Brutal rape stopped by armed citizen....

[2aguy]

And here you have a man with a gun stopping a brutal rape......

Armed neighbor scares away suspect after brutal beating attempted rape

 

[M14 Shooter]

Anti-gun loons are incapable of an honest discussion about guns.
You know this.

 

[2aguy]

Anti-gun loons are incapable of an honest discussion about guns.
You know this.

Did you see the Kurt Schlichter piece I created a thread on.....it sums up the gun control debate perfectly.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Anti-gun loons are incapable of an honest discussion about guns.
You know this.

Did you see the Kurt Schlichter piece I created a thread on.....it sums up the gun control debate perfectly.....

No. Link?

 

[Mac1958]

 

[2aguy]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

 

[2aguy]

Anti-gun loons are incapable of an honest discussion about guns.
You know this.

Did you see the Kurt Schlichter piece I created a thread on.....it sums up the gun control debate perfectly.....

No. Link?

Enjoy....

Gun Rights Advocates Have A Devastating New Argument Against Gun Control. Here It Is.


American gun owners are beginning to respond with a fresh, powerful argument when facing anti-gun liberals. Here it is, in its entirety. Ready?

“Screw you.” That’s it. Except the first word isn’t “Screw.”

It’s not exactly a traditional argument, but it’s certainly appropriate here. The fact is that there is no point in arguing with liberal gun-control advocates because their argument is never in good faith. They slander gun owners as murderers. They lie about their ultimate aim, which is to ban and confiscate all privately owned weapons. And they adopt a pose of reasonability, yet their position is not susceptible to change because of evidence, facts or law. None of those matter – they already have their conclusion. This has to do with power – their power.

You can’t argue with someone who is lying about his position or whose position is not based upon reason. You can talk all day about how crime has diminished where concealed carry is allowed, while it flourishes in Democrat blue cities where gun control is tightest. You can point to statistics showing that law-abiding citizens who carry legally are exponentially less likely to commit gun crimes than other people. You can cite examples of armed citizens protecting themselves and their communities with guns. You can offer government statistics showing how the typical American is at many times greater risk of death from an automobile crash, a fall, or poisoning than from murder by gun.

But none of that matters, because this debate is not about facts. It’s about power. The liberal anti-gun narrative is not aimed at creating the best public policy but at disarming citizens the liberal elite looks down upon – and for whom weapons represent their last-ditch ability to respond to liberal overreach.

Put simply, liberal elitists don’t like the fact that, at the end of the day, an armed citizenry can tell them, “No.”

So they argue in bad faith, shamelessly lying, libeling their opponents, and hiding their real endgame. Sure, sometimes the mask slips and a liberal politician like Mike Bloomberg or Diane Feinstein reveals their true agenda, but mostly they stay on-message.

For example, Barack Obama, who always tries to reassure us bitter clingers that he doesn’t want to take our guns, speaks longingly about the Australian plan – which was confiscation of most viable defensive weapons from the civilian population.

Obama is lying – about gay marriage, about your doctor – and he is likewise lying about guns. The minute he could disarm every American civilian he would, something particularly alarming in light of his pal Bill Ayers’ infamous observation that ‘fundamentally transforming’ America would require killing at least 25 million citizens.

No wonder free Americans are done pretending the gun argument is a rational debate and are responding with an extended middle finger – and the challenge to come and take their arms. The fact remains that any outright attempt to take the arms from tens of millions of American gun owners would almost certainly result in a second Civil War. And we all know how the first Civil War went for the Democrats.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

 

[Uncensored2008]

And here you have a man with a gun stopping a brutal rape......

Armed neighbor scares away suspect after brutal beating attempted rape

I assume Obama is calling for tighter gun control after learning of this?

 

[2aguy]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Yeah...and if the guy is armed....? Considering no one was shot, and the guy ran away...another one where it won't get added to any stats.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Yeah...and if the guy is armed....? Considering no one was shot, and the guy ran away...another one where it won't get added to any stats.....

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Of course if you don't have a gun, you may well die for your effort, which is why leftists watch as people are murdered in the streets and won't even call the cops.

http://www.nytimes.com/1964/03/27/37-who-saw-murder-didnt-call-the-police.html?_r=0

 

[2aguy]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Yeah...and if the guy is armed....? Considering no one was shot, and the guy ran away...another one where it won't get added to any stats.....

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

Criminals do kill witnesses......

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Of course if you don't have a gun, you may well die for your effort, which is why leftists watch as people are murdered in the streets and won't even call the cops.

http://www.nytimes.com/1964/03/27/37-who-saw-murder-didnt-call-the-police.html?_r=0

With a gun you MAY die as well. One story about something isnt proof that no one will do anything.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What are you suggesting with this OP?

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Yeah...and if the guy is armed....? Considering no one was shot, and the guy ran away...another one where it won't get added to any stats.....

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

Criminals do kill witnesses......

Not all criminals

 

[MikeK]

Anti-gun loons are incapable of an honest discussion about guns.
You know this.

The majority of anti-gun fanatics are afraid of guns because they know absolutely nothing about them. Their antipathy is born of fear and their fear is predicated on ignorance.

 

[2aguy]

That the most effective way to stop a brutal rape is a gun. In the hand of the victim or a stranger trying to stop the rape.

I'm thinking gun or not the most effective way to intervene is to...intervene.

Yeah...and if the guy is armed....? Considering no one was shot, and the guy ran away...another one where it won't get added to any stats.....

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

Criminals do kill witnesses......

Not all criminals

Can you tell me which ones.....might be good to know?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

Yeah, because it's not like rape is a violent crime or anything.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

I dont believe that someone is going to have a goal to rape and then go on a shooting spree. The chances are higher that they'd run

Yeah, because it's not like rape is a violent crime or anything.....

Your pussy is safe, dont worry