Barr to Nadler: ‘I’m NOT talking to your staff attorneys’ regarding Mueller redactions

[koshergrl]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

He most certainly can decline to be a performer in Fat Jerry's Circus.

Mueller’s follow-up letter of complaint did not allege that Barr lied or that he had deliberately misled anyone.

& nadler can slap a contempt of congress charge on him if he refuses the subpoena that will be delivered to biily boy.

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

and thus means exactly nothing.
As we learned during the Obamanation years.

 

[playtime]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

 

[playtime]

& nadler can slap a contempt of congress charge on him if he refuses the subpoena that will be delivered to biily boy.

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

Look up 2 USC sec. 192.

a judge is necessary only if they go for a civil suit, otherwise they have 'inherent contempt power'

https://constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/WhenCongressComesCalling.pdf'

Congresses contempt power is only enforceable by Barr's justice Department.

LOL.

wrong.

 

[EGR one]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

You should actually try to understand the Constitution and the laws before you get up on your high horse. There is nothing in the Constitution or the laws that requires the executive branch to participate in a congressional circus act.

 

[koshergrl]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

You should actually try to understand the Constitution and the laws before you get up on your high horse. There is nothing in the Constitution or the laws that requires the executive branch to participate in a congressional circus act.

They're too lazy and stupid to actually study or research any of the issues they like to gibber about.

Our enemies pour shit into their gullets, and they just automatically spew it back. It's all they're trained to do.

 

[playtime]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

You should actually try to understand the Constitution and the laws before you get up on your high horse. There is nothing in the Constitution or the laws that requires the executive branch to participate in a congressional circus act.

high horse? shirley you jest. no man is above the law... why would you want one to be? besides, just ask AG john mitchell. oh wait, he's dead; but still went to prison.

 

[Zorro!]

& nadler can slap a contempt of congress charge on him if he refuses the subpoena that will be delivered to biily boy.

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

Look up 2 USC sec. 192.

a judge is necessary only if they go for a civil suit, otherwise they have 'inherent contempt power'

https://constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/WhenCongressComesCalling.pdf'

Congresses contempt power is only enforceable by Barr's justice Department.

Congress' inherent power to impeach is fully independent of the DOJ, which is part of the Executive Branch.

The Executive Branch powers are outlined in Article 2.

The Legislative Branch powers are described in Article 1.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution grants to the House of Representatives "the sole power of impeachment".

Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 grants to the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments".

In considering articles of impeachment, the House is obligated to base any charges on the constitutional standards specified in Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

 

[skookerasbil]

Barr has waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much on his plate now to be bothered by these weenies in Congress. The guy is going to be busy preparing criminal referrals over the next several weeks......and it wont be Trump people btw!!

 

[Zorro!]

Barr has waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much on his plate now to be bothered by these weenies in Congress. The guy is going to be busy preparing criminal referrals over the next several weeks......and it wont be Trump people btw!!

Yup!

Barr Hearing a Cheap Stunt to Revive Flagging Harris, Booker, and Klobuchar Campaigns.

 

[skookerasbil]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

Exactly right s0n........which is why Barr gave the hi sign to congress to prepare criminal proceedings against the Obama DOJ and Aunt Hilda's people!! Expect the name Podesta to be in the news........ALOT......over the next few months. Yuk....yuk........this is about to get to be a hoot. But not if you're a progressive guy!!

DUMS out there are too st00pid to get that the whole post Barr hysterics was about slandering the guy because they know what is coming!!!

 

[playtime]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

Exactly right s0n........which is why Barr gave the hi sign to congress to prepare criminal proceedings against the Obama DOJ and Aunt Hilda's people!! Expect the name Podesta to be in the news........ALOT......over the next few months. Yuk....yuk........this is about to get to be a hoot. But not if you're a progressive guy!!

DUMS out there are too st00pid to get that the whole post Barr hysterics was about slandering the guy because they know what is coming!!!

lol....

 

[skookerasbil]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Apparently, he does.

congress isn't powerless no matter how trump wants to play this. you think going against the constitution is wise? you are willing to give up & let the constitution die? of course you do because you are loyal to a man baby. but this nation is a nation of laws, not men.

