Being Liberal Makes You a Fascist

You can NOT have a liberal/socialist/populist government without the use of FORCE.

It just can't be done.

Impossible.

That is why every populist revolution in the History of Man has turned from being a popular/populist movement into a tyrannical, dictatorial, murdering, imprisoning blood-fest.

Every one of them. Every time.

Conservatives and , to a lesser extent, Republicans know this. We eschew populism because we have a brain. We know what happens when populist leaders like Fidel, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, 'Ugo, Pol Pot, Uncle Ho and every other murdering scumbag leftist in the history of this world takes power.

It isn't so much that we object to the goals -- Egalitarianism isn't really all that bad. Neither is a little bit of wealth redistribution.

Health Care for all is a laudable goal and so is ending poverty.

But here's the rub..... It never stops there.

There are laws that have to be passed to make these things possible.

And Laws are useless without enforcement.

Look at that word for a second or two.

Tell me what you see. What do you see in the word 'enforcement' that libturds are too stupid to understand?

I'll tell you, it is enFORCEment.

You have to enFORCE laws to make them work. Without the use of force (try not paying your taxes and see what happens) none of it works.


Conservatives and most Republicans don't want the government using force on its citizens any more than absolutely necessary.

dimocrap scum want goobermint to FORCE us to do their bidding. To FORCE us to eat they way they want. To FORCE us to think the way they want (ask Donald Sterling or the Dolphins Don Jones) to FORCE us to give up our hard-earned money. To FORCE us to change our morals. To FORCE......

You get the picture.

To dimocrap scum, the goobermint is everything. Know why?

Simple, because they and only they can use FORCE of law to get their way.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth, people.

The only thing that separates them from Hitler, Stalin, Mao, etc is that they don't have control of the Army.

That is NOT a point in rhetoric. THAT is a fact.

It is why the hate the Military. Because they know that the United States Military would swat them like a troublesome bug if they tried to do what they really want to do -- Gulags, re-education camps, etc.

That will be the next major battle we wage. To keep dimocrap scum from taking over the Military.

They're trying. Hard. really hard.

And they're making some inroads.

Be aware, people. I'm not kidding when I call dimocraps the scum of the earth.

They're worse than that.




you seem awful emotional about having to live by rule of law. :rolleyes:

Laws passed by congress or judicial fiat?



we live by rule of law in a constitutional republic...enforcing laws is not fascist.

when congress passes a law which might not pass constitutional muster, it stands to be judicially challenged...

ensuring legislation is not unconstitutional is kind of important if you don't like fascism. :lol:
 
Last edited:
^^^ Still doesn't know the definition of Fascist. :lol:




Still running from the question.
There is no question. Just another fact-free cut and paste from the human Xerox machine.




I'm certain that my point has been proven. As an good fascist, 'reliable Democrat voter,' you find it impossible to criticize Reid and the indefensible attempts to silence any opposing voice.

So...what you evince is a puerile changing of the subject.



Or.....grow a pair and take a stance on the topic.
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Sure thing. The Deportation President is just cranky, that's all.
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves



no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves



no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders



correction... there was one president who had zero instances of executive orders.


William Henry Harrison Total 0
 
Last edited:
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves



no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders

not even talking about executive orders genius; talking about abuse of power through federal agencies

bush was elected twice too
 
It's the actions that have spoken.

Deny the names all you might like but chanting party mantras will not make the acts of what should be called treason magically never have happened.

You cannot also blame living people today for whatever sins were committed by people long dead,

so once again the OP and you engage in an exercise of idiotic futility.




The real idiotic futility is offering you an education.

Am I responsible for the beliefs of Woodrow Wilson?
 
The fact is the greatest liberal of the Wilson era was Robert LaFollette, who opposed WWI, and much of the other crap the author of this thread is trying to pass off as liberalism.



So glad you brought up Republican LaFollette.....who hated the racist Democrats!


While LaFollette was not at home with the businessman-politician that was coming to dominate the Republican Party, he could not abide the Democrats, whose stronghold was the South, where they now engaged in depriving black citizens of the right to vote.

African-Americans would have progressed beyond the new immigrants, LaFollette declared, if they “had been fairly treated, if they had received kindly recognition, if they had been given the opportunity to make homes for themselves, if their labor had been properly rewarded.”
David P. Thelen, “Robert LaFollette and the Insurgent Spirit,” p. 10-11.



Once again the evil, atavistic history of the Democrat Party is revealed!



LaFollette formed the Progressive Party in 1924.....well after Wilson's presidency.

So you admit that the real liberalism of Progressive Era was better personified by LaFollette than Wilson.

So why do you keep trying to portray progressive era liberals as fascists?

Because you cherish your title as the only stupid Asian in America?

lolol
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves



no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders

not even talking about executive orders genius; talking about abuse of power through federal agencies

bush was elected twice too



yes he was. so?

abuse of power is bad no matter who does it, but human nature tends to get in the way of all things perfect and ideal, which is why our system of government, by the people for the people, is set up with checks and balances whereby alleged abuses can be properly challenged and LEGALLY eradicated.
 
Being a liberal today (there are no "progressives" that movement died out in 1920's) means you are a 1960's Weather Underground communist.

This from the poster who elsewhere just declared that we should end ALL poverty programs in this country -

in other words, one of the better representatives of modern day conservatism.
 
the Left isnt enforcing laws; certainly not this Administration. this one is NOT enforcing them; like immigration laws for example

they are making "law" out of FIAT decrees by government agencies

libs are losers who lie to themselves



no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders

A lot of presidents have used EO, no doubt. Most presidents haven't used them at the level of circumventing congress on major legislative actions as obama has, IMHO.
Immigration and the 30+ changes to the ACA are major. Not like getting a position nominee pushed through during a break.
 
no doubt our current president has employed the use of executive orders which many citizens disagree with, however the man was elected twice...

Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions?
Is Obama overstepping his bounds with executive actions? - CBS News



fact is, there's never been a president who hasn't exerted his executive power to some degree...

Executive Orders

not even talking about executive orders genius; talking about abuse of power through federal agencies

bush was elected twice too



yes he was. so?

abuse of power is bad no matter who does it, but human nature tends to get in the way of all things perfect and ideal, which is why our system of government, by the people for the people, is set up with checks and balances whereby alleged abuses can be properly challenged and LEGALLY eradicated.

yawn; not so. this type of abuse of power is very hard to legally challenge; since courts have given presidents great leeway in how they govern

obama is abusing his power through federal agencies; refusing to enforce immigration laws on the books already; and making it MUCH harder on energy producers; particularly coal
 
I thought the rightwing storyline was that being Liberal made you a Socialist

Now you say it makes you a Fascist

Other than the fact the Conservatives do not know the meaning of either one......How can you be both?
 

Forum List

Back
Top