Breitbart Video: a discussion.

By playing it on Frontline 4 years ago?

*********************************
Part of the plot; there are more to come (cue ominous sounds). The PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES hugged a historian...........that is not in the least bit surprising, nor newsworthy, but Hannity makes big bucks off of HIS blank faced followers.
 
Actually it's not the "Breitbart video". It's history that the liberal media knew about but refused to acknowledge. It's history that the liberal media sat on for political reasons. The video is just part of the story that illustrates the liberal bias of the so-called mainstream media.

Really? Even though it's been on youtube for 4 years?

Imagine that, the bleeped and edited video was on the Tube all this time and Dan Rather never saw it.
 
Actually it's not the "Breitbart video". It's history that the liberal media knew about but refused to acknowledge. It's history that the liberal media sat on for political reasons. The video is just part of the story that illustrates the liberal bias of the so-called mainstream media.

Really? Even though it's been on youtube for 4 years?

Imagine that, the bleeped and edited video was on the Tube all this time and Dan Rather never saw it.

And now right-winger ever read Bell's books on racial justice, one written in 1987 and one in 1992?

I've owned Bell's books for decades. I bought them at Walden books.
 
And Shirley Sherrod said she hated white farmers, remember.

Until the un-brietbartized video was shown.

I wonder what the whole Olgetree video will show.

try employing some critical thinking- if he tried to keep it under wraps and redacted what was put out there, why would he do that?

Who redacted what was put out?

Did you see the entire video of the Olgletree speech? Watch the Olgletree video be Shirley Sherrod all over again.
the Olgletree video be Shirley Sherrod all over again.
*********************************************
Professor Ogletree was not the President's campaign manager, nor are political campaigns required to advertise a speech made by CANDIDATE twenty+ years prior. If so, we would hear Newt & Romney at 5000 Chamber of Commerce meetings over the past DECADES.
 
In 2008 Obama was everywhere protected by a bodyguard of lies.
I thought the press was over affectionate to him at the time. This just goes to show how deeply involved in massaging the results of the election they were.
***********************************************
He was NEWS Baruch; as is ROMNEY. First African American major party nominee, Romney may be first MORMON nominee.

If either of those items are newsworthy, then we have not come as far as we should have. Neither religion nor race should be more newsworthy than the man's positions, and how he came by them
 
I guess what would have been more interesting is a video showing the real story on the rather interesting and world class luck that happen to the Obama family after he was elected Senator.
In less than a year Michelle's income rose by a factor of three. She became a board member of two different companies both paying over $100,000 a year for simply attending meetings where she had absolutely ZERO experience in that industry.
Why would a large hospital appoint her as a board member and VP position when she never worked in the medical industry? At that time she only worked part-time in a law office and worked in marketing for a public office, and a brief stint for Univ of Chicago.
Why would an even larger food company appoint her to a board membership - again - zero experience in the food industry...and zero executive experience in manufacturing whatsoever??
They purchased a $million mansion for a quarter for what it was worth.

They had some mighty lofty salaries and gift employment in Chicago.

and her job at the hospital for which she received that HUGE pay increase a few months after hubby made the senate? It was so important that the job be done? when she left............ they never filled the position.....:lol:No, no corp. cronyism there:rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top