BBC is instructed to provide UNBIASED coverage of "climate change" coverage

What a fucking dingbat article. A reporter cannot be unbiased in reporting on global warming because he has a wind turbine in his garden. You fellows are really reaching. Especially since the day to day data is really showing how fast the change is proceeding.
 
It's settled science SHUT THE FUCK UP! It's not like gravity or quantum physics!

We have Consensus!
 
What a fucking dingbat article. A reporter cannot be unbiased in reporting on global warming because he has a wind turbine in his garden. You fellows are really reaching. Especially since the day to day data is really showing how fast the change is proceeding.




:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: That is hilarious!
 
Of course, if one really wants to understand what is happening, you don't listen to BBC, or any other news outlet. You read Science, Nature, and the peer reviewed geological journals. One place one can see what real scientists dealing with this very subject are looking at is lectures at their conventions.



2009 AGU Fall Meeting: Featured Lectures
 
Of course it is hilarious. You have nothing else to state. You have been beaten on every point. The Royal Society statement was the opposite of what you were claiming, and the scientists are giving us evidence daily that the warming is real and that we are the primary cause.
 
Of course it is hilarious. You have nothing else to state. You have been beaten on every point. The Royal Society statement was the opposite of what you were claiming, and the scientists are giving us evidence daily that the warming is real and that we are the primary cause.




The only person you are "beating" is yourself in the mirror clown. You are starting to lose touch with reality. I am sorry to see you fall apart as your religion does likewise, but hey get used to it....maybe the asylums aren't so bad after all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top