Breaking News: Trump fires Tomahawk Cruise Missles into Syria

Wrong. There was supposed to be a peace treaty in place so they could talk about having a fair election... and Assad violated that treaty because he knew he would lose the election and be removed from power. Even Russia had agreed to those terms.

The Regime Change powers-that-be aren't interested in peace. They're only interested in dominating other nations. Assad was never a threat to the US/West.

Chemical/biological and nuclear weapons are a threat to mankind. To every man, women and child of every race, color, ethnicity and creed.

Then why does the US possess more of em than any other nation on earth? And why hasn't Israel signed the Chemical Weapons Convention Treaty?

You

But regardless, this is just another Wag the Dog False Flag scam. Assad didn't use Chemical Weapons. I'm sure there was a bombing, but i seriously doubt Chemical Weapons were involved. This False Flag is being used as a distraction for Trump, and a justification for the US/West to dominate another country.

You're sure!>?? Consider:
"We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand"
Eric Hoffer

False flag, I doubt it, but the facts in evidence point in that direction.

I'm curious to see if any testing was done to determine the type and possible origin of the agent used. Trump should have at least had confirmation that a chemical agent was even used before proceeding. It'll be interesting to see what if anything comes out in that regard.

Are you serious? The fact that it was a chemical weapon and how it was delivered and by whom was determined within a day of the attack. You really need to find a current news source. CNN and MSNBC isn't working well for you.
 
Obama did nothing you say, but you don't say what Obama could have done to stop non-Americans from supporting ISIS prior to its open rampage and onslaught of terror that made al Qaeda look like they forgot how to be terrorists.

So what could Obama have done short of bombing Saudi Wahhabi mosques?

Just need an answer?

Kept at least 15,000 troops in Iraq and NOT announced to the world when we would be leaving Afghanistan, win, lose or draw. That's just a start.
 
$171.1 million dollars worth of missiles for nothing ... just to be exact n' such.
Bwahahahahaha! Suddenly Siete here is fiscally conservative. The same person who celebrated $500 million to Solyndra - which went out of business shortly after and didn't even attempt to recover some of that money for the tax payer. The same person who praised Barack Obama's $10 trillion in waste, fraud, and abuse.

So $171.1 million dollars in defense (the constitutional responsibility of the federal government) - horrible!

But $500 million to private industry (completely unconstitutional) - good!

In other words - Siete will demonize anything a Republican does and praise anything a Dumbocrat does.

celebrated 500 mil on solyndra?

quote me on that one dipshit ..

your psychobabble gland in in overdrive ... stfu.
 
The Regime Change powers-that-be aren't interested in peace. They're only interested in dominating other nations. Assad was never a threat to the US/West.

Chemical/biological and nuclear weapons are a threat to mankind. To every man, women and child of every race, color, ethnicity and creed.

Then why does the US possess more of em than any other nation on earth? And why hasn't Israel signed the Chemical Weapons Convention Treaty?

You

But regardless, this is just another Wag the Dog False Flag scam. Assad didn't use Chemical Weapons. I'm sure there was a bombing, but i seriously doubt Chemical Weapons were involved. This False Flag is being used as a distraction for Trump, and a justification for the US/West to dominate another country.

You're sure!>?? Consider:
"We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand"
Eric Hoffer

False flag, I doubt it, but the facts in evidence point in that direction.

I'm curious to see if any testing was done to determine the type and possible origin of the agent used. Trump should have at least had confirmation that a chemical agent was even used before proceeding. It'll be interesting to see what if anything comes out in that regard.

Are you serious? The fact that it was a chemical weapon and how it was delivered and by whom was determined within a day of the attack. You really need to find a current news source. CNN and MSNBC isn't working well for you.

Are you serious? CNN is not contradicting what trump are publishing or broadcasting. Who should we believe Infowars, Breitbart or national enquirer?
 
Obama did nothing you say, but you don't say what Obama could have done to stop non-Americans from supporting ISIS prior to its open rampage and onslaught of terror that made al Qaeda look like they forgot how to be terrorists.

So what could Obama have done short of bombing Saudi Wahhabi mosques?

Just need an answer?

Kept at least 15,000 troops in Iraq and NOT announced to the world when we would be leaving Afghanistan, win, lose or draw. That's just a start.

Do you honestly believe leaving 15,000 ( actually 10k) troops in Iraq will stop the birth of ISIS? We have massive armaments and troops in Afghanistan--------- Taliban forces are still strong, Iran are in, al qaeda presence------ ISIS are coming in and now Putin is coming in.
Now tell me how is 10,000 troops will make any difference in Iraq?
 
$171.1 million dollars worth of missiles for nothing ... just to be exact n' such.
Bwahahahahaha! Suddenly Siete here is fiscally conservative. The same person who celebrated $500 million to Solyndra - which went out of business shortly after and didn't even attempt to recover some of that money for the tax payer. The same person who praised Barack Obama's $10 trillion in waste, fraud, and abuse.

So $171.1 million dollars in defense (the constitutional responsibility of the federal government) - horrible!

But $500 million to private industry (completely unconstitutional) - good!

In other words - Siete will demonize anything a Republican does and praise anything a Dumbocrat does.

celebrated 500 mil on solyndra?

quote me on that one dipshit ..

your psychobabble gland in in overdrive ... stfu.
You PRAISED Obama's "stimulus" over and over and over, you nitwit. Don't try to run now because you just exposed yourself as a hypocrite and a partisan hack.
 
$171.1 million dollars worth of missiles for nothing ... just to be exact n' such.
Bwahahahahaha! Suddenly Siete here is fiscally conservative. The same person who celebrated $500 million to Solyndra - which went out of business shortly after and didn't even attempt to recover some of that money for the tax payer. The same person who praised Barack Obama's $10 trillion in waste, fraud, and abuse.

So $171.1 million dollars in defense (the constitutional responsibility of the federal government) - horrible!

But $500 million to private industry (completely unconstitutional) - good!

In other words - Siete will demonize anything a Republican does and praise anything a Dumbocrat does.

celebrated 500 mil on solyndra?

quote me on that one dipshit ..

your psychobabble gland in in overdrive ... stfu.
You PRAISED Obama's "stimulus" over and over and over, you nitwit. Don't try to run now because you just exposed yourself as a hypocrite and a partisan hack.
Translation: You were bullshitting when you falsely claimed Siete praised Obama for dumping money into Solyndra and now you're trying to weasel out of your idiotic comment after getting caught lying again.
 
Markle, post: 17048385
Kept at least 15,000 troops in Iraq and NOT announced to the world when we would be leaving Afghanistan, win, lose or draw. That's just a start.

The only way to keep US troops after the Bush:Maliki SOFA deadline would have been re-invasion and a whole new regime change.

15,000 troops could handle that.

It would have taken half a million.

You gonna pay for that?
 
So, using your logic, NK could dump four or five dozen missiles into SK or Japan and it wouldn't be considered an act of war to you?

Did South Korea or Japan drop chemical or biological outlawed weapons on their own people, North Korea?

Not a viable reason. Lobbing munitions into another country is war, period.

The use of a chemical weapon is illegal. Period. Whatever it takes to stop that is reasonable force.

Glad you agree that "lobbing" passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was an act of war.
Whatever it takes to stop that is reasonable force.
Just not compliant with international law.
 
$171.1 million dollars worth of missiles for nothing ... just to be exact n' such.
Bwahahahahaha! Suddenly Siete here is fiscally conservative. The same person who celebrated $500 million to Solyndra - which went out of business shortly after and didn't even attempt to recover some of that money for the tax payer. The same person who praised Barack Obama's $10 trillion in waste, fraud, and abuse.

So $171.1 million dollars in defense (the constitutional responsibility of the federal government) - horrible!

But $500 million to private industry (completely unconstitutional) - good!

In other words - Siete will demonize anything a Republican does and praise anything a Dumbocrat does.

celebrated 500 mil on solyndra?

quote me on that one dipshit ..

your psychobabble gland in in overdrive ... stfu.
You PRAISED Obama's "stimulus" over and over and over, you nitwit. Don't try to run now because you just exposed yourself as a hypocrite and a partisan hack.

the funds for Solyandra were set up by Bush, not Obama.

The Energy Department's loan guarantee program was created as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, passed by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed by Bush.

