Be cool to divide the country

By separation of the country I mean totally. We have our own Congress and they have theirs. We would not work together on anything. Trade? That can be ironed out, but what we need are two completely separate governments, each having their own legislative and judicial branch, and each having their own Constitution which I would suspect the conservatives would keep the one we have now with some minor changes.
I understood that. All industry work farming will be conservative Republican. Democrats will have all the lawyers, solar panels and illegal aliens.

Shortly after we divide democrats will start war, forgetting the war machine is republican. War over money to finance the democrats social utopia.
 
Guess am just old. Believe in the UNITED states of America. And anything less than that is anti America.

That's the point of separation. We are no longer united. The left wants to turn us into a Socialist/ Communist government dependent shithole, and the Republicans want us free from government to pursue our own dreams. Why do you suppose they are letting in all these third world immigrants? Because that would give us a single-party government forever.

I think it's more American to try and save half a country instead of risking losing the entire thing. Anybody that wishes to lose the entire country are the ones that are anti-American.
 
I understood that. All industry work farming will be conservative Republican. Democrats will have all the lawyers, solar panels and illegal aliens.

Shortly after we divide democrats will start war, forgetting the war machine is republican. War over money to finance the democrats social utopia.

There may be a war but if there is one, it would be because they are jumping the border like the illegals are now to take advantage of everything we created. They are already doing that with our nice neighborhoods now.


After all, how long can a country last when nobody is permitted a firearm, half or more of the people don't work and depend on the government, taxing their industries at 90% like they talk about before the Reagan years. No police and giving criminals a slap on the hand if that, all drugs legal drugs including fentanyl, open borders (if they get the west side of the country) flooding their schools and what few jobs they have left, depending on electricity for all their power needs. A country couldn't last a year with all Democrat policies. Therefore we would need extensive efforts to keep them out of our country.
 
Dude, stop trying to sneak the east side on we westerners :abgg2q.jpg:

If we have a vote you may be right though. The left hit California first and foremost, go figure with Silicon Valley, gee what a surprise. Well those fuckers escaped the hive in huge numbers turning other western states so blue.

If we take the East that's bad news for the West coast, they can't even be expected to manage their forests.

East coast and Alaska isn't the worst thing, but imagine the mop up we'd have to do, such as Chicago, all built by the left. And to me NY asks for too much trouble.

Yes but it could be done. If we ended up with the west, think how long it would take us to get rid of the illegals alone. And we'd still have problems keeping them out no matter what we do. California is the most populated state in the union, and moving up the coast you have liberal Oregon and Washington state. So our dilemma would be choosing between the ultra liberal NE area and the ultra liberal west coast. Hard decision, but taking out garbage was never a fun task.
 
Sorry man, we're doing this. The left fucked up too deeply and their voters blindly condone it.
 
Are you utterly ignorant of history? Civil wars are bloody house by house affairs. Rwanda ring a bell? Bosnia? Ukraine right now?

As I stated, it would have to be an agreement on both sides. But as we also know, liberal policies could never allow a country to survive more than a year or so. In other words we Republicans would at least look into the idea, but liberals would fight tooth and nail to make sure we couldn't separate because they can't survive without us.
 
They did were I live, in rhode island. Further, they never ever approached $3 let alone push $4.

Energy under democrats control is expensive and will get much more expensive.
If you say so....

Updated: Apr 24, 2018 / 03:40 AM EDT

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI/AP) — The price of gas in Rhode Island has skyrocketed over the past few weeks, and local experts say it may continue to rise.

AAA Northeast said its weekly survey found self-serve regular selling for an average of $2.75 per gallon in Rhode Island, up 10 cents from the previous week.

“It’s quite frightening, the gas prices,” Martha Habib of Providence said. “I’ve never seen it so high in a long time.”


AAA said prices are now at a level that hasn’t been seen since the summer of 2015.

“Seems like every day they go up like three or four cents,” Paul Adams of Providence said.

The average price of gasoline in Rhode Island is 40 cents higher than it was one year ago. AAA found gas selling for as low as $2.62 per gallon and as high as $2.99.

AAA said demand is up and inventories of oil and gasoline are down. They expect prices to continue rising.
 
You simply cant shut down a pipeline that never pumped a drop of oil. The Keystone pipeline was not shut down because the XL extension construction was cancelled. The Keystone pipeline is still pumping oil into the US every single day.

If that was the case why did he shut it down, and I mean shutdown the construction of it?

Yes, that oil will still reach it's destination, but through more environmentally dangerous trains. You know, those trains Soros owns? Plus it put a lot of people out of work and put fear into the oil market.
 

And given the booming economy it was quite a feat. However Trump has always been pro US energy, and that's why the prices remained low. We were the worlds largest exporter of energy. Under GW and DumBama the economy wasn't nearly as good and we went over $4.00 a gallon. In fact because of the low prices, President Trump bought a shit load of gasoline for our national reserves, and Dementia wasted it to try and look good. It did nothing for the price of gasoline,but what does that matter, right?

It was a campaign promise and the approval was granted by an EO because the Trumpybear couldn't or wouldn't make any deals to pass any legislation.

I never said he didn't have the right to stop it, I said he did stop it. Trump's inability tells you that Dementia's team mates are also anti-energy so there was no way he could get anything done on that level. Trump tried to get along with them the best he could and their response was always......

Pelosi-1.jpeg
 
Yes, that oil will still reach it's destination, but through more environmentally dangerous trains. You know, those trains Soros owns?
How many more time are they going to use the "Dangerous Trains of Soros" line? Isn't that what they said about the first Keystone Pipeline? I guess there were no guarantees then or now that the trains wont be used to push more of their bitumen slurry down south regardless of the danger.....
And given the booming economy it was quite a feat. and that's why the prices remained low. We were the worlds largest exporter of energy
That economy had been steadily improving since 2010.
 

Forum List

Back
Top