- Thread starter
- #61
WRONG....WAIT FOR THE SENATE!And the Attorney General DISAGREES AS DOES DUNHAM....both have subpoena power THAT THE IG didn't and was stonewalled by the FBI REFUDING to give him dicumentsThe FISA renewals werent the origins, it was Papadoplous bragging.This dripps of political bias and a Coup D'etat.FISA warrant and renewals had "significant inaccuracies and omissions"
Horowitz's team of investigators found "significant inaccuracies and omissions in each of the four applications — seven in the first FISA applications and a total of 17 by the final renewal." As a result of these 17 inaccuracies and omissions, Horowitz wrote that relevant information was not shared with and considered by decisionmakers at the Justice Department and the national security court.
All of the applications also left out information the FBI obtained from another government agency about its previous relationship with Page.
Horowitz concluded that members of the FBI's team investigating ties between Russia and the Trump campaign "failed to meet the basic obligation that the Carter Page FISA applications were "scrupulously accurate."
Justice Department watchdog releases report on origins of Russia investigation
This article your replying to says there were procedural errors but overall no "political bias" by the FBI.
At the end of the day, we just have a disagreement. Given Barr’s belief that Trump is a god among men (figuratively obviously) I’m not surprised he doesn’t find the evidence warrants the investigation.
It’s all just a matter of opinion. Lots of Monday morning quarterbacks.