Renowned Physicist Responds to American Physical Society's Response

Discussion in 'Environment' started by IanC, Oct 13, 2010.

  1. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,200
    Thanks Received:
    1,071
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,448
    read the whole thing at APS responds! – Deconstructing the APS response to Dr. Hal Lewis resignation | Watts Up With That?
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2010
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,639
    Thanks Received:
    5,431
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,423
    Piffle.

    And the whole of the Society, and the other Scientific Societies will pay zero attention to the silly response to the APS statement. For it is similiar to all of the other Scientific Societies statements. But we are supposed to listen to non-experts with a political axe to grind.

    The Royal Society statement came out with all kinds of fanfare about how it was going to demolish AGW, and then when read, only reinforces what has been said in prior statements.
     
  3. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    41,047
    Thanks Received:
    7,993
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,820



    "Experts" who have to resort to manipulating data are not experts fool. That's why you are going to see many , many more societies revolt against the AGW "consensus".
     
  4. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,639
    Thanks Received:
    5,431
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,423
    Really? Going to hold you to that prediction, dumbass. I predict they will revolt in exactly the same manner as the Royal Society, and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
     
  5. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,639
    Thanks Received:
    5,431
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,423
  6. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,639
    Thanks Received:
    5,431
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,423
    LOL. Lindzen, the first name on the list. A witness for the tobacco companies on how good tobacco is for you.

    And published, of course, in the blog of an undegreed ex-TV weatherman who has been caught in innumerable lies.
     
  7. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    41,047
    Thanks Received:
    7,993
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,820
    Yes that is a prediction olfraud. Looks like I stung you again:lol::lol::lol: I can allways tell when it hurts, you post and post and post trying to bury your agony under a pile of drivel.
     

Share This Page