Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BULLSHIT! YOU LIE! I have posted evidence proving you wrong about this numerous times.What happened when the attack is not that important based on THIS:
1. HILLARY & BARRY KNEW AN ATTACK WAS COMING ON O9/11/12.
- That attack was the 3rd (THIRD) and final attack on the compound. Other nations pulled their people out before this attack Hillary and Barry CHOSE not to...the Americans were there...and died...because they left them there to die.
2. HILLARY & BARRY KNEW there was going to be a MIDDLE EAST-WIDE attack on 9/11/12.
- 22 Embassies and compounds were attacked on 9/11/12. 2 were overrun. Americans died in only 1 of the attacks. Only THAT attack was explained as a 'PROREST OVER A VIDEO'.
3. Every other nation had pulled their people out because of the growing violence and pending attack on 9/11/12. Again, Hillary and Barry CHOSE to leave them there, to abandon them.
4. The 2nd attack on the compound left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall...Ambassador Stephens warned the State Department afterward that they would never survive a 3rd larger attack. The State Department / Hillary responded by not only rejecting another request for additional security but also TOOK AWAY some of the compound's security ... and still left them there to die in the attack on 9/11/12 still to come.
'Nothing came of the investigations...Hillary and Barry made no mistakes, did nothing wrong.'
OH, STFU!
4 Americans are dead because they CHOSE not to save them.
No. They didn't know ahead of time - there wasn't any actionable intelligence. It's like the claims that Bush could have prevented 9/11. There were multiple western embassies still there prior to the attack and remaining there after the attack.
Even if you were right, which you are NOT, if Hillary and Barry / the Obama administration's Intel did not know about a Middle East-wide highly coordinated attack on the anniversary of 9/11 (other countries cited the pending attack as part of the reason they were pulling out), then they still F*-ED UP / FAILED MASSIVELY!
4 Americans are dead....' who cares'.who cares? the final report said she wasnt responsible. plus nobodys making a stink about the oct 2017 niger attack.Hillary texted a foreign Ambassador saying she knew immediately it was a terrorist attack.I have posted it many times here. You can search Benghazi. I’ll give you one then you can search for the many others. It was not a video and they knew it wasn’t from the get-go, proven by their emails. Hillary let her daughter know immediately.They aren’t playing politics. They tried to get the truth out there, which much of the lies were uncovered, just never carried by the left wing media. That is a patriot, trying to expose the truth. A coverup is, well... aThat is sickening.
And more sickening is the left don’t care and will even seek to destroy anyone that gets in their way.
Paronto has no issues with the GOP using this to play politics with this. He clearly is a partisan hack. Hardly a patriot.
What specific lies and what cover up?
No shIt - the Ambassador in Tripoli testified that he called the DOJ 5 minutes after the attack began and told them it was a terrorist attack.
The Tripoli Team sent a report to the WH and to Hillary at the DOJ. The report was modified 13 times - every reference to terrorism and a terrorist attack was stripped from the report before it was released to the public.
'Nothing revealed in the investigations'.
- LIARS!
BULLSHIT! YOU LIE! I have posted evidence proving you wrong about this numerous times.What happened when the attack is not that important based on THIS:
1. HILLARY & BARRY KNEW AN ATTACK WAS COMING ON O9/11/12.
- That attack was the 3rd (THIRD) and final attack on the compound. Other nations pulled their people out before this attack Hillary and Barry CHOSE not to...the Americans were there...and died...because they left them there to die.
2. HILLARY & BARRY KNEW there was going to be a MIDDLE EAST-WIDE attack on 9/11/12.
- 22 Embassies and compounds were attacked on 9/11/12. 2 were overrun. Americans died in only 1 of the attacks. Only THAT attack was explained as a 'PROREST OVER A VIDEO'.
3. Every other nation had pulled their people out because of the growing violence and pending attack on 9/11/12. Again, Hillary and Barry CHOSE to leave them there, to abandon them.
