Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So are Mexicans and Muslims....Wallace was right wing, nothing you can say changes that.Slaves worked with many other workers they didn't build it themselves
So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Wallace was a democrat
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
Wallace was a conservative and said so himself.
Wallace was a democrat, nothing you can say changes that.
The way the first lady uses it, it does..She takes advantage of people's ignorance..Like this idiot congressman who thinks George Wallace was a Republican.Why do Conservatives struggle with the term "only"
To say that black lives matter does not mean "only" black lives matter
To say slaves built the White House does not mean "only" slaves built the White House
Well, Wallace sure as hell wouldn't be a Democrat today would he? When President Johnson said he'd lose the south for a generation, Wallace was the kind of Democrat he was talking about losing. (Goodbye to bad rubbish)
Oh, and do explain how Mrs Obama's statement "takes advantage of people's ignorance"? What would people be "ignorant" about that you feel needed clarification? What is the importance of pointing out that the slaves were "well fed" when Mrs. Obama was not saying they weren't?
Slaves worked with many other workers they didn't build it themselves
So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Wallace was a democrat
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
The way the first lady uses it, it does..She takes advantage of people's ignorance..Like this idiot congressman who thinks George Wallace was a Republican.
Well, Wallace sure as hell wouldn't be a Democrat today would he? When President Johnson said he'd lose the south for a generation, Wallace was the kind of Democrat he was talking about losing. (Goodbye to bad rubbish)
Oh, and do explain how Mrs Obama's statement "takes advantage of people's ignorance"? What would people be "ignorant" about that you feel needed clarification? What is the importance of pointing out that the slaves were "well fed" when Mrs. Obama was not saying they weren't?
Slaves worked with many other workers they didn't build it themselves
So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Wallace was a democrat
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
I didn't say anything about his running, I asked which party you think he'd belong to. There's really no room for another racists asshole running for President when you have Trump. I asked if he would be Democrat or a Republican, but you can't seem to answer that honestly. It's because you know damn good and well that Wallace would be a full throat-ed Trump supporter. When you can't tell the difference between a Trump quote and a Wallace quote, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure it out.
Republicans also believe they were "happy" because they "sang all the time".
Talk about a "mixed message". On one hand they say the slaves were well fed and happy because they sang.
On the other hand, they insist it was Republican Conservatives that freed the slaves.
The obvious question is why free the slave if they were so happy eating and singing.
Agree
Todays Republicans brag about how they freed the slaves at the same time they defend the institution of slavery
Slaves were happy and well fed
Slaves were better off for being slaves
You know...black people owned slaves too
My ancestor was Irish and he was a slave too
If you're from the South and a Conservative, your father or grandfather was in the Democratic Party.Well, Wallace sure as hell wouldn't be a Democrat today would he? When President Johnson said he'd lose the south for a generation, Wallace was the kind of Democrat he was talking about losing. (Goodbye to bad rubbish)
Oh, and do explain how Mrs Obama's statement "takes advantage of people's ignorance"? What would people be "ignorant" about that you feel needed clarification? What is the importance of pointing out that the slaves were "well fed" when Mrs. Obama was not saying they weren't?
Slaves worked with many other workers they didn't build it themselves
So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Wallace was a democrat
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
I didn't say anything about his running, I asked which party you think he'd belong to. There's really no room for another racists asshole running for President when you have Trump. I asked if he would be Democrat or a Republican, but you can't seem to answer that honestly. It's because you know damn good and well that Wallace would be a full throat-ed Trump supporter. When you can't tell the difference between a Trump quote and a Wallace quote, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure it out.
LOL....Trump isn't even a real conservative... Wallace was tyrannical leftist Democrat.. why cant you admit your party is the party of slavery and of the subjugation of Black people... You think American citizens have no more rights than illegal law breakers nothing to do with race most Syrian muslims are white people actually
If you're from the South and a Conservative, your father or grandfather was in the Democratic Party.Slaves worked with many other workers they didn't build it themselves
So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Wallace was a democrat
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
I didn't say anything about his running, I asked which party you think he'd belong to. There's really no room for another racists asshole running for President when you have Trump. I asked if he would be Democrat or a Republican, but you can't seem to answer that honestly. It's because you know damn good and well that Wallace would be a full throat-ed Trump supporter. When you can't tell the difference between a Trump quote and a Wallace quote, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure it out.
LOL....Trump isn't even a real conservative... Wallace was tyrannical leftist Democrat.. why cant you admit your party is the party of slavery and of the subjugation of Black people... You think American citizens have no more rights than illegal law breakers nothing to do with race most Syrian muslims are white people actually
If you're from the South and a Conservative, your father or grandfather was in the Democratic Party.So? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Again, yes and? Would he be one today? Would Wallace be a Democrat or a Republican today? Do try to be honest.
He wouldn't be in politics today, but the "Democratic" party is the party of slavery, segregation, and lynching... Deal with girl.
I didn't say anything about his running, I asked which party you think he'd belong to. There's really no room for another racists asshole running for President when you have Trump. I asked if he would be Democrat or a Republican, but you can't seem to answer that honestly. It's because you know damn good and well that Wallace would be a full throat-ed Trump supporter. When you can't tell the difference between a Trump quote and a Wallace quote, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure it out.
LOL....Trump isn't even a real conservative... Wallace was tyrannical leftist Democrat.. why cant you admit your party is the party of slavery and of the subjugation of Black people... You think American citizens have no more rights than illegal law breakers nothing to do with race most Syrian muslims are white people actually
That party should have been shut down long ago.. they owe reparations
It is an argument that even the lowest class in a western society has a better life than the highest class in a non-western country(region of a continent).You are far more likely to change your mind about how evil slavery is than I am.There is a reason why that defense still stands today.Its the same old conservative defense of....they were better off as slaves than "jungle bunnies"
Hey look, a guy who wants to bring back slavery.
wow, the closet door must have fallen off its hinges.
Saying that black slaves in America had it better than Sub-Saharan Africans is not making an argument to bring back slavery at all.
It's an argument that being enslaved is better than being free.
Slavery in Africa was 100s of times worse also.
So the slaves in the area were well fed while it was being built, and then under fed after that.So stating simple historical facts are something to be avoided? Tell us oh all knowing one, where did he get it wrong?
Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
Great, all deflection, you got any quotes that are directed at the specific slaves that were legally used at the WH that refute O'Rilly's statements?
lol, I quote someone who was there, at the time, looking AT the actual slaves,
and that's a deflection.
Oh right, she was living in it after construction was completed, she observed landscaping, not the actual construction didn't she.
Yeah...okaaaaayyyy...
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
So stating simple historical facts are something to be avoided? Tell us oh all knowing one, where did he get it wrong?
Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
So much for slavery apologist O'Reilly about how well they were taken care of
And you're retarded enough to bleev they were well fed and happy as larks. Because Bill said so.So the slaves in the area were well fed while it was being built, and then under fed after that.Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
Great, all deflection, you got any quotes that are directed at the specific slaves that were legally used at the WH that refute O'Rilly's statements?
lol, I quote someone who was there, at the time, looking AT the actual slaves,
and that's a deflection.
Oh right, she was living in it after construction was completed, she observed landscaping, not the actual construction didn't she.
Yeah...okaaaaayyyy...
Is that what O'Reilly commented on, the slaves in the area, no, he commented specifically on the ones working on the construction of the WH. Reading is fundamental.
So stating simple historical facts are something to be avoided? Tell us oh all knowing one, where did he get it wrong?
Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
Great, all deflection, you got any quotes that are directed at the specific slaves that were legally used at the WH that refute O'Rilly's statements?
lol, I quote someone who was there, at the time, looking AT the actual slaves,
and that's a deflection.
Oh right, she was living in it after construction was completed, she observed landscaping, not the actual construction didn't she.
Her letter was dated November 1800. The whitehouse wasn't finished.
What's O'Reilly's reliable source?
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
So stating simple historical facts are something to be avoided? Tell us oh all knowing one, where did he get it wrong?
Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
So much for slavery apologist O'Reilly about how well they were taken care of
The argument that slaves were well cared for was common to the defense of slavery. O'Reilly, for god knows what reason, is just carrying that on.
So the slaves in the area were well fed while it was being built, and then under fed after that.Then someone who was from those times should also be believed, such as Abigail Adams, who said:
Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, ... to labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast.
How Abigail Adams Proves Bill O'Reilly Wrong About Slavery
Great, all deflection, you got any quotes that are directed at the specific slaves that were legally used at the WH that refute O'Rilly's statements?
lol, I quote someone who was there, at the time, looking AT the actual slaves,
and that's a deflection.
Oh right, she was living in it after construction was completed, she observed landscaping, not the actual construction didn't she.
Yeah...okaaaaayyyy...
The idea that whether or not SLAVES were well fed would even be in an argument over slavery...
...an ARGUMENT over slavery?
What fucking century have we been transported to?
O'Reilly's statement was a bizarre, perverse attempt to denigrate Michelle Obama. Nothing more, nothing less.
Wow, those descendants of Conservative Southern Democrats, are still defending slavery.
And you're retarded enough to bleev they were well fed and happy as larks. Because Bill said so.So the slaves in the area were well fed while it was being built, and then under fed after that.Great, all deflection, you got any quotes that are directed at the specific slaves that were legally used at the WH that refute O'Rilly's statements?
lol, I quote someone who was there, at the time, looking AT the actual slaves,
and that's a deflection.
Oh right, she was living in it after construction was completed, she observed landscaping, not the actual construction didn't she.
Yeah...okaaaaayyyy...
Is that what O'Reilly commented on, the slaves in the area, no, he commented specifically on the ones working on the construction of the WH. Reading is fundamental.