In his signing speech, Bush lauded the bill's support for clean technology, though he didn't specifically mention the loan guarantees.

The loan guarantees were designed to "support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks."


now, STFU dumbass.
 
Do you honestly believe leaving 15,000 ( actually 10k) troops in Iraq will stop the birth of ISIS? We have massive armaments and troops in Afghanistan--------- Taliban forces are still strong, Iran are in, al qaeda presence------ ISIS are coming in and now Putin is coming in.
Now tell me how is 10,000 troops will make any difference in Iraq?

Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's military advisors told him that leaving 15,000 troops would have maintained the stability of the country. Maintaining the stability of the country would have kept out ISIS.

As you know, Vladimir Putin would not have moved into the area either. I realize all this is impossible for you to accept. It has been so long since the far left Progressives have experienced WINNING! Relax, take a deep breath, you'll learn to enjoy the experience.

As you know too, you are lying about having "massive armaments and troops in Afghanistan". Our former Leader from Behind announced to the world that he was "ending the war" an Obama for WE'LL SURENDER by such and such a date. Remember, Obama was going to have all our troops out by now.
 
the funds for Solyandra were set up by Bush, not Obama.

The Energy Department's loan guarantee program was created as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, passed by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed by Bush.

In his signing speech, Bush lauded the bill's support for clean technology, though he didn't specifically mention the loan guarantees.

The loan guarantees were designed to "support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks."

now, STFU dumbass.
Ahahahaha! Nice try you lying little bitch. You got caught being a hypocrite and a hyper partisan hack and now you're lying to try to get out of it.
President Obama exaggerated when defending his administration’s approval of a $535 million loan guarantee to Solyndra, a now-defunct solar company.

Obama referred to Solyndra’s loan at an Oct. 6 press conference as “a loan guarantee program that predates me.” That’s not accurate. It’s true that the Energy Policy Act of 2005 created a loan guarantee program for clean-energy companies developing “innovative technologies.” But Solyndra’s loan guarantee came under another program created by the president’s 2009 stimulus for companies developing “commercially available technologies.”
And you celebrated Obama's bullshit "stimulus" back then and you continue to celebrate it to this day. So STFU about the cost of missiles. Nobody cares less about responsible government spending than your ignorant ass. Your fake "outrage" is humiliating and makes you looks like a whiny little tool.

:anj_stfu: :asshole: :fu:

Obama's Solyndra Problem - FactCheck.org
 
the funds for Solyandra were set up by Bush, not Obama. now, STFU dumbass.
Tell me something Siete - how does it feel to be my little bitch on USMB? :suck:
President Obama exaggerated when defending his administration’s approval of a $535 million loan guarantee to Solyndra, a now-defunct solar company.

Obama referred to Solyndra’s loan at an Oct. 6 press conference as “a loan guarantee program that predates me.” That’s not accurate. It’s true that the Energy Policy Act of 2005 created a loan guarantee program for clean-energy companies developing “innovative technologies.” But Solyndra’s loan guarantee came under another program created by the president’s 2009 stimulus for companies developing “commercially available technologies.”

Obama's Solyndra Problem - FactCheck.org
 
Markle, post: 17050652
Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's military advisors told him that leaving 15,000 troops would have maintained the stability of the country. Maintaining the stability of the country would have kept out ISIS.

That's a lie. Nothing you said is true. Not one single military advisor advised Obama to keep one single combat soldier in Iraq without the legal immunity that Iraq refused to grant.

ISIS fighters were operating in Sunni areas while Bush was still president. ISIS turned on their Sunni hosts and went full blown terror caliphate in a natter of days.

Fifteen thousand US troops could not have stopped ISIS from declaring a caliphate unless they were ordered to fight on the Sunni side against the democratically elected Shiite majority government.

Just not doable. Even in hindsight leaving fifteen thousand troops in Iraq would have stopped nothing having to do with ISIS. The problem was the Iraqis were not prepared to fight them.

US troops in the early stages would have been engaged in direct combat with Sunni tribal fighters under orders of the Shiite government.

It would have taken half a million US troops to prevent the swift rise of ISIS in 2014.
 
