Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, it doesn't work that way. Each communication is not its own count in the complaint. The two violations are the form and 18 USC 1001. If he didn't disclose three meetings, those are the facts that underlie the violations. .
Possibly on the form, but you are only correct if he is asked three separate questions by an investigator and he fails to answer truthfully on each one. By the time he finally meets with the investigators, Jamie will have him totally prepared and that's not going to happen.No, it doesn't work that way. Each communication is not its own count in the complaint. The two violations are the form and 18 USC 1001. If he didn't disclose three meetings, those are the facts that underlie the violations. .
Nope, each undisclosed meeting is a violation of 18 USC 1001. It's like evading the police by running 12 red lights, and 6 stop signs. You're going to be charged with each incident. And you get charged for omitting each meeting.
Well, sparky, wait until all the investigations are completed and publicized. Then, we'll know...
[
So after nearly a year of investigations, with all the leaks in Washington, there is NOTHING.
Well, sparky, wait until all the investigations are completed and publicized. Then, we'll know...
So after nearly a year of investigations, with all the leaks in Washington, there is NOTHING.
GOT IT!
Trump, Kushner – the lot of them: inexperienced, incompetent, arrogant; victims of their own stupidity and ignorance.Russian Ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin.
Kushner Reportedly Asked For Secret Communications Channel With Kremlin - WAPO
That doesn't sound good. Breaking on CNN and MSNBC. Reportedly, even Kislyak was taken aback by such a request.
Cite them!If there is no crime, why is the Comrade obstructing justice, IN MULTIPLE CASES!
Cite them!If there is no crime, why is the Comrade obstructing justice, IN MULTIPLE CASES!
Asking the Director of the FBI to end of investigation against Flynn
Firing the Director after asking for loyalty and being rebuffs
Asking at least two of his intelligence heads to deny Russian collusion and was rebuffed
Calling Flynn and telling him to "stay strong."
And I am sure that when Comey testifies that we will see other cases where the Comrade knowingly and willfully attempted to obstruct justice. As Mueller gets closer to the truth, he will commit more violations of the law.
Trump, Kushner – the lot of them: inexperienced, incompetent, arrogant; victims of their own stupidity and ignorance.Russian Ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin.
Kushner Reportedly Asked For Secret Communications Channel With Kremlin - WAPO
That doesn't sound good. Breaking on CNN and MSNBC. Reportedly, even Kislyak was taken aback by such a request.
This is why those with no experience and understanding of the law, sound governance, and foreign policy have no business in the WH – Trump in particular.
...Trump, Kushner – the lot of them: inexperienced, incompetent, arrogant; victims of their own stupidity and ignorance.Russian Ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin.
Kushner Reportedly Asked For Secret Communications Channel With Kremlin - WAPO
That doesn't sound good. Breaking on CNN and MSNBC. Reportedly, even Kislyak was taken aback by such a request.
This is why those with no experience and understanding of the law, sound governance, and foreign policy have no business in the WH – Trump in particular.
I couldn't agree more. Trump's anarchist base is loving it - but normal people are embarrassed...and nervous.
No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”Failed to state on the form I posted above that he had meetings with the Russians. That's two violations as I described above.
Maybe three violations. Kushner communicated or met with the Russians in April, November and December.
What violation? What law was broken? Why hasn't any of your far left wing "news" sources revealed the allegations?
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
Entirely different subjects Secretary of State violated laws. Comey said so.[
So after nearly a year of investigations, with all the leaks in Washington, there is NOTHING.
How many Benghazi investigations where there?
How many years did whitewater drag on for?
Suddenly why the hurry?
The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”Failed to state on the form I posted above that he had meetings with the Russians. That's two violations as I described above.
Maybe three violations. Kushner communicated or met with the Russians in April, November and December.
What violation? What law was broken? Why hasn't any of your far left wing "news" sources revealed the allegations?
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
So what, if he violated something, why hasn't he been arrested?The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”Failed to state on the form I posted above that he had meetings with the Russians. That's two violations as I described above.
Maybe three violations. Kushner communicated or met with the Russians in April, November and December.
What violation? What law was broken? Why hasn't any of your far left wing "news" sources revealed the allegations?
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
If you have read my posts in this thread, I have said that it appears to be a technical violation and one that is fixable. Your incessant "where's the crime" posts simply led me to point out the facts and the law. That's all. He'll skate on the legal issue for sure, as far as I am concerned. It is the political issue (obviously) that will be more difficult than the legal one.So what, if he violated something, why hasn't he been arrested?The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. be If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”Maybe three violations. Kushner communicated or met with the Russians in April, November and December.
What violation? What law was broken? Why hasn't any of your far left wing "news" sources revealed the allegations?
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
So again, there is absolutely nothing to warrant coverage of any wrong doings. Period let's get people working rather than chasing rabbits down holesIf you have read my posts in this thread, I have said that it appears to be a technical violation and one that is fixable. Your incessant "where's the crime" posts simply led me to point out the facts and the law. That's all. He'll skate on the legal issue for sure, as far as I am concerned. It is the political issue (obviously) that will be more difficult than the legal one.So what, if he violated something, why hasn't he been arrested?The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. be If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”What violation? What law was broken? Why hasn't any of your far left wing "news" sources revealed the allegations?
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
Different question. You were in many posts raising the issue of whether there was a technical crime. Now you are raising the issue of how material the crime is. I happen to agree with the issue you're raising now. Unless there is some kind of a pattern or he lies to investigators (won't happen) there is no prosecution coming. Still political fallout, but that's just noise.So again, there is absolutely nothing to warrant coverage of any wrong doings. Period let's get people working rather than chasing rabbits down holesIf you have read my posts in this thread, I have said that it appears to be a technical violation and one that is fixable. Your incessant "where's the crime" posts simply led me to point out the facts and the law. That's all. He'll skate on the legal issue for sure, as far as I am concerned. It is the political issue (obviously) that will be more difficult than the legal one.So what, if he violated something, why hasn't he been arrested?The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutorYou remind me of an old adage that lawyers always repeat to each other: “If the facts are against you, argue the law. be If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”
I've put the facts and the law out there for you and you don't seem to understand it. Can't help you from there sorry.
Nope not at all. There is no crime. Nadia. It's you all playing whack-a-mole that I'm responding toDifferent question. You were in many posts raising the issue of whether there was a technical crime. Now you are raising the issue of how material the crime is. I happen to agree with the issue you're raising now. Unless there is some kind of a pattern or he lies to investigators (won't happen) there is no prosecution coming. Still political fallout, but that's just noise.So again, there is absolutely nothing to warrant coverage of any wrong doings. Period let's get people working rather than chasing rabbits down holesIf you have read my posts in this thread, I have said that it appears to be a technical violation and one that is fixable. Your incessant "where's the crime" posts simply led me to point out the facts and the law. That's all. He'll skate on the legal issue for sure, as far as I am concerned. It is the political issue (obviously) that will be more difficult than the legal one.So what, if he violated something, why hasn't he been arrested?The form. He signed it. It failed to disclose the meetings. That is documentary evidence. But clearly you want to believe your own narrative, so whatever.No facts in evidence mr prosecutor
The real thing we should be concentrating on is the fact that the Russians are bad guys. Forget the collusion, and squash any attempts the Russians make to destabilize our Republic.
