Breaking:AG Jeff Sessions Blocks FBI Informant From Testifying Against Hillary In Uranium-One Deal

Sessions may be a lot of things, bot a moron pursuing something thats been debunked by EVERY credible source on the planet more times than Trump has lied, he's not.


poor Steve McIdiot, forever lost in lala land.
 
Sessions may be a lot of things, bot a moron pursuing something thats been debunked by EVERY credible source on the planet more times than Trump has lied, he's not.


poor Steve McIdiot, forever lost in lala land.
I notice how almost every one of your Trump hating posts attacks the messenger.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Sessions may be a lot of things, bot a moron pursuing something thats been debunked by EVERY credible source on the planet more times than Trump has lied, he's not.


poor Steve McIdiot, forever lost in lala land.
The story hasn't been debunked, idiot. That's why the hearing is going on.
 
I wish someone would explain how this story has been "debunked".

It stinks of corruption.

Hillary Clinton calling it a "nothingburger" is not quite enough for me.
 
The Dirty Democrats have investigated themselves and "debunked" their own corruption and lies LMAO
 
Sessions might be withholding the evidence from Congress because the Dirty Democrats might spoil the case against Hillary
 
This proves Sessions is protecting the swamp. This is outright obstruction of justice. Trump should order him to lift the gag order and if he refuses, fire him.


Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: AG Sessions Refuses to Lift Gag On Key Witness to Clinton-Uranium Scandal (VIDEO)

FBI informant blocked from telling Congress about Russia nuclear corruption case, lawyer says
Possibly. Or, it could be Sessions doing his job, in protecting an ongoing FBI case. Who are we to say it's one or the other? That said, Sessions could clear this up by simply releasing a statement as to why he is not lifting the NDA. Then again, that alone could jeopardise any potential ongoing FBI case. Point is, let's not jump to conclusions without having, and considering, all the facts, and possibilities.

Then again, that wouldn't really lend itself to the agenda of the Trump haters, otr the Trump lovers, would it?
 
This proves Sessions is protecting the swamp. This is outright obstruction of justice. Trump should order him to lift the gag order and if he refuses, fire him.


Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: AG Sessions Refuses to Lift Gag On Key Witness to Clinton-Uranium Scandal (VIDEO)

FBI informant blocked from telling Congress about Russia nuclear corruption case, lawyer says

Why is he protecting these douche bags? Perhaps it's because he wants to live past the next election.
 
This proves Sessions is protecting the swamp. This is outright obstruction of justice. Trump should order him to lift the gag order and if he refuses, fire him.


Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: AG Sessions Refuses to Lift Gag On Key Witness to Clinton-Uranium Scandal (VIDEO)

FBI informant blocked from telling Congress about Russia nuclear corruption case, lawyer says
Possibly. Or, it could be Sessions doing his job, in protecting an ongoing FBI case. Who are we to say it's one or the other? That said, Sessions could clear this up by simply releasing a statement as to why he is not lifting the NDA. Then again, that alone could jeopardise any potential ongoing FBI case. Point is, let's not jump to conclusions without having, and considering, all the facts, and possibilities.

Then again, that wouldn't really lend itself to the agenda of the Trump haters, otr the Trump lovers, would it?
He's jeaporizing it by not allowing that guy to testify. The point of an investigation is to bring the evidence to light, not hide it.
 
This proves Sessions is protecting the swamp. This is outright obstruction of justice. Trump should order him to lift the gag order and if he refuses, fire him.


Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer: AG Sessions Refuses to Lift Gag On Key Witness to Clinton-Uranium Scandal (VIDEO)

FBI informant blocked from telling Congress about Russia nuclear corruption case, lawyer says
Possibly. Or, it could be Sessions doing his job, in protecting an ongoing FBI case. Who are we to say it's one or the other? That said, Sessions could clear this up by simply releasing a statement as to why he is not lifting the NDA. Then again, that alone could jeopardise any potential ongoing FBI case. Point is, let's not jump to conclusions without having, and considering, all the facts, and possibilities.

Then again, that wouldn't really lend itself to the agenda of the Trump haters, otr the Trump lovers, would it?
He's jeaporizing it by not allowing that guy to testify. The point of an investigation is to bring the evidence to light, not hide it.
Quite true, and as such, would it not be prudent to protect the investigation until it's conclusion, so as to garner as much evidence as possible? To do that, every LEO knows there are certain things that MUST remain out of the public knowledge. Why is the same not true here? Or is it that you are simply impatient?
 
I wish someone would explain how this story has been "debunked".

It stinks of corruption.

Hillary Clinton calling it a "nothingburger" is not quite enough for me.

how could she hand over more uranium that we had .. use idiot RW math and make something that was impossible to do, possible to do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top