Bizarre Hypothetical Outcome of Impeachment

[Crepitus]

He got a blowjob.

He perjured himself in a sexual harassment lawsuit.

No. He got a blowjob and that's all you republicans criminal could pin on him.

Talk about witch hunts.

President Clinton admits he lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in 2001


Talk about witch hunts.

Leave poor, drunken Hillary out of this.

Republicans went on a witch Hunt. They put a fairly honest guy in an untenable position and tried to punish him for it. And they failed miserably, even thought they held the senate.

All that shows us is how dishonest all the Democrats Senators and some Republican Senators were. It was clear Bill Clinton committed perjury which is a felony, and of course, a higher crime than a misdemeanor the Constitution outlines. Any honest Senator would have voted for removal.

No, it shows us that the republican party wasn't totally corrupted yet.

They are now.

 

[Crepitus]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

You kids still haven't figured out why what tRump did is wrong, have you.

No. Joe Biden was the point man of an internation push to get the corrupt prosecutor removed. There was no motive of personal gain.

There isn't? How about the video of the Shokin interview where he said he was clamping down on Burisma and in particular, Hunter, for money laundering?

After the fact ass-covering.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

He perjured himself in a sexual harassment lawsuit.

No. He got a blowjob and that's all you republicans criminal could pin on him.

Talk about witch hunts.

President Clinton admits he lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in 2001


Talk about witch hunts.

Leave poor, drunken Hillary out of this.

Republicans went on a witch Hunt. They put a fairly honest guy in an untenable position and tried to punish him for it. And they failed miserably, even thought they held the senate.

All that shows us is how dishonest all the Democrats Senators and some Republican Senators were. It was clear Bill Clinton committed perjury which is a felony, and of course, a higher crime than a misdemeanor the Constitution outlines. Any honest Senator would have voted for removal.

No, it shows us that the republican party wasn't totally corrupted yet.

They are now.

How would they be corrupt by following the definition of impeachment laid out in the US Constitution? Corrupt is not following the reasons for impeachment, and just voting to keep the President in regardless of the violations.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Yes he broke the law and was disbarred

He got a blowjob.

He perjured himself in a sexual harassment lawsuit.

No. He got a blowjob and that's all you republicans criminal could pin on him.

Talk about witch hunts.

President Clinton admits he lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in 2001


Talk about witch hunts.

Leave poor, drunken Hillary out of this.

Republicans went on a witch Hunt. They put a fairly honest guy in an untenable position and tried to punish him for it. And they failed miserably, even thought they held the senate.

a fairly honest guy?.....lol.....

 

[colfax_m]

Maybe, just maybe it isn’t fake?

It is fake. Not one violation of high crimes or misdemeanors. They charged him with obstruction, when Obama did the exact same thing. They charged him with trying to "dig up dirt" on his opponent, and nobody knew (and we still don't know) who his opponent was going to be, especially given the fact this took place back in July of last year. They sited a quid pro quo, yet Zelensky never looked into the Biden's as far as we know, and Trump never got anything in return for releasing military aid. Zelensky even said in public he didn't feel pressure of any kind from President Trump.

So how are their charges genuine or justified?

Obama didn't do the exact same thing. Trump sees Biden as a political opponent. The aid was released before Zelinsky made the announcement because Trump's drug deal was exposed.

You're not being truthful.

And that's more Democrat BS. Think for a minute: If the Democrats suspected that Trump was going to use a quid pro quo, why didn't they wait until he actually did it? Why did they go into panic mode when they discovered that Trump asked Zelensky to look into Burisma and the Biden's? Then they might have had a solid case.

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

 

[Crepitus]

He got a blowjob.

And, like all you liberals, lied about it.

Had 2020 societal norms been in place at the time he'd have been Epstein's cell/soul mate. To the very end.

He got a blowjob.

Conservitards freaked out. Probably because they never get them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He got a blowjob.

And, like all you liberals, lied about it.

Had 2020 societal norms been in place at the time he'd have been Epstein's cell/soul mate. To the very end.

He got a blowjob.

Conservitards freaked out. Probably because they never get them.

He got a blowjob.

He sexually harassed underlings.

 

[Crepitus]

No. He got a blowjob and that's all you republicans criminal could pin on him.

Talk about witch hunts.

President Clinton admits he lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in 2001


Talk about witch hunts.

Leave poor, drunken Hillary out of this.

Republicans went on a witch Hunt. They put a fairly honest guy in an untenable position and tried to punish him for it. And they failed miserably, even thought they held the senate.

All that shows us is how dishonest all the Democrats Senators and some Republican Senators were. It was clear Bill Clinton committed perjury which is a felony, and of course, a higher crime than a misdemeanor the Constitution outlines. Any honest Senator would have voted for removal.

No, it shows us that the republican party wasn't totally corrupted yet.

They are now.

How would they be corrupt by following the definition of impeachment laid out in the US Constitution? Corrupt is not following the reasons for impeachment, and just voting to keep the President in regardless of the violations.

I said they weren't totally corrupt at the time.

 

[Crepitus]

He got a blowjob.

And, like all you liberals, lied about it.

Had 2020 societal norms been in place at the time he'd have been Epstein's cell/soul mate. To the very end.

He got a blowjob.

Conservitards freaked out. Probably because they never get them.

He got a blowjob.