4. The 2nd attack on the compound left a 4-foot hole in the compound wall...Ambassador Stephens warned the State Department afterward that they would never survive a 3rd larger attack. The State Department / Hillary responded by not only rejecting another request for additional security but also TOOK AWAY some of the compound's security ... and still left them there to die in the attack on 9/11/12 still to come.
'Nothing came of the investigations...Hillary and Barry made no mistakes, did nothing wrong.'
OH, STFU!
4 Americans are dead because they CHOSE not to save them.
No. They didn't know ahead of time - there wasn't any actionable intelligence. It's like the claims that Bush could have prevented 9/11. There were multiple western embassies still there prior to the attack and remaining there after the attack.
Even if you were right, which you are NOT, if Hillary and Barry / the Obama administration's Intel did not know about a Middle East-wide highly coordinated attack on the anniversary of 9/11 (other countries cited the pending attack as part of the reason they were pulling out), then they still F*-ED UP / FAILED MASSIVELY!
Even if they did not know a 3rd attack was not coming, after the 2nd attack Ambassador Stephens warned they could not survive a 3rd...
..
And instead of pulling them out Hillary denied another request and took away some of their existing security...AGAIN, LEAVING THEM TO DIE!
How could she deny something she was never made aware of? Nuff said.If Hillary Clinton's daughter would have been in Benghazi would she have left her there after 2 terrorist attacks ... Would she have denied her daughter's request for more security ... Would she have taken away some of her security and left her there there?
HELL NO!
'Nuff said.
Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests. She didn’t refuse anything. Your own investigations cleared her. You do realize that don’t you?Dude, Hillary had 3 chances to pull them out.
- She CHOSE not to.
She was asked for additional security 50+ times
- She rejected every request
After the 2nd attack, that left a 4-foot hole in the wall, she TOOK AWAY security
Are we supposed to believe these 2 attacks were ALSO protests over videos?
SHE was responsible for protecting those Americans....she failed...they were murdered.
The security she hired to protect them included:
1. An AL QAEDA-ASSOCIATED MILITIA
2. A security company that never worked in a hostile area and never carried guns before
WTF?
Save you BS for your fellow snowflakes, C.
BULLSHIT!Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests.
She was not the Secretary of Defense.BULLSHIT!Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests.
Under oath before Congress she LAUGHED then testified she thought those requests were a joke, part of his sense of humor.
1. She knew.
2. Who the F* laughs at a dead man's more than 50 pleas for help?
Even if she had not known, SHE was the Secretary of State. SHE was responsible for their protection. SHE FAILED.
SHE was the Secretary of Defense... She had no clue what was going on in HER agency? About more than to requests for additional security at a compound attacked by terrorists twice already...and all those requests had been denied?
This is still a massive fail on HER part for not knowing.
You lie and have the lamest damn excuses and defenses...
She was never 'cleared" because none of the investigations were ever a 'criminal' investigation, dumb ass. It was Fact-Finding'.Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests. She didn’t refuse anything. Your own investigations cleared her. You do realize that don’t you?Dude, Hillary had 3 chances to pull them out.
- She CHOSE not to.
She was asked for additional security 50+ times
- She rejected every request
After the 2nd attack, that left a 4-foot hole in the wall, she TOOK AWAY security
Are we supposed to believe these 2 attacks were ALSO protests over videos?
SHE was responsible for protecting those Americans....she failed...they were murdered.
The security she hired to protect them included:
1. An AL QAEDA-ASSOCIATED MILITIA
2. A security company that never worked in a hostile area and never carried guns before
WTF?
Save you BS for your fellow snowflakes, C.
Ya, doofus, because there were no crimes committed. If the fact finding doesn’t find any evidence of crimes there is not going to be a criminal investigation.She was never 'cleared" because none of the investigations were ever a 'criminal' investigation, dumb ass. It was Fact-Finding'.Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests. She didn’t refuse anything. Your own investigations cleared her. You do realize that don’t you?Dude, Hillary had 3 chances to pull them out.
- She CHOSE not to.
She was asked for additional security 50+ times
- She rejected every request
After the 2nd attack, that left a 4-foot hole in the wall, she TOOK AWAY security
Are we supposed to believe these 2 attacks were ALSO protests over videos?
SHE was responsible for protecting those Americans....she failed...they were murdered.
The security she hired to protect them included:
1. An AL QAEDA-ASSOCIATED MILITIA
2. A security company that never worked in a hostile area and never carried guns before
WTF?
Save you BS for your fellow snowflakes, C.
Sect of state.She was not the Secretary of Defense.BULLSHIT!Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests.
Under oath before Congress she LAUGHED then testified she thought those requests were a joke, part of his sense of humor.
1. She knew.
2. Who the F* laughs at a dead man's more than 50 pleas for help?
Even if she had not known, SHE was the Secretary of State. SHE was responsible for their protection. SHE FAILED.
SHE was the Secretary of Defense... She had no clue what was going on in HER agency? About more than to requests for additional security at a compound attacked by terrorists twice already...and all those requests had been denied?
This is still a massive fail on HER part for not knowing.
You lie and have the lamest damn excuses and defenses...
Again...I go by the investigation’s conclusions. Not some incoherent conspiracy theorist’s partisan rantings.
A 'FACT FINDING investigation' as these were intended to find the .ca rd so this disaster could be prevented in the future ... And you keep lying about how they 'found nothing's, and I gave debunked that lie repeatedly.Ya, doofus, because there were no crimes committed. If the fact finding doesn’t find any evidence of crimes there is not going to be a criminal investigation.
Point out the parts of the investigation results that support your claim then. I will wait.A 'FACT FINDING investigation' as these were intended to find the .ca rd so this disaster could be prevented in the future ... And you keep lying about how they 'found nothing's, and I gave debunked that lie repeatedly.Ya, doofus, because there were no crimes committed. If the fact finding doesn’t find any evidence of crimes there is not going to be a criminal investigation.
Hillary is a self-serving, lying, national security-compromising POS.
What crafted reports? These included Republican led inquiries LOOKING for political ammo to use against her. But they didn’t come up with anything.Sect of state.She was not the Secretary of Defense.BULLSHIT!Dude. There is no evidence she ever saw those requests.
Under oath before Congress she LAUGHED then testified she thought those requests were a joke, part of his sense of humor.
1. She knew.
2. Who the F* laughs at a dead man's more than 50 pleas for help?
Even if she had not known, SHE was the Secretary of State. SHE was responsible for their protection. SHE FAILED.
SHE was the Secretary of Defense... She had no clue what was going on in HER agency? About more than to requests for additional security at a compound attacked by terrorists twice already...and all those requests had been denied?
This is still a massive fail on HER part for not knowing.
You lie and have the lamest damn excuses and defenses...
Again...I go by the investigation’s conclusions. Not some incoherent conspiracy theorist’s partisan rantings.
You go by crafted reports designed to protect Hillary and Barry.
You keep avoiding the fact that she had e opportunities to pull them out after 2 terrorist attacks and instead left them there to die....
You just claimed she did not know about the requests, & I just proved she did based on the fact that she testified she thought those requests were a joke, part of his sense of humor.
YOU even know the facts, but you keep lying and defending her sorry ass.
Go read the transcripts again of Hillary's testimony, bit@h.Point out the parts of the investigation results that support your claim then. I will wait.A 'FACT FINDING investigation' as these were intended to find the .ca rd so this disaster could be prevented in the future ... And you keep lying about how they 'found nothing's, and I gave debunked that lie repeatedly.Ya, doofus, because there were no crimes committed. If the fact finding doesn’t find any evidence of crimes there is not going to be a criminal investigation.
Hillary is a self-serving, lying, national security-compromising POS.
Because 4 Americans were abandoned to die in Benghazi.
