Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As far as I am concerned this thread was proven on page one. Page six and not one intelligent argument. I don't have the time or desirer to play these childish games.
Like it or not Boston bombing was staged just like some other events that the mainstream media and government suckers some people into buy the time you wake the fuck up it will be to late.
here you go clear picsI watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
You are like that guy in the pics you don't have a leg to stand on, the actors could tell you them selves and you would still be in denial.That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
Bush made it "dustify".exactly.well said.
let me guess,YOU believe in magic bullets that stop in mid air and change directions, that oswald shot JFK as well right,that there was no conspiracy,just one shooter,oswald?
Nope there is ample evidence that the Warren report is less than accurate. That Oswald was part of a conspiracy is not in doubt. However, the Boston bombing was two assholes. The 9-11 attacks were 19 assholes working for a larger conspiracy. There has been no compelling evidence presented to date that says otherwise. The claims that the buildings were brought down by explosives is simply ludicrous. I'm a pilot so I actually understand the physics of flight and how truly fragile an aircraft is....even a huge passenger jet.
I also got to play with explosives when I was younger so understand how they work too, so the smoke and mirrors that the truthers present are simply hilarious. You guys truly have no idea what you're talking about.
But, like I said, your stuff is funny to read!
you lost your credibility right there with your deluded fantasys the warren commission is accurate and the fact you indeed believe in magic bullets.
might try and read something else that has an opposing view that exposes the lies of the warren report.
there have been at least a dozen or so books i can refer you to that have done just that and have exposed it with one lie after another and one omission after another the warrne commission made.
obviously you are too scared to look at something that has an opposing view different than your own fantasys and fairy tales though and believe in every fairy tale the government tells you and you only see what you WANT to see.
they never proved oswald did it however it HAS been proved there were indeed multiple shooters as well that the zapruder film was altered,many photographic experts around the world have concluded the zapruder film is a hoax as well as the autopsy photos.
But what EXPERTS say and what witnesses who where there said which proves you are clueless in your ramblings of course means NOTHING to you though since as we both know you are afraid of the truth and only see what you want to see.
have no more time to waste on someone who believes in magic bullets.
evidence destroyed at the scene of the crime,witness intimidation and harrassment,people dying who gave versions different than the government mysterious dying.
roger craig a police officer who insisted the first rifle they found was a mauser and not a mannlicher carcano,when he did not recent his testimony like two other police officers did,one who owned a gunshop,he had many death threats on his life and they finally killed him eventually.
withess testimonys said the man who shot tippet did not look like oswald
and jessie curry the dallas police chief,wrote a book in 1980 saying that he was pressured by higher ups in dallas to initially say oswald did it after initially saying there was no evidence he did it and that the evidence indicated a second shooter. its all here in these 2 videos you wont watch of course.
gerald ford who was on the warren commission,got rewarded POTUS for his role in the coverup and so did arlen spector for his role as well.
deal with it,you have been taken to school by me,you are just fooling yourself denying this reality.
Ummmm, where exactly did I say I "believe" in the magic bullet theory? I state very clearly that Oswald was not acting alone. You know, if you weren't so blind you would almost be funny.
How is it you can completely mis-state what I said? Is English a second language for you? Do you only speak truther so can only understand fellow demented people? Do you all have your own secret language?
I am truly interested.
What did you post here? More of your secret lingo?
they only see what they want to see so he wont watch it.same as how they wont watch videos of proof that explosives brought the twin towers down.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
they only see what they want to see so he wont watch it.same as how they wont watch videos of proof that explosives brought the twin towers down.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I say bsTalk to my son. He put tourniquets on the little girl who lost both of her legs, stabilized her mom and pronounced her brother.