He sexually harassed underlings.

He got a blowjob.

 

[colfax_m]

I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Y’all impeached Clinton. Did you forget that?

Clinton committed an actual crime. Lying to avoid paying the money he owed a broad for sexually harassing her. And i don't care if the gal posed in Playboy, Penthouse or Gargantuan Butts magazine, that doesn't give anyone license to sexually harass them.

Y’all call that a process crime now a days.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It is fake. Not one violation of high crimes or misdemeanors. They charged him with obstruction, when Obama did the exact same thing. They charged him with trying to "dig up dirt" on his opponent, and nobody knew (and we still don't know) who his opponent was going to be, especially given the fact this took place back in July of last year. They sited a quid pro quo, yet Zelensky never looked into the Biden's as far as we know, and Trump never got anything in return for releasing military aid. Zelensky even said in public he didn't feel pressure of any kind from President Trump.

So how are their charges genuine or justified?

Obama didn't do the exact same thing. Trump sees Biden as a political opponent. The aid was released before Zelinsky made the announcement because Trump's drug deal was exposed.

You're not being truthful.

And that's more Democrat BS. Think for a minute: If the Democrats suspected that Trump was going to use a quid pro quo, why didn't they wait until he actually did it? Why did they go into panic mode when they discovered that Trump asked Zelensky to look into Burisma and the Biden's? Then they might have had a solid case.

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

President Clinton admits he lied under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky in 2001


Talk about witch hunts.

Leave poor, drunken Hillary out of this.

Republicans went on a witch Hunt. They put a fairly honest guy in an untenable position and tried to punish him for it. And they failed miserably, even thought they held the senate.

All that shows us is how dishonest all the Democrats Senators and some Republican Senators were. It was clear Bill Clinton committed perjury which is a felony, and of course, a higher crime than a misdemeanor the Constitution outlines. Any honest Senator would have voted for removal.

No, it shows us that the republican party wasn't totally corrupted yet.

They are now.

How would they be corrupt by following the definition of impeachment laid out in the US Constitution? Corrupt is not following the reasons for impeachment, and just voting to keep the President in regardless of the violations.

I said they weren't totally corrupt at the time.

Correct. The non-corrupt ones voted to have him removed.

 

[Polishprince]

I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Y’all impeached Clinton. Did you forget that?

Clinton committed an actual crime. Lying to avoid paying the money he owed a broad for sexually harassing her. And i don't care if the gal posed in Playboy, Penthouse or Gargantuan Butts magazine, that doesn't give anyone license to sexually harass them.

Y’all call that a process crime now a days.

I'd call it crime of greed- literally armed robbery against Ms. Jones.

Clinton might as well just used a gun in his attempt to cheat her.

But Congress didn't think it was serious enough, and I respect that. If the Democrats nominate and elect Mike Avenatti, the Republican shouldn't impeach him for his crimes based on the precedence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He got a blowjob.

And, like all you liberals, lied about it.

Had 2020 societal norms been in place at the time he'd have been Epstein's cell/soul mate. To the very end.

He got a blowjob.

Conservitards freaked out. Probably because they never get them.

He got a blowjob.

He sexually harassed underlings.

He got a blowjob.

And he sexually harassed underlings.

 

[colfax_m]

Obama didn't do the exact same thing. Trump sees Biden as a political opponent. The aid was released before Zelinsky made the announcement because Trump's drug deal was exposed.

You're not being truthful.

And that's more Democrat BS. Think for a minute: If the Democrats suspected that Trump was going to use a quid pro quo, why didn't they wait until he actually did it? Why did they go into panic mode when they discovered that Trump asked Zelensky to look into Burisma and the Biden's? Then they might have had a solid case.

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And that's more Democrat BS. Think for a minute: If the Democrats suspected that Trump was going to use a quid pro quo, why didn't they wait until he actually did it? Why did they go into panic mode when they discovered that Trump asked Zelensky to look into Burisma and the Biden's? Then they might have had a solid case.

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump.

If Biden didn't do anything wrong, how would an investigation help Trump?

 

[colfax_m]

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump.

If Biden didn't do anything wrong, how would an investigation help Trump?

When did y’all ever care what the outcome of an investigation showed? Y’all just say whatever you want anyway.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump.

If Biden didn't do anything wrong, how would an investigation help Trump?

When did y’all ever care what the outcome of an investigation showed? Y’all just say whatever you want anyway.

When did y’all ever care what the outcome of an investigation showed?

You don't want to learn the truth? I'm shocked!

 

[colfax_m]

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump.

If Biden didn't do anything wrong, how would an investigation help Trump?

When did y’all ever care what the outcome of an investigation showed? Y’all just say whatever you want anyway.

When did y’all ever care what the outcome of an investigation showed?

You don't want to learn the truth? I'm shocked!

Didn’t you listen to the testimony in the House?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And that's more Democrat BS. Think for a minute: If the Democrats suspected that Trump was going to use a quid pro quo, why didn't they wait until he actually did it? Why did they go into panic mode when they discovered that Trump asked Zelensky to look into Burisma and the Biden's? Then they might have had a solid case.

Judge rejects Obama's executive privilege claim over Fast and Furious records

Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.

You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.

When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.

You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.

It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.

Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.

Isn't that what a lawyer is supposed to do? Would you hire a lawyer that didn't want to help you?