strollingbones
Diamond Member
the only person who can tell us why is ck and he seems to be in the dark himself...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With an overabundance of 'gun' talk in so many threads, what's left to say? On the other hand, what could be said that would make a 'gun' forum exceptional (read not possible)?
Anyway, what would you choose for a 'boot gun'?
Civil liability might be the possible reason given the fact that lawyers are good at talking grieving family members into suing any and everyone that might (at the largest stretch of the imagination) be held responsible for a firearms related death. It wouldn't surprise me if the owner's lawyer advised removing the specifically targeted firearms sub-forum for liability reasons.winter the only answer i saw was ck saying it was a surprise to him that it was closed and that it was not coming back.....the latter part was surprising to me...at the time i said i think it might be some kinda legal issue
I would be curious to know what sort of legal issue would be present.
I heard the same thing, only from 2 mods. I simply never heard why.
Also, there are still plenty of gun posts. And given the vitriol that is spewed in the political forums, I'm amazed that the gun forum would be a legal issue.
If it is, why not simply say do? Do the people who populate these forums matter so little?
Well, I was just using it as an expression, really, meaning back-up piece, classically small in size and caliber (no problems with masculinity; after all, 007 carried a .25 semi).Anyway, what would you choose for a 'boot gun'?
I've never carried a gun in my boot.
Perhaps this was not well worded; the way you took it was not how it was intended. By 'exceptional' was meant more extreme than what is already all over a lot of other threads.With an overabundance of 'gun' talk in so many threads, what's left to say? On the other hand, what could be said that would make a 'gun' forum exceptional (read not possible)?
There are a number of topics about firearms that are exceptional. The fact that you are not interested is not the point.
Perhaps this was not well worded; the way you took it was not how it was intended. By 'exceptional' was meant more extreme than what is already all over a lot of other threads.With an overabundance of 'gun' talk in so many threads, what's left to say? On the other hand, what could be said that would make a 'gun' forum exceptional (read not possible)?
There are a number of topics about firearms that are exceptional. The fact that you are not interested is not the point.
And they might have a team of lawyers on retainer.Civil liability might be the possible reason given the fact that lawyers are good at talking grieving family members into suing any and everyone that might (at the largest stretch of the imagination) be held responsible for a firearms related death. It wouldn't surprise me if the owner's lawyer advised removing the specifically targeted firearms sub-forum for liability reasons.winter the only answer i saw was ck saying it was a surprise to him that it was closed and that it was not coming back.....the latter part was surprising to me...at the time i said i think it might be some kinda legal issue
I would be curious to know what sort of legal issue would be present.
I heard the same thing, only from 2 mods. I simply never heard why.
Also, there are still plenty of gun posts. And given the vitriol that is spewed in the political forums, I'm amazed that the gun forum would be a legal issue.
If it is, why not simply say do? Do the people who populate these forums matter so little?
I cant imagine thats the reason.
There are forums that are nothing but guns all over the internet.
And they might have a team of lawyers on retainer.Civil liability might be the possible reason given the fact that lawyers are good at talking grieving family members into suing any and everyone that might (at the largest stretch of the imagination) be held responsible for a firearms related death. It wouldn't surprise me if the owner's lawyer advised removing the specifically targeted firearms sub-forum for liability reasons.winter the only answer i saw was ck saying it was a surprise to him that it was closed and that it was not coming back.....the latter part was surprising to me...at the time i said i think it might be some kinda legal issue
I would be curious to know what sort of legal issue would be present.
I heard the same thing, only from 2 mods. I simply never heard why.
Also, there are still plenty of gun posts. And given the vitriol that is spewed in the political forums, I'm amazed that the gun forum would be a legal issue.
If it is, why not simply say do? Do the people who populate these forums matter so little?
I cant imagine thats the reason.
There are forums that are nothing but guns all over the internet.
Depends of who owns the board but hey, it's all speculation anyway.And they might have a team of lawyers on retainer.Civil liability might be the possible reason given the fact that lawyers are good at talking grieving family members into suing any and everyone that might (at the largest stretch of the imagination) be held responsible for a firearms related death. It wouldn't surprise me if the owner's lawyer advised removing the specifically targeted firearms sub-forum for liability reasons.winter the only answer i saw was ck saying it was a surprise to him that it was closed and that it was not coming back.....the latter part was surprising to me...at the time i said i think it might be some kinda legal issue
I would be curious to know what sort of legal issue would be present.
I heard the same thing, only from 2 mods. I simply never heard why.
Also, there are still plenty of gun posts. And given the vitriol that is spewed in the political forums, I'm amazed that the gun forum would be a legal issue.
If it is, why not simply say do? Do the people who populate these forums matter so little?
I cant imagine thats the reason.
There are forums that are nothing but guns all over the internet.
I could be wrong but I wouldnt think the income from a message board would cover that.