Can any one explain this.
yeah you watched about 10 seconds of it and then turned it off.they only see what they want to see so he wont watch it.same as how they wont watch videos of proof that explosives brought the twin towers down.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
Already DID watch it. It is wrong. Simple as that.
you mean the conspiracy theorists who believe in THIS lunatic wacky conspiracy theory?That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
yeah you watched about 10 seconds of it and then turned it off.they only see what they want to see so he wont watch it.same as how they wont watch videos of proof that explosives brought the twin towers down.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
Already DID watch it. It is wrong. Simple as that.
till you stop ignoring facts that 9/11 was an inside job that there is no evidence 19 muslins pulled it off,then you cant expect me to bother reading your ramblings anymore.you wont read that ling of mine on 9/11 nor will you watch that video misterbeal posted so till you stop living in denial on 9/11,im done with you.
they are so much in denial just like you said,the actors could tell them themselves and they would STILL be in denial same as how they wont look at anything that exposes 9/11 as an inside jobThat one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?You are like that guy in the pics you don't have a leg to stand on, the actors could tell you them selves and you would still be in denial.That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
they are so much in denial just like you said,the actors could tell them themselves and they would STILL be in denial same as how they wont look at anything that exposes 9/11 as an inside jobThat one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?You are like that guy in the pics you don't have a leg to stand on, the actors could tell you them selves and you would still be in denial.That one is worse than the first. You don't even have to hit play on the video to see the pool of blood in the lower left corner. If what remained of that man's femoral artery was lying on the ground underneath of him or retracted back up in the leg there wouldn't be arterial spray on the other people's faces. What's worse is the asshole in this video is laughing at bomb blast victims and dead children in Connecticut. Real classy.Watch the vid it has clear pics then no more of your idiotic replies.I watched your video. It's footage with an annoying voice over using a shitty mic. The guy picks out three people on the edge of a group of seriously wounded victims and proclaims they are faking it because they don't have any visible injuries. He completely ignores the blood on the sidewalk multiple times. The blood stained hands of those around the injured that are trying to staunch the bleeding. If it isn't visible from the narrator's conveniently chosen camera angle it does not exist."They don't start running until the smoke rolls in." Smoke typically means fire. Of course they run away from the smoke. People standing around a campfire move away from it. Shock, PTSD, or whatever you want to call it and adrenaline can make people unaware of significant injuries. The family members in question probably were not aware of their injuries until they reached an aid station or took a minute to think about what had just happened. The narrator is oblivious to the clear limp of the daughter while he is saying she doesn't have a dislocated ankle. Ever stop to think about the number of people involved to pull this off? It would have to be in the hundreds, more likely, thousands. Do you honestly believe that many people can keep a secret of this magnitude? So after watching that utterly ridiculous video (12 minutes I can never get back) that amounted to a profanity laced rant about a family's fake injuries using grainy still zooms from chosen angles; I would still believe Ernie's claim over yours. Even without his proof. That's just how crazy your "evidence" really is.
I wonder if these conspiracy theorists don't suffer from sort of psychological problem when they refuse to believe what is right in front of them. It's almost like the magical thinking seen in children. Associative thinking perhaps since there is a need to connect what they think happened to what actually happened?
exactly.well said.
let me guess,YOU believe in magic bullets that stop in mid air and change directions, that oswald shot JFK as well right,that there was no conspiracy,just one shooter,oswald?
Nope there is ample evidence that the Warren report is less than accurate. That Oswald was part of a conspiracy is not in doubt. However, the Boston bombing was two assholes. The 9-11 attacks were 19 assholes working for a larger conspiracy. There has been no compelling evidence presented to date that says otherwise. The claims that the buildings were brought down by explosives is simply ludicrous. I'm a pilot so I actually understand the physics of flight and how truly fragile an aircraft is....even a huge passenger jet.
I also got to play with explosives when I was younger so understand how they work too, so the smoke and mirrors that the truthers present are simply hilarious. You guys truly have no idea what you're talking about.
But, like I said, your stuff is funny to read!
you lost your credibility right there with your deluded fantasys the warren commission is accurate and the fact you indeed believe in magic bullets.
might try and read something else that has an opposing view that exposes the lies of the warren report.
there have been at least a dozen or so books i can refer you to that have done just that and have exposed it with one lie after another and one omission after another the warrne commission made.
obviously you are too scared to look at something that has an opposing view different than your own fantasys and fairy tales though and believe in every fairy tale the government tells you and you only see what you WANT to see.
they never proved oswald did it however it HAS been proved there were indeed multiple shooters as well that the zapruder film was altered,many photographic experts around the world have concluded the zapruder film is a hoax as well as the autopsy photos.
