53 a gallon.

The Volt makes the most sense for people who don't drive very far on a daily basis and only occasionally drive more than 30 miles a day. People who work close to home or from home and use the car for grocery store, errands, maybe a gym run once a day with a few out of immediate area needs will be quite happy with the Volt.
 
The Volt remains a very poor selling car. That's why production was halted.

Since it would take the Volt 27 years to be of any real cost savings, it isn't surprising that people have rejected it, no matter how many expert reports there are of its superority. There was a report recently that people who bought electric or hybrid cars aren't keeping them but trading them in as soon as they could. The exception is the Toyota Prius. Ford recently eliminated the hybrid Escape from its product line because of poor sales.

Study: Hybrid car owners unlikely to buy another - Dash - CBS News
After Record Sales, Chevy Volt Production Will Resume One Week Early

More bad news for the Make America Fail crowd, I'm afraid. Despite the concerted efforts of the conservatives to root against American innovation and ingenuity, the Chevy Volt survives. It seems that the American public would prefer to have a more affordable, more economical, American made car than to simply oppose anything the President supports simply because the President supports it. The Volt is far from a perfect car, but it is a step in the right direction. People who care about America should applaud the progress Detroit has made and not continue to waste their time and ours by once again hoping Americans will fail.

Article excerpt follows:
 
the Volt is a piece of shit ... what difference does it make who buys it. It doesn't change anything.
 
Really, it pays to look something up BEFORE posting foolishness


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/b...off-owners-must-wait.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

The Volt, which cost nearly $40,000 before a $7,500 federal tax credit, could take up to 27 years to pay off versus a Chevrolet Cruze, assuming it was regularly driven farther than its battery-only range allows. The payback time could drop to about eight years if gas cost $5 a gallon and the driver remained exclusively on battery power.

The Lundberg Survey, which tracks fuel prices, said in March that gas prices would need to reach $12.50 a gallon for the Volt to make sense purely on financial terms. It said the Leaf would be competitive with gas at $8.53 a gallon.

The Volt makes the most sense for people who don't drive very far on a daily basis and only occasionally drive more than 30 miles a day. People who work close to home or from home and use the car for grocery store, errands, maybe a gym run once a day with a few out of immediate area needs will be quite happy with the Volt.

Bullshit, like I said.

Why do people spend $35,000 on an Acura TL? Some of that is the performance, but a lot of it is that it is very close to a luxury sedan. The inside is beautiful.

Same argument for the Volvo S60 - it sometimes gets classified as a luxury car - even though a number of folks will buy it for the safety.

So, why shouldn't people want to pay for the near-luxury of the Chevy Volt? Have you read any of the reviews?
 
Really, it pays to look something up BEFORE posting foolishness


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/b...off-owners-must-wait.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

The Volt, which cost nearly $40,000 before a $7,500 federal tax credit, could take up to 27 years to pay off versus a Chevrolet Cruze, assuming it was regularly driven farther than its battery-only range allows. The payback time could drop to about eight years if gas cost $5 a gallon and the driver remained exclusively on battery power.

The Lundberg Survey, which tracks fuel prices, said in March that gas prices would need to reach $12.50 a gallon for the Volt to make sense purely on financial terms. It said the Leaf would be competitive with gas at $8.53 a gallon.

The Volt makes the most sense for people who don't drive very far on a daily basis and only occasionally drive more than 30 miles a day. People who work close to home or from home and use the car for grocery store, errands, maybe a gym run once a day with a few out of immediate area needs will be quite happy with the Volt.

Bullshit, like I said.

Why do people spend $35,000 on an Acura TL? Some of that is the performance, but a lot of it is that it is very close to a luxury sedan. The inside is beautiful.

Same argument for the Volvo S60 - it sometimes gets classified as a luxury car - even though a number of folks will buy it for the safety.

So, why shouldn't people want to pay for the near-luxury of the Chevy Volt? Have you read any of the reviews?

ahahahahahahaahahaha ... have you ever been up close to one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top