Markle, post: 17050652
Our former Leader from Behind announced to the world that he was "ending the war" an Obama for WE'LL SURENDER by such and such a date. Remember, Obama was going to have all our troops out by now.

More idiocy. There was no surrender date. When was the surrender date.

We've agreed to a SOFA to support the Afghan government military through 2024.

There were dates set to turn populated areas over the the Afghan government to defend. And they were achieved.

Why do you make this stuff up?
 
Do you honestly believe leaving 15,000 ( actually 10k) troops in Iraq will stop the birth of ISIS? We have massive armaments and troops in Afghanistan--------- Taliban forces are still strong, Iran are in, al qaeda presence------ ISIS are coming in and now Putin is coming in.
Now tell me how is 10,000 troops will make any difference in Iraq?

1. Petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama's military advisors told him that leaving 15,000 troops would have maintained the stability of the country. Maintaining the stability of the country would have kept out ISIS.

2. As you know, Vladimir Putin would not have moved into the area either. I realize all this is impossible for you to accept. It has been so long since the far left Progressives have experienced WINNING! Relax, take a deep breath, you'll learn to enjoy the experience.

3. As you know too, you are lying about having "massive armaments and troops in Afghanistan". Our former Leader from Behind announced to the world that he was "ending the war" an Obama for WE'LL SURENDER by such and such a date. Remember, Obama was going to have all our troops out by now.

1. False. Do you think leaving 10k or 15k troops quelling the birth of ISIS in Iraq? Do you think that will make any difference? If YES ------ -- Tell me how and why?
On top of that----------- Why should we shoulder all the burden of protecting Iraq? Why can't Iraqis defend for their own country? Why should I spent more of my tax $ protecting Iraq? Do you think we have suffered enough with that wasted war? NOW -------- answer all those questions.

2. Putin only moves in last couple of months under the watch of Trump.

Most of the time we are winning. Tell me where we lost? -------- Only that cheetoh clown president-------- keep saying that and his poorly informed followers.
A good example of a petulant president I've ever seen is Trump. He demonstrated that all the time on top of his regular lies.
During his campaign he treated American forces and hardwares like shit comparing us to third world countries------- The other day this clown------ said ----------- our forces is the best and getting stronger--------------- What the fuck-------- He has not done a diddly shit to improve the military.
Tax day April 15 --------- Americans demonstrated all over US because he is hiding something sinister with his tax returns ------- Trump asshole told Americans --------- Election is over -------- Only a fucked up president will said something like that.
3. I'm Lying? Prove it. Obama declared to the world ending the war in Afghanistan? Prove it.

Your post is purely canardism and hard to believe.
Your buddies here adore Infowars and keep posting a real fake news and you love it. Like Patriot that keep posting real fake news -------- and you love it. What that tells me? A typical Trump followers------- poorly informed or just plain ignorant.
 
Last edited:
Nobody is going to mess with us now that President Trump sits in the White House.
Yes clearly Trump being there has cowed the Russians...

Russia Is Testing NATO in the Skies

Last month, a Russian jet flew within five feet of a U.S. reconnaissance plane near the Baltic Sea. According to U.S. officials, the Russian Su-27 “rapidly” approached the U.S. RC-135 plane and acted “provocatively” by performing “unsafe” maneuvers. Russia’s Defense Ministry, for its part, blamed the U.S. plane for “making a provocative turn towards the Su-27” while being escorted away from Russia’s borders. Whatever the truth about this incident, it serves as a reminder of Moscow’s ceaseless belligerence toward NATO.
 
Nobody is going to mess with us now that President Trump sits in the White House.
Yes clearly Trump being there has cowed the Russians...

Russia Is Testing NATO in the Skies

Last month, a Russian jet flew within five feet of a U.S. reconnaissance plane near the Baltic Sea. According to U.S. officials, the Russian Su-27 “rapidly” approached the U.S. RC-135 plane and acted “provocatively” by performing “unsafe” maneuvers. Russia’s Defense Ministry, for its part, blamed the U.S. plane for “making a provocative turn towards the Su-27” while being escorted away from Russia’s borders. Whatever the truth about this incident, it serves as a reminder of Moscow’s ceaseless belligerence toward NATO.
Moscow's ceaseless belligerence? We're the ones amassing troops on their borders, moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top