Discussion in 'Race Relations/Racism' started by UptoDate, Dec 2, 2008.
Professor of Hate? :: Inside Higher Ed :: Higher Education's Source for News, Views and Jobs
More at link.
It pays to work out where someone's coming from, particularly when they're writing outside their area of academic expertise. Knowing this bloke's form is essential to get the context of his views in this article. I'll be sure to read his article carefully and then come back with a view or two.
That would put you in a league over most. In our society (and yours -- Google "Andrew Fraser"), "racist" is the new "communist" -- anyone so "blacklisted" doesn't get a fair hearing, only expulsion!
Interesting article. For me, ANYTHING a Jew says or does should be eyed carefully, skeptically. That's not to say I reject everything they say -- they are sometimes pretty bold, intellectually. But as Prof. MacDonald has shown, they have a strong tendency to advance views that end up benefitting them. Neoconservatism is a powerful example.
Are we chumming the waters for Jews, this evening, boys?
Aren't there any windows you can break in the neighborhood or something?
You mean "overwhelming" tendecy!!!
You are right!
Where is DavidS and Jillian???
I know the story with Andrew Fraser, it's apparently settled now.
Neoconservatism was more about Leo Strauss than Jews.
In my opinion, if you give someone like Torquemada (Chief inquisitor of the Spanish Inquisition) or even just Luther the control over a industrialized Germany you will end up with a Holocaust.
Christians do not need Darwinism to start killing Jews.
Hitler was not that special, History is full of genocidial nutcases, but the average genocidial nutcase in history did not have the technology to conduct a holocaust.
Separate names with a comma.