Blizzard in USA – Extreme Cold in Asia

[Billy_Bob]

The libs got their heads in defense position and moonglow is leading the way...

 

[waltky]

Uncle Ferd says, "Yea...

... it's a new ice age...

... we all gonna freeze to death...

... get used to it."

 

[skookerasbil]

Love the threads where you see the heads exploding of the AGW k00ks!!

 

[9aces]

Love the threads where you see the heads exploding of the AGW k00ks!!

I just like pointing out they'll have to take over the world and kill off a fair bit of the population to achieve their goal of control.

Not that it will have any appreciable affect on the climate.

 

[Crick]

The Paris agreement tells us quite clearly that the governments of the world are aware of the reality and of the threat of AGW and are willing to do something about it. It will likely turn out to be not enough, but if you consider that a matter of illegitimate control, I suggest you abandon your puerile fantasies and attend your local voting booth. Where you will lose.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The Paris agreement tells us quite clearly that the governments of the world are aware of the reality and of the threat of AGW and are willing to do something about it. It will likely turn out to be not enough, but if you consider that a matter of illegitimate control, I suggest you abandon your puerile fantasies and attend your local voting booth. Where you will lose.

The Paris agreement was a dog and pony show that will have no effect on the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere or temperature.. The only thing Paris has done is show who will be the receiver of stolen wealth and those who will be killed by stealing it. Commies and Socialists do that, Neither one really cares about the environment. They thrive on control of people and wealth.

 

[mamooth]

To summarize the physics behind it ...

The northern polar jet stream is driven by temperature differences between the arctic and mid-latitudes.

The arctic is warming faster than the mid-latitudes, so there's less of a difference, so the northern polar jet is weakening.

When the jet stream weakens, it meanders more, like a slow river.

Those big meandering loops mean that big masses of warm air can move further north, and big masses of cold air can move further south. Which is exactly what we see.

So, climate science was proven 100% correct again, and the crybaby deniers are having their usual meltdowns over it. Same old same old.

 

[9aces]

No the ice melt is not normal. Its obvious you are not reading the articles posted.

sure it is, it melts in the summer months and refreezes in the winter months. you should really learn about the way the earth moves and it's two solstice and patterns around those two unique points twice a year. Damn s0n, learn yourself some earth knowledge would ya?

You are half right. The problem is that its melting more in the summer and refreezing less in the winters. I know you are not that bright but even you should have picked up on that one right? Now are you still confused with what melting ice does to weather?

again, you haven't proven, one that ice melt in the Arctic is any more than it was in the 70s, your first failure, two, the amount of refreeze is as much as back in the 70s failure two. And failure three is you thinking that normal weather is due to ice melt in the Arctic which is the same today as it was almost forty years ago.

What you represent are lies and many of them. Every time someone like me proves you wrong, enrages you and you act silly on message boards. You're not silly, you're sad, you have evidence you have no idea what it represents and post nonsense after nonsense. yep I'm proud, I know who I am.

This is why I said you must be a conservative. Only dummies dont understand the what global warming implies.

Well this should be good. Do...please tell us what you think global warming implies?

Still waiting..... What's the matter warmers. Having difficulty expressing what it is you believe "climate change" is going to do?

 

[mamooth]

Tell this should be good. Do...please tell us what you think global warming implies?

Global warming means it will get warmer.

Do you need that explained in smaller words? If so, I'm afraid I can't help you. Apparently, it's not possible to dumb it down to a level that you could understand.

By the way, your genocide fantasies make you look like some kind of sociopathic perv wuss. In case nobody has broken that to you, I just did.

 

[9aces]

Tell this should be good. Do...please tell us what you think global warming implies?

Global warming means it will get warmer.

Do you need that explained in smaller words? If so, I'm afraid I can't help you. Apparently, it's not possible to dumb it down to a level that you could understand.

By the way, your genocide fantasies make you look like some kind of sociopathic perv wuss. In case nobody has broken that to you, I just did.

So you're saying you're too stupid to understand the question. If getting warmer is so bad....why?

Genocide fantasies? I have no idea what you're talking about. Are you just attempting to deflect since you apparently won't answer the question?

 

[mamooth]

So you're saying you're too stupid to understand the question.

Don't get upset just because I pointed out you asked a stupid question. Instead, try asking less stupid questions. The next question is a good start.

If getting warmer is so bad....why?

Because human civilization was built around the current climate, and suddenly changing means teentsy little problems such as fertile areas for agriculture being no longer fertile, leading to mass starvation. Or areas where a billion people live being flooded, resulting in those billion people needing to move somewhere else.

Genocide fantasies? I have no idea what you're talking about. Are you just attempting to deflect since you apparently won't answer the question?

So you're no longer fantasizing about someone taking over the world and kill off most the population? Good, that's progress.

 

[jc456]

To summarize the physics behind it ...

The northern polar jet stream is driven by temperature differences between the arctic and mid-latitudes.

The arctic is warming faster than the mid-latitudes, so there's less of a difference, so the northern polar jet is weakening.

When the jet stream weakens, it meanders more, like a slow river.

Those big meandering loops mean that big masses of warm air can move further north, and big masses of cold air can move further south. Which is exactly what we see.

So, climate science was proven 100% correct again, and the crybaby deniers are having their usual meltdowns over it. Same old same old.

yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if it's weaker? dude/ dudette, that makes absolutely no sense. The polar Vortex is moved based on temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic which cause the convection of the jet stream to change and it forces it south. It's in the libturd's favorite resource Wikipedia. Go read yourself up there them good ole facts on what causes the Vortex to move.

And let me know when you have all those temperature records from the north pole. Santa sending them to ya?

 

[jc456]

The Paris agreement tells us quite clearly that the governments of the world are aware of the reality and of the threat of AGW and are willing to do something about it. It will likely turn out to be not enough, but if you consider that a matter of illegitimate control, I suggest you abandon your puerile fantasies and attend your local voting booth. Where you will lose.

The Paris agreement tells us quite clearly that the governments of the world are aware of the reality and of the threat of AGW and are willing to do something about it.

just curious were you there at the convention? You heard all of the speakers?

More useless fiction from crickster.

 

[mamooth]

yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if it's weaker?

You're the only kook saying the polar vortex is weaker, so you'll have to explain it to everyone. The non-morons understand how the polar vortex and polar jet stream are two completely different things.

dude/ dudette, that makes absolutely no sense.

Of course it makes no sense, being it came from you.

The polar Vortex is moved based on temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic which cause the convection of the jet stream to change and it forces it south. It's in the libturd's favorite resource Wikipedia. Go read yourself up there them good ole facts on what causes the Vortex to move.

As everyone knows you're just making up stupid shit again, I don't need to bother.

And let me know when you have all those temperature records from the north pole. Santa sending them to ya?

I've given them to you before, so you know exactly where to find them.

This warm winter we're having

So why do lie like that, when I can just toss out a link so easily to prove you lied? Do you get withdrawl shakes if you don't lie 12 times before breakfast?

So, let's look at the ice buoys up north.

North Pole 90N

Here's a buoy near the pole.

http://iabp.apl.washington.edu/raw_plots.php?bid=300234062428050

A few days ago, temps shot almost up to freezing, when the normal for this time is around -25C. That is, toasty at the pole while it was cool in southeast asia.

 

[jc456]

yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if it's weaker?

You're the only kook saying the polar vortex is weaker, so you'll have to explain it to everyone. The non-morons understand how the polar vortex and polar jet stream are two completely different things.

dude/ dudette, that makes absolutely no sense.

Of course it makes no sense, being it came from you.

The polar Vortex is moved based on temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic which cause the convection of the jet stream to change and it forces it south. It's in the libturd's favorite resource Wikipedia. Go read yourself up there them good ole facts on what causes the Vortex to move.

As everyone knows you're just making up stupid shit again, I don't need to bother.

And let me know when you have all those temperature records from the north pole. Santa sending them to ya?

I've given them to you before, so you know exactly where to find them.

This warm winter we're having

So why do lie like that, when I can just toss out a link so easily to prove you lied? Do you get withdrawl shakes if you don't lie 12 times before breakfast?

So, let's look at the ice buoys up north.

North Pole 90N

Here's a buoy near the pole. A few days ago, temps shot almost up to freezing, when the normal for this time is around -25C. That is, toasty at the pole while it was cool in southeast asia.

You're the only kook saying the polar vortex is weaker, so you'll have to explain it to everyone. The non-morons understand how the polar vortex and polar jet stream are two completely different things.
I did? where? post that up here in quotes and let me read what it is makes you write this lie?

As everyone knows you're just making up stupid shit again, I don't need to bother.
figures.

 

[mamooth]

Well, I certainly didn't say the polar vortex was weaker, and someone said it, so that leaves ... you. Like this:

"yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if it's weaker?"

Now, me, I clearly said the jet stream was weaker.

 

[jc456]

To summarize the physics behind it ...

The northern polar jet stream is driven by temperature differences between the arctic and mid-latitudes.

The arctic is warming faster than the mid-latitudes, so there's less of a difference, so the northern polar jet is weakening.

When the jet stream weakens, it meanders more, like a slow river.

Those big meandering loops mean that big masses of warm air can move further north, and big masses of cold air can move further south. Which is exactly what we see.

So, climate science was proven 100% correct again, and the crybaby deniers are having their usual meltdowns over it. Same old same old.

yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if the jet streams are weaker? dude/ dudette, that makes absolutely no sense. The polar Vortex is moved based on temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic which cause the convection of the jet stream to change and it forces it south. It's in the libturd's favorite resource Wikipedia. Go read yourself up there them good ole facts on what causes the Vortex to move.

And let me know when you have all those temperature records from the north pole. Santa sending them to ya?

Corrected.

 

[jc456]

Well, I certainly didn't say the polar vortex was weaker, and someone said it, so that leaves ... you. Like this:

"yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if it's weaker?"

Now, me, I clearly said the jet stream was weaker.

I errored in that statement, I went back and corrected it. to say the jet streams are weaker.

 

[Billy_Bob]

To summarize the physics behind it ...

The northern polar jet stream is driven by temperature differences between the arctic and mid-latitudes.

The arctic is warming faster than the mid-latitudes, so there's less of a difference, so the northern polar jet is weakening.

When the jet stream weakens, it meanders more, like a slow river.

Those big meandering loops mean that big masses of warm air can move further north, and big masses of cold air can move further south. Which is exactly what we see.

So, climate science was proven 100% correct again, and the crybaby deniers are having their usual meltdowns over it. Same old same old.

yoo, so, how is it then that the polar vortex can cause the mayhem in the Northeast lower latitudes if the jet streams are weaker? dude/ dudette, that makes absolutely no sense. The polar Vortex is moved based on temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic which cause the convection of the jet stream to change and it forces it south. It's in the libturd's favorite resource Wikipedia. Go read yourself up there them good ole facts on what causes the Vortex to move.

And let me know when you have all those temperature records from the north pole. Santa sending them to ya?

Corrected.

Snagletooth cant figure it out.. The polar vortex (polar low) is three times the average size 1980-2000. What would cause an increase of low pressure.. Temperature drop or heat loss above the poles. The polar jet is twice the average size and has increased in strength the last 5 years.

I dont know where that hairball is getting its information but the facts are directly opposite of the hairballs lies.

 

[9aces]

So you're saying you're too stupid to understand the question.

Don't get upset just because I pointed out you asked a stupid question. Instead, try asking less stupid questions. The next question is a good start.

If getting warmer is so bad....why?

Because human civilization was built around the current climate, and suddenly changing means teentsy little problems such as fertile areas for agriculture being no longer fertile, leading to mass starvation. Or areas where a billion people live being flooded, resulting in those billion people needing to move somewhere else.

Genocide fantasies? I have no idea what you're talking about. Are you just attempting to deflect since you apparently won't answer the question?

So you're no longer fantasizing about someone taking over the world and kill off most the population? Good, that's progress.

Actually son, that's your global warming true believer's requirement. What you want, isn't possible without eliminating the other world governments and killing off a fair bit of the population. And even then it will do nothing.

I didn't ask a stupid question, you dodged it, I pointed out you dodged it...and you looked stupid doing it. I would say I'm sorry about making you look stupid...but then I'd have to be sorry.

Human civilization was built around the current climate...which is an environment that's come into being after....a fisking ice age. If you were paying attention during global temperature history class...which apparently you weren't, this is not the first time this has happened.

News flash princess, it won't be the last. You seem to think it's possible for man to either stop, or start a warming/cooling trend. It is not within man's capability to do so. He can fractionally affect said trends, but only marginally.

So if the seas rise some over the next 10,000 or so years, man will have to adapt. Man's good at that you might have noticed.

If you were paying attention in global temperature history class...you'd know the average mean temperature of the planet through it's history is quite a bit warmer than now. Better start looking at some new beachfront property. Your many times great grandchildren (assuming the world's unlucky enough for you to reproduce) will thank you for your foresight.