- Dec 6, 2009
- 77,845
- 4,176
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #21
It is a fallacious claim. As we all very well know, palistanians don't want a state, otherwise Clinton and Bush might have had one by now (in Washington, DC, preferably). A palistanian remarkable lack of interest in having a state is easily explainable by the fact that running a state is not running terroristania, - one has to, actually, think about employment, roads, communication and garbage disposal, and this is not fun, compared to palistanian street marching, rocket shooting, talking drivel, lying like a pornstar, demanding aid and, generally, occupying and oppressing everybody around the globe with their occupational occupation.maybe Palestine can succeed if isreal cuts off another water supply or militarily restricts another venue of transportation!Are we admitting palistan is a failed state yet?
one has to, actually, think about employment, roads, communication and garbage disposal,
They had all that before Israel stole or destroyed it.
Before Israel, Palestine was a peaceful and prosperous country.
Last edited: