manu1959
Left Coast Isolationist
this movie got made so hollywood can push the gay marraige gig and get it on prime time tv at the oscars....it will win every award....so says my brother the agent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Kagom said:I really have no opinion of this movie until I see it. It appeals to me emotionally because it involves gay people. It also appeals to me on an artistic level because it has been passed off as artistically tasteful and independant.
I'm aware. I'm still to be appealed on an emotional factor because two men have some form of love. Is that better worded?manu1959 said:they are bi
Well, your brother was right.... BBM won 4 golden globes. Well, a lot of us were right when we predicted that Hollywood just fell over itself giving awards to this nonsense (but then that's like predicting that Christmas is going to fall on December 25th of any given year). The movie is just gay pornography that not only endorses homosexuality but adultery, too. (A Hollywood movie that endorses adultery, who'd ever have thunk it?).manu1959 said:this movie got made so hollywood can push the gay marraige gig and get it on prime time tv at the oscars....it will win every award....so says my brother the agent
Men can love each other without having sex together, or desiring to do so.Kagom said:I'm aware. I'm still to be appealed on an emotional factor because two men have some form of love. Is that better worded?
But the thing is, what if they want to express that love in one of the more deeper forms? I'm not talking platonic love, I'm talking about intimate love that is expressed in mainstream heterosexual couples as well as homosexual couples.mom4 said:Men can love each other without having sex together, or desiring to do so.
Kagom said:But the thing is, what if they want to express that love in one of the more deeper forms? I'm not talking platonic love, I'm talking about intimate love that is expressed in mainstream heterosexual couples as well as homosexual couples.
I'd say watch a sport game if they are into a sport. Play that sport even. Chill out at a movie they both have an interest in. Play games.GotZoom said:How would you suggest two males - who are strictly heterosexual - express their "deeper than platonic" love?
Without doing something that would be considered a homosexual act.
But we know that keeping your pants zipped up after a certain point (marriage) is pointless. So that's why the gay populace has pre-marital sex, because they can't marry each other. I know the most popular saying is "They can too marry, just not a person of the same sex." Well, what's the point for a gay person to marry and have sex with a person of a gender they're not attracted to? They're not expressing their love to a person they love.Superfluous Man said:Pope Pius had it right when he said (when talking about pre-marital sex,) "It's fine to be in love with someone. Just keep your pants zipped up."
Kagom said:But we know that keeping your pants zipped up after a certain point (marriage) is pointless. So that's why the gay populace has pre-marital sex, because they can't marry each other. I know the most popular saying is "They can too marry, just not a person of the same sex." Well, what's the point for a gay person to marry and have sex with a person of a gender they're not attracted to? They're not expressing their love to a person they love.
You should know that I'm not that dense. I'm saying on a generalization. Gay people have the same urges and wants as straight people. A majority have sex for pleasure. But I'm trying to cater to the ones who match their more conservative (what I mean here are those who have pre-marital sex to show their love and devotion) heterosexual counterparts.GotZoom said:You don't really believe this do you?
I would think the platonic love would be the "deeper" sentiment. Spiritual experiences are generally considered to be "deeper" than physical ones.Kagom said:But the thing is, what if they want to express that love in one of the more deeper forms? I'm not talking platonic love, I'm talking about intimate love that is expressed in mainstream heterosexual couples as well as homosexual couples.
My idea of a "deeper" love is along the lines of a spiritual and emotional connection in love.mom4 said:I would think the platonic love would be the "deeper" sentiment. Spiritual experiences are generally considered to be "deeper" than physical ones.
No need for sex, then.Kagom said:My idea of a "deeper" love is along the lines of a spiritual and emotional connection in love.
Maybe not so, but sex can be the best way for each other to show they do love each other better than just saying "I love you."mom4 said:No need for sex, then.
Do you limit your expression of love?mom4 said:No need for sex, then.
Kagom said:Maybe not so, but sex can be the best way for each other to show they do love each other better than just saying "I love you."