- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,177
- 9,172
- 2,030
This is how left-wing policy always ends - in complete and total failure.
The left works to ensure criminal activity is allowed to operate. That way they can use the “crisis” to erode liberties and assume the power and control that they deeply crave.Lenient school discipline policies implemented by the Obama administration allowed the Parkland, Florida, school shooter to maintain a clean record that allowed him to purchase the gun he used to kill 17 people, a report by RealClearInvestigations shows.
How Obama school discipline guidelines allowed school shooter to buy gun despite troubling past
It's funny that. Because you'd make the assumption that more conservative states would have less crime.
Like Louisiana. Quite right wing, loads of crime.
Or that more left wing states would be full of crime. But it doesn't work like that.
The Red states have crime problems in their Blue parts.
Why does the liberal culture produce so many criminals?
Why does the Democratic Party register criminals to vote?
I love how this happens. If something's not convenient, you go find something else.
Look here's the deal. There are two political parties in a country which should have at least 6. People end up voting for who they DON'T want in power.
The Republicans have shown they'll fuck over the poor.
Poorer people are more likely to get convicted of crimes. The rich go into govt to do their dastardly deeds, while the poor have to run the risk of actually getting arrested for their crimes.
Of course inner city areas are going to have a lot more crime. It makes sense. However Louisiana has a state govt which is mostly Republican and it's probably not doing its job properly which leads to higher crime in inner city areas.
People in poverty are more likely to vote Democrat.
Well, does it matter? Not really.
It's like this. A manager of mine, former 'Nam vet, could get free Coca-Cola from the tap all day at work. He had two girls to bring up as his wife had run off, he was on food stamps. He could get free Coca-Cola.
He bought Pepsi.
Why? Because he associated with the brand, it was the drink his sort of people buy. The Republicans and Democrats have done the same thing. They're not political parties, they're brands, and people vote for their favorite brand.
The brand that they think they are.
We provide $trillions$ to help the poor.
Being poor is not an excuse to commit crime.
That's nice. Now, I'm wondering why on Earth you said this. It doesn't seem to have anything much to do with what I actually said.
Now, maybe you want to go back, read what I actually wrote, think about it for a bit, then come up with a response that has something to do with what I said. Or you might just like to insult me.