Exactly right s0n........which is why Barr gave the hi sign to congress to prepare criminal proceedings against the Obama DOJ and Aunt Hilda's people!! Expect the name Podesta to be in the news........ALOT......over the next few months. Yuk....yuk........this is about to get to be a hoot. But not if you're a progressive guy!!

DUMS out there are too st00pid to get that the whole post Barr hysterics was about slandering the guy because they know what is coming!!!

lol....

Just sayin' s0n........take a gander over to REALCLEAR today.........moving forward, being a DUM is going to suck the big one.

 

[Zorro!]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

Fat Jerry is trying to pull a fast one.

In over 206 years of the House Judiciary Committee, staffers have never questioned a witness, let alone the US Attorney General, in an oversight hearing.

These clowns fool no one.

 

[Darkwind]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

I wonder if you even realize that Barr was there voluntarily as a show of transparency and intergovernmental courtesy?

Probably not.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! what are you talking about? barr didn't show up for the house cause he's scared. an AG is afraid to be questioned by <GASP> lawyers!!!

He didn't show up because he doesn't have to. He was there as a courtesy only. I'm not sure what you think he is scared of. He's has more than manhandled the Democrats thus far.

 

[Darkwind]

& nadler can slap a contempt of congress charge on him if he refuses the subpoena that will be delivered to biily boy.

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

Look up 2 USC sec. 192.

a judge is necessary only if they go for a civil suit, otherwise they have 'inherent contempt power'

https://constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/WhenCongressComesCalling.pdf'

Congresses contempt power is only enforceable by Barr's justice Department.

Its also only enforceable if they issue a subpoena.

Then there is the court fight on the executive privilege which should take until 2030.

 

[Zorro!]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

I wonder if you even realize that Barr was there voluntarily as a show of transparency and intergovernmental courtesy?

Probably not.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! what are you talking about? barr didn't show up for the house cause he's scared. an AG is afraid to be questioned by <GASP> lawyers!!!

He didn't show up because he doesn't have to. He was there as a courtesy only. I'm not sure what you think he is scared of. He's has more than manhandled the Democrats thus far.

In over 206 years of the House Judiciary Committee, staffers have never questioned a witness, let alone the US Attorney General, in an oversight hearing.

Fat Jerry can stuff it.

 

[toomuchtime_]

barr doesn't get to dictate how nadler wants to conduct biz'nez.

As it concerns Barr's testimony, he does.

 

[Darkwind]

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

Look up 2 USC sec. 192.

a judge is necessary only if they go for a civil suit, otherwise they have 'inherent contempt power'

https://constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/WhenCongressComesCalling.pdf'

Congresses contempt power is only enforceable by Barr's justice Department.

Congress' inherent power to impeach is fully independent of the DOJ, which is part of the Executive Branch.

The Executive Branch powers are outlined in Article 2.

The Legislative Branch powers are described in Article 1.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution grants to the House of Representatives "the sole power of impeachment".

Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 grants to the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments".

In considering articles of impeachment, the House is obligated to base any charges on the constitutional standards specified in Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

So, you see the Senate convicting Barr and removing him from office?

 

[Zorro!]

Just as soon as Nadler gets a judge to hold Barr in contempt.

Contempt of Congress doesn't require a judge, just a majority in the House, which Democrats have.

Look up 2 USC sec. 192.

a judge is necessary only if they go for a civil suit, otherwise they have 'inherent contempt power'

https://constitutionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/WhenCongressComesCalling.pdf'

Congresses contempt power is only enforceable by Barr's justice Department.

Its also only enforceable if they issue a subpoena...

Eric "The With" Holder and other Obama Administration officials routinely ignored Congressional Subpoenas.

...Then there is the court fight on the executive privilege which should take until 2030.

The Court isn't going to get involved in pissing match between two fellow branches. If it was a court case they would, but this is just Fat Jerry's committee.

 

[007]

House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler...

Every time I hear that buffoons name I think of "STIFLER" from the movie American Pie... only Stifler was a more cool. "Jerry NADS"... somebody ought kick that fucker in the NADS. Maybe it would jar his pea brain.

Then comes Adam ScHITt... what a couple of dumbass leftist sons a bitchin' HACKS.