BBC is instructed to provide UNBIASED coverage of "climate change" coverage

Discussion in 'Environment' started by westwall, Oct 13, 2010.

  1. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    47,305
    Thanks Received:
    9,605
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +28,335
    In another blow to the AGW alarmists the BBC has been instructed to provide impartial coverage of climate change articles. It will be interesting to see how this impacts US media coverage as well.

    BBC told to ensure balance on climate change - Telegraph
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Revere
    Offline

    Revere BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,427
    Thanks Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Watching you in my profile page
    Ratings:
    +417
    You mean the coverage to date was not unbiased?
     
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    52,536
    Thanks Received:
    6,246
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +14,189
    What a fucking dingbat article. A reporter cannot be unbiased in reporting on global warming because he has a wind turbine in his garden. You fellows are really reaching. Especially since the day to day data is really showing how fast the change is proceeding.
     
  4. CrusaderFrank
    Online

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    87,105
    Thanks Received:
    15,945
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +45,962
    It's settled science SHUT THE FUCK UP! It's not like gravity or quantum physics!

    We have Consensus!
     
  5. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    47,305
    Thanks Received:
    9,605
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +28,335



    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: That is hilarious!
     
  6. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    52,536
    Thanks Received:
    6,246
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +14,189
    Of course, if one really wants to understand what is happening, you don't listen to BBC, or any other news outlet. You read Science, Nature, and the peer reviewed geological journals. One place one can see what real scientists dealing with this very subject are looking at is lectures at their conventions.



    2009 AGU Fall Meeting: Featured Lectures
     
  7. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    52,536
    Thanks Received:
    6,246
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +14,189
    Of course it is hilarious. You have nothing else to state. You have been beaten on every point. The Royal Society statement was the opposite of what you were claiming, and the scientists are giving us evidence daily that the warming is real and that we are the primary cause.
     
  8. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    47,305
    Thanks Received:
    9,605
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +28,335



    The only person you are "beating" is yourself in the mirror clown. You are starting to lose touch with reality. I am sorry to see you fall apart as your religion does likewise, but hey get used to it....maybe the asylums aren't so bad after all.
     

Share This Page