Berger Fined $50,000.00 For "Mishandling" Classified Documents

Discussion in 'Politics' started by GotZoom, Sep 8, 2005.

  1. GotZoom
    Offline

    GotZoom Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,719
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Cordova, TN
    Ratings:
    +366
    They should have locked him up and throw away the key.

    ----

    WASHINGTON — Sandy Berger (search), President Clinton's national security adviser who was once entrusted with the nation's most sensitive secrets, was fined $50,000 Thursday for taking classified documents from the National Archives.

    U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson handed down the punishment in federal court, stiffening the $10,000 fine recommended by government lawyers. Under the deal, Berger avoids prison time but he must surrender access to classified government materials for three years.

    "The court finds the fine is inadequate because it doesn't reflect the seriousness of the offense," Robinson said, as a grim-faced Berger stood silently.

    She also sentenced Berger to two years' probation and 100 hours of community service.

    Earlier in the hearing, Berger made a short emotional plea that admitted fault and expressed remorse for his crime.

    "I let considerations of personal convenience override clear rules of handling classified material," said Berger, calling his actions a lapse of judgment that came while he was preparing to testify before the Sept. 11 commission (search) last year.

    "In this case, I failed. I will not again," he said.

    The sentencing capped a bizarre sequence of events in which Berger admitted to sneaking classified documents out of the National Archives (search) in his suit, later destroying some of them in his office and then lying about it.

    Berger's lawyer, Lanny Breuer, said his client will not appeal the sentence.

    The Bush administration disclosed the investigation in July 2004, just days before the Sept. 11 commission issued its final report. Democrats claimed the White House was using Berger to deflect attention from the harsh findings, with their potential for damaging President Bush's re-election prospects.

    Initially saying his actions were an "honest mistake," Berger later pleaded guilty in April to a misdemeanor of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material, which contained information relating to terror threats in the United States during the 2000 millennium celebration.

    During Thursday's hearing, Breuer characterized Berger as an official eager to get the facts of the Sept. 11 attacks right when he improperly took classified documents and handwritten notes from the Archives.

    "The tragedy of 9/11 weighed heavily on him," Breuer said.

    Robinson repeatedly questioned Breuer and government lawyers about a provision in federal law that calls for examining a defendant's financial background when issuing punishments. Both attorneys responded that they believed a $10,000 fine was still appropriate.

    The Associated Press first reported in July 2004 that the Justice Department was investigating Berger. The disclosure prompted Berger to step down as an adviser to the campaign of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry.

    Clinton was among the Democrats who questioned the timing of the disclosure of the Berger probe three days before the release of the Sept. 11 report. Leaders of the Sept. 11 commission said they were able to get every key document needed to complete their report.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168828,00.html
     
  2. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403

    Did anyone ever find out what was on those documents ? Someone surely knows.
     
  3. GotZoom
    Offline

    GotZoom Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,719
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Cordova, TN
    Ratings:
    +366
    "Initially saying his actions were an "honest mistake," Berger later pleaded guilty in April to a misdemeanor of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material, which contained information relating to terror threats in the United States during the 2000 millennium celebration."

    So he says.

    I wonder though, if the "recovered" documents discusses the millennium celbrations where the "destroyed" documents covered Wild Bills mistakes with OBL.
     
  4. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Thats what I'm thinking---they could certainly release the general contents of the information and let people come to thier own conclusions--or maybe this stuff is just too hush hush and smells like dirty socks.
     
  5. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    YEP!
     
  6. ThomasPaine
    Offline

    ThomasPaine Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +66
    pocket for the fine. Clintonista money to the rescue along with a "well done" and pat on the shoulder. There were incriminating documents destroyed no doubt about it. Why else go to the lengths he did. It was a cover up for Clinton pure and simple. The dishonesty of the Clintonistas is unparalleled in American history. Makes Haldeman, Erlichman, and Nixon seem like rank amateurs..
     

Share This Page