But what EXPERTS say and what witnesses who where there said which proves you are clueless in your ramblings of course means NOTHING to you though since as we both know you are afraid of the truth and only see what you want to see.
have no more time to waste on someone who believes in magic bullets.
evidence destroyed at the scene of the crime,witness intimidation and harrassment,people dying who gave versions different than the government mysterious dying.
roger craig a police officer who insisted the first rifle they found was a mauser and not a mannlicher carcano,when he did not recent his testimony like two other police officers did,one who owned a gunshop,he had many death threats on his life and they finally killed him eventually.
withess testimonys said the man who shot tippet did not look like oswald
and jessie curry the dallas police chief,wrote a book in 1980 saying that he was pressured by higher ups in dallas to initially say oswald did it after initially saying there was no evidence he did it and that the evidence indicated a second shooter. its all here in these 2 videos you wont watch of course.
gerald ford who was on the warren commission,got rewarded POTUS for his role in the coverup and so did arlen spector for his role as well.
deal with it,you have been taken to school by me,you are just fooling yourself denying this reality.
Ummmm, where exactly did I say I "believe" in the magic bullet theory? I state very clearly that Oswald was not acting alone. You know, if you weren't so blind you would almost be funny.
How is it you can completely mis-state what I said? Is English a second language for you? Do you only speak truther so can only understand fellow demented people? Do you all have your own secret language?
I am truly interested.
Well since you are so afraid of the truth that 9/11 was an inside job i only read a couple words of yours in that sentence assuming you were in denial about that event as well,my mistake.
you are no doubt one of those people who can accept the fact the warren commission is fiction but cant deal with facts the CIA and the mossad was behind 9/11 as they were the boston bombing which is no surprise.
I come across your kind all the time.People who can accept it that the warren commission was a con job and there was a conspiracy but WONT look at the evidence on 9/11 that it was a con job as well and the governmnet lied about the boston bombing as well because unlike JFK,these two events are so much more recent than the JFK assassination and they hit much closer to home to you so you wont look at the evidence on either of these events.
having the government murder 3000 of its own citizens is a lot more scarier of a fact to face than them murdering just one politician thats why so many people like you can deal with JFK but not 9/11 or the boston bombing.
misterbeale took you to school on how the governments explanation on 9/11 is pure BS with that video just as I am in this link below..
Idaho Observer: The looniest of all 9/11 conspiracy theories
anybody who watches that short video misterbeale posted and bothers to read this link below and STILL thinks 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks,needs to get off the crack they been smoking.
as i said,i find your warped logic amusing as hell that even though our government has a history of lying to the people such as the JFK assassination,and they failed to prove bin laden was behind it or those 19 muslims did it,you believe THEM over these credible experts
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
comedy gold.
What exactly am I afraid of again? I rely on evidence to arrive at a conclusion. Your carrying on like a 10 year old high on sugar doesn't help you. There has been no credible evidence presented that shows the buildings were brought down by explosives. None.
Nope there is ample evidence that the Warren report is less than accurate. That Oswald was part of a conspiracy is not in doubt. However, the Boston bombing was two assholes. The 9-11 attacks were 19 assholes working for a larger conspiracy. There has been no compelling evidence presented to date that says otherwise. The claims that the buildings were brought down by explosives is simply ludicrous. I'm a pilot so I actually understand the physics of flight and how truly fragile an aircraft is....even a huge passenger jet.
I also got to play with explosives when I was younger so understand how they work too, so the smoke and mirrors that the truthers present are simply hilarious. You guys truly have no idea what you're talking about.
But, like I said, your stuff is funny to read!
you lost your credibility right there with your deluded fantasys the warren commission is accurate and the fact you indeed believe in magic bullets.
might try and read something else that has an opposing view that exposes the lies of the warren report.
there have been at least a dozen or so books i can refer you to that have done just that and have exposed it with one lie after another and one omission after another the warrne commission made.
obviously you are too scared to look at something that has an opposing view different than your own fantasys and fairy tales though and believe in every fairy tale the government tells you and you only see what you WANT to see.
they never proved oswald did it however it HAS been proved there were indeed multiple shooters as well that the zapruder film was altered,many photographic experts around the world have concluded the zapruder film is a hoax as well as the autopsy photos.
But what EXPERTS say and what witnesses who where there said which proves you are clueless in your ramblings of course means NOTHING to you though since as we both know you are afraid of the truth and only see what you want to see.
have no more time to waste on someone who believes in magic bullets.
evidence destroyed at the scene of the crime,witness intimidation and harrassment,people dying who gave versions different than the government mysterious dying.
roger craig a police officer who insisted the first rifle they found was a mauser and not a mannlicher carcano,when he did not recent his testimony like two other police officers did,one who owned a gunshop,he had many death threats on his life and they finally killed him eventually.
withess testimonys said the man who shot tippet did not look like oswald
and jessie curry the dallas police chief,wrote a book in 1980 saying that he was pressured by higher ups in dallas to initially say oswald did it after initially saying there was no evidence he did it and that the evidence indicated a second shooter. its all here in these 2 videos you wont watch of course.
gerald ford who was on the warren commission,got rewarded POTUS for his role in the coverup and so did arlen spector for his role as well.
deal with it,you have been taken to school by me,you are just fooling yourself denying this reality.
Ummmm, where exactly did I say I "believe" in the magic bullet theory? I state very clearly that Oswald was not acting alone. You know, if you weren't so blind you would almost be funny.
How is it you can completely mis-state what I said? Is English a second language for you? Do you only speak truther so can only understand fellow demented people? Do you all have your own secret language?
I am truly interested.
Well since you are so afraid of the truth that 9/11 was an inside job i only read a couple words of yours in that sentence assuming you were in denial about that event as well,my mistake.
you are no doubt one of those people who can accept the fact the warren commission is fiction but cant deal with facts the CIA and the mossad was behind 9/11 as they were the boston bombing which is no surprise.
I come across your kind all the time.People who can accept it that the warren commission was a con job and there was a conspiracy but WONT look at the evidence on 9/11 that it was a con job as well and the governmnet lied about the boston bombing as well because unlike JFK,these two events are so much more recent than the JFK assassination and they hit much closer to home to you so you wont look at the evidence on either of these events.
having the government murder 3000 of its own citizens is a lot more scarier of a fact to face than them murdering just one politician thats why so many people like you can deal with JFK but not 9/11 or the boston bombing.
misterbeale took you to school on how the governments explanation on 9/11 is pure BS with that video just as I am in this link below..
Idaho Observer: The looniest of all 9/11 conspiracy theories
anybody who watches that short video misterbeale posted and bothers to read this link below and STILL thinks 19 muslins were behind the 9/11 attacks,needs to get off the crack they been smoking.
as i said,i find your warped logic amusing as hell that even though our government has a history of lying to the people such as the JFK assassination,and they failed to prove bin laden was behind it or those 19 muslims did it,you believe THEM over these credible experts
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
comedy gold.
What exactly am I afraid of again? I rely on evidence to arrive at a conclusion. Your carrying on like a 10 year old high on sugar doesn't help you. There has been no credible evidence presented that shows the buildings were brought down by explosives. None.
afraid to read that link i posted obviously of those credible experts who dont accept the governments version of events.
wrong as always, there is no evidence the fires brought them down nor is there any evidence 19 muslims were behind the attacks,the alleged highjackers they said did it,many of the so called people they said did it,wound up alive.
there were many credible witnesses there who heard explosions.
BLD 7 is the crux of the 9/11 coverup you and nobody else has ever been able to debunk.
the explosives were heard by many credible witnesses. many being experienced firefighters experienced in explosives.architects and engineers dont except the official explanation of the collapse of the towers,demoltion experts as well.one who came out and said bld 7 was a controlled demolition met an untimely death after that.
same as in the JFK assassination when people who gave versions different than the governments version met untimely deaths,same happened with 9/11 witnesses who talked about hearing explosions.
expert pilots dont accept the 9/11 coverup commissions explanation of the airliners making those incredible turns in the air for the pentagon because THEY could not have done it, sorry but all those credible people in that link i posted that you refused to look at, are far more credible than you are.deal with it.
you're afraid to look at that link of all those credible people who dont accept the governments version of events as well as ignoring what witnesses said who where there and wound up dying for giving versions that did not fit the governments explanation.
well then you have not looked at the evidence in 9/11 because the evidence proves beyond a doubt explosives brought them down.
i would say refusing to read links like you do and refusing to listen to what architects,enginners,and demolition experts say is carrying on like a 10 year old high on sugar.
'your too easy to debunk so i am bored of you.Still waiting. C'mon 9/11, you're such a confident little twerp. I would have expected you to be able to come up with at least one fact. But no, you're off hiding in the thread laughing at day old posts. Pretty fucking weak dude. Just sayin...
