MiddleClass
Moderate American
There is no one in the GOP presidential field who has sucked from the nipple of government than Bachmann. She and her husband have lived off tax payer money for decades.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are denying that progressivism is a political process to effect change, and that process can be left or right wing, and that my examples are not so, then you are the liar.
Move along, snuffy, you have been snuffled yet again.
Bachmann is in one week, the dirt starts surfacing. Palin has been putting up with this for 2 1/2 years. Still nothing. Bachmann is fixing to see the wrath of the liberal MSM and she will be looked at under a electron microscope. This is why Palin is going to come out shining because she has been vetted and has been vetted a second time and still, she has come out a winner. Romney has yet to be vetted like Palin. Same goes to Pawlenty but one thing is clear. There is something about a conservative woman that causes the media to go into search and destroy mode. Bachmann will be out of this race before you know it.
Michele Bachmann | Earmarks | Tea Party | The Daily Caller
Bachmann may also be plagued by her involvement in a controversial pardon. In 2007, Bachmann wrote a letter requesting a presidential pardon for a convicted drug-smuggler and money-launderer named Frank Vennes. Vennes was convicted of money laundering in 1988 and pleaded no contest to a cocaine and weapons charge. Making matters worse, he and his wife donated a total of $27,600 to Bachmanns 2006 and 2008 election.
Bachmanns penchant for earmarks dates back to her days in the Minnesota state Senate. Despite her reputation as a fiscal conservative, from 2001-2006, then-state Senator Bachmann proposed more than $60 million in earmarks, including a $710,000 Bond For Centerville Local Improvements Around Highway 14″ and a $40,000,000 Bond for Lino Lakes And Columbus Township Highway Interchanges.
More In Link.
Bachmann is in one week, the dirt starts surfacing. Palin has been putting up with this for 2 1/2 years. Still nothing. Bachmann is fixing to see the wrath of the liberal MSM and she will be looked at under a electron microscope. This is why Palin is going to come out shining because she has been vetted and has been vetted a second time and still, she has come out a winner. Romney has yet to be vetted like Palin. Same goes to Pawlenty but one thing is clear. There is something about a conservative woman that causes the media to go into search and destroy mode. Bachmann will be out of this race before you know it.
Michele Bachmann | Earmarks | Tea Party | The Daily Caller
Bachmann may also be plagued by her involvement in a controversial pardon. In 2007, Bachmann wrote a letter requesting a presidential pardon for a convicted drug-smuggler and money-launderer named Frank Vennes. Vennes was convicted of money laundering in 1988 and pleaded no contest to a cocaine and weapons charge. Making matters worse, he and his wife donated a total of $27,600 to Bachmann’s 2006 and 2008 election.
Bachmann’s penchant for earmarks dates back to her days in the Minnesota state Senate. Despite her reputation as a fiscal conservative, from 2001-2006, then-state Senator Bachmann proposed more than $60 million in earmarks, including a $710,000 “Bond For Centerville Local Improvements Around Highway 14″ and a $40,000,000 “Bond for Lino Lakes And Columbus Township Highway Interchanges.”
More In Link.
I bet they wished they vetted Palin. McCain got blindsided so badly with her. Oh well, she helped my side win.
Go America!
It's odd...the press did SUCH a good job vetting Obama, too. You know, asking hard-hitting questions like, "So, Senator Obama -- just exactly how awesome ARE you? The people demand to know!"Bachmann is in one week, the dirt starts surfacing. Palin has been putting up with this for 2 1/2 years. Still nothing. Bachmann is fixing to see the wrath of the liberal MSM and she will be looked at under a electron microscope. This is why Palin is going to come out shining because she has been vetted and has been vetted a second time and still, she has come out a winner. Romney has yet to be vetted like Palin. Same goes to Pawlenty but one thing is clear. There is something about a conservative woman that causes the media to go into search and destroy mode. Bachmann will be out of this race before you know it.
Michele Bachmann | Earmarks | Tea Party | The Daily Caller
Bachmann may also be plagued by her involvement in a controversial pardon. In 2007, Bachmann wrote a letter requesting a presidential pardon for a convicted drug-smuggler and money-launderer named Frank Vennes. Vennes was convicted of money laundering in 1988 and pleaded no contest to a cocaine and weapons charge. Making matters worse, he and his wife donated a total of $27,600 to Bachmanns 2006 and 2008 election.
Bachmanns penchant for earmarks dates back to her days in the Minnesota state Senate. Despite her reputation as a fiscal conservative, from 2001-2006, then-state Senator Bachmann proposed more than $60 million in earmarks, including a $710,000 Bond For Centerville Local Improvements Around Highway 14″ and a $40,000,000 Bond for Lino Lakes And Columbus Township Highway Interchanges.
More In Link.
I bet they wished they vetted Palin. McCain got blindsided so badly with her. Oh well, she helped my side win.
Go America!
Thats true. Somebody slipped- up when it came to vetting Bible Spice lol.
I think it's great that some people take in kids who wouldn't otherwise have any kind of real home. With that said, not everyone who does so has selfless motives for taking in foster kids. Personally, I would like to know more about the subject since 23 kids is a pretty high number. For example, did the kids just live with her for a short period of time, or did they live with her for years? How many foster kids lived in her home at one time? Was it five at a time, or ten at a time, or fifteen at a time?
Lacking any evidence there was any motive other than pure charity, why?
I didn't say that there was any evidence one way or another. However, 23 foster kids is a pretty high number, especially for someone who already has 5 kids. I don't know what her main motivation was. Maybe she had a financial motive. Maybe she had a religious motive. Maybe she had multiple motives. At this point, I'm kind of curious as to how much money the state paid her over time to take in 23 foster kids for however long they were living with her.
If you are denying that progressivism is a political process to effect change, and that process can be left or right wing, and that my examples are not so, then you are the liar.
Move along, snuffy, you have been snuffled yet again.
I'm sure it comforts your little leftist mind to feel that way, but no.
Go ask one of your fellow progressives if progressivism can be right-wing.
Still bitterly clinging to the erroneous notion that you're right, I see.If you are denying that progressivism is a political process to effect change, and that process can be left or right wing, and that my examples are not so, then you are the liar.
Move along, snuffy, you have been snuffled yet again.
I'm sure it comforts your little leftist mind to feel that way, but no.
Go ask one of your fellow progressives if progressivism can be right-wing.
Of course progressivism is both left and right, both conservative and liberal.. It is a process not an ideology. Ask your libertarian friends.
Still bitterly clinging to the erroneous notion that you're right, I see.I'm sure it comforts your little leftist mind to feel that way, but no.
Go ