Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Get over it.
The species is strengthened from variation in the gene pool.
Children today are not viewed as descendants of the Slave/Master system except by nutcases like you. We don't need to revisit the past. Look forward to our mixed-race future. Hooray!
Who species is strenthened?,the Caucasian race has many genetic mutations
in their gene pool. Who's species is strenthened Reilly T?.I for one feel the Black race contaminates its gene pool by mixing
with other races.The Black race being the oringinal, and oldest gene pool, according to anthropological studies.
Just because someone is Ethiopian does not mean that have any more knowledge than anyone else. For example, many people believe that men have always worn pants or that people have always been world travelers.
It would seem that anywhere Caucasians, whites and Arabs, colonized they would have left some genetic imprint. Some people will always mix that is just they do and have always done.
On eithiopians specifically? At least 5-6, most by Paloni or Sforza. And, sorry to say, but, yes, the Oromo are "more white" than they are black. Cry about it. Or go to sleep and dream your little afro-fantasies. A little dancing sambo in Egypt and the horn of Africa no doubt.
Say good-bye to dancing sambo.
Notably, 62% of the Ethiopians fall in the first cluster, which encompasses the majority of the Jews, Norwegians and Armenians, indicating that placement of these individuals in a Black cluster would be an inaccurate reflection of the genetic structure. Only 24% of the Ethiopians are placed in the cluster with the Bantu and most of the Afro-Caribbeans. (Passarino et al. 1998)
On the basis of historical, linguistic, and genetic data, it has been suggested that the Ethiopian population has been strongly affected by Caucasoid migrations since Neolithic times. On the basis of autosomal polymorphic loci, it has been estimated that 60% of the Ethiopian gene pool has an African origin, whereas ~40% is of Caucasoid derivation . Our Ethiopian sample also lacks the sY81-G allele, which was associated with 86% and 69% of Senegalese and mixed-African YAP+ chromosomes, respectively. This suggests that male-mediated gene flow from Niger-Congo speakers to the Ethiopian population was probably very limited Caucasoid gene flow into the Ethiopian gene pool occurred predominantly through males. Conversely, the Niger-Congo contribution to the Ethiopian population occurred mainly through females. (Poloni et al. 1997)
Ethiopian mitochondrial DNA heritage: tracking gen...[Am J Hum Genet. 2004] - PubMed Result
Human Biology 75.2 (2003) 293-300
The occurrence of E*5 212 and E*5 204 alleles in two populations of the Mediterranean basin (Turkey and Italy) but not in West Africans can be explained by taking into account that the Ethiopian gene pool was estimated to be >40% of Caucasoid derivation (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994). In addition, more recent phylogenetic analysis based on classical protein polymorphism (Tartaglia et al. 1996) and Y-chromosome sequence variation (Underhill et al. 2000) showed that Ethiopians appear to be distinct from Africans and more closely associated with populations of the Mediterranean basin.
Genetic Variation at Apolipoprotein E Locus in Ethiopia:
An E5 Variant Corresponds to Two Different Mutant Alleles: E*5 (Glu212Lys) and E*5 (Gln204Lys; Cys112Arg) R. Scacchi et al.
Approximately 10 miles separate the Horn of Africa from the Arabian Peninsula at Bab-el-Mandeb (the Gate of Tears). Both historic and archaeological evidence indicate tight cultural connections, over millennia, between these two regions. High-resolution phylogenetic analysis of 270 Ethiopian and 115 Yemeni mitochondrial DNAs was performed in a worldwide context, to explore gene flow across the Red and Arabian Seas. Nine distinct subclades, including three newly defined ones, were found to characterize entirely the variation of Ethiopian and Yemeni L3 lineages. Both Ethiopians and Yemenis contain an almost-equal proportion of Eurasian-specific M and N and African-specific lineages and therefore cluster together in a multidimensional scaling plot between Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African populations. Phylogeographic identification of potential founder haplotypes revealed that approximately one-half of haplogroup L0-L5 lineages in Yemenis have close or matching counterparts in southeastern Africans, compared with a minor share in Ethiopians. Newly defined clade L6, the most frequent haplogroup in Yemenis, showed no close matches among 3,000 African samples. These results highlight the complexity of Ethiopian and Yemeni genetic heritage and are consistent with the introduction of maternal lineages into the South Arabian gene pool from different source populations of East Africa. A high proportion of Ethiopian lineages, significantly more abundant in the northeast of that country, trace their western Eurasian origin in haplogroup N through assorted gene flow at different times and involving different source populations. (Toomas Kivisild et al.)
Though present-day Ethiopia is a land of great ethnic diversity, the majority of Ethiopians speak different Semitic, Cushitic, and Omotic languages that belong to the Afro-Asiatic linguistic phylum. Maternal lineages of Semitic- (Amharic, Tigrinya, and Gurage) and Cushitic- (Oromo and Afar) speaking populations studied here reveal that their mtDNA pool is a nearly equal composite of sub-Saharan and western Eurasian lineages. This finding, consistent with classic genetic-marker studies (Cavalli-Sforza 1997) and previous mtDNA results, is also in agreement with a similarly high proportion of western Asian Y chromosomes in Ethiopians (Passarino et al. 1998; Semino et al. 2002), which supports the view (Richards et al. 2003) that the observed admixture between sub-Saharan African and, most probably, western Asian ancestors of the Ethiopian populations applies to their gene pool in general. (Am. J. Hum. Genet., 75:000, 2004)
The present composition of the Ethiopian population is the result of a complex and extensive intermixing of different peoples of North African, Near and Middle Eastern, and south-Saharan origin. The two main groups inhabiting the country are the Amhara, descended from Arabian conquerors, and the Oromo, the most important group among the Cushitic people. The genetic distance analysis showed the separation between African and non-African populations, with the Amhara and Oromo located in an intermediate position. (De Stefano et al. 2002)
Non sub-Saharan African samples are all grouped together with the Ethiopian Amharic sample [on the Y-chromosome]. Ethiopians are not statistically differentiated from the Egyptian and Tunisian samples, in agreement with their linguistic affiliation with the Afro-Asiatic family. (Scacchi et al. 2003)
You idiot, I know where you got that information from, and I personally debated the person who wrote that nonsense.
S'ok afropuff, even Sambos have to die sometime.
The person did not "write it"; it's almost entirely copied verbatim from the studies listed. I guess you have a problem with some of the greatest population geneticists on the planet, eh?
S'ok afropuff, even Sambos have to die sometime.
The person did not "write it"; it's almost entirely copied verbatim from the studies listed. I guess you have a problem with some of the greatest population geneticists on the planet, eh?
I sure did. And I verified half the exceprts. It's legit. You are not. You are a pathological lieing afropuff of dogshit.
Verify for your own dumb ass self:
http://ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/Wilson-NatGen-01-GDR.pdf
Search for "notably" and kiss Sambo good-bye. Do I need to hold your hand to check all the other cites?
That's right. What he's saying, which you are probably too stupid to understand, is that he classified them on the basis of the Y-chromosome, which would only gauge a male gene flow. But, then you need to calibrated for the mtDNA, which goes through the female line. This is why Sforza came to a ~40% caucasian admixture when he calculated both and not a 62% caucasian figure.
You clearly don't know wtf you are talking about, and I doubt emailing anyone will rectify the problem.
Sforza didn't study the mtDNA and Y chromosone of Ethiopians, he did an autosomal study you moron, that was published almost 12 years ago.
Save the babble. Sforza, the greatest modern human population geneticist says that the Ethiopians are 40% caucasian.
THE END.
I don't remember. But if you expect me to believe they were doing autosomal analysis in the early 80's, you must take me and anyone reading this for an idiot. 99.9% of the people reading this won't know how ridiculous that claim is given what sforza was trying to accomplish.
What study do you believe he used, btw? Full citation.
How is 12 years ago the early 80s you moron? Have you read Sforza's book?
Why the fuck did you say "Almost 12 years ago", then?
His book and first ethiopian study was in 1994, the one cited. How the fuck does 2008-1994 = "almost 12 years ago"?
I thought you were saying that the study he used in his 1994 was already 12 years old. It's the only thing that made sense. Even a monkey knows 2008-1994 is not "almost 12 years".
He did later study which I've read, Y-chromosome, which matched his early studies. So it doesn't matter in my mind if was looking at autosomes or not in 1994. I'm not tracking down his 50 pound lexicon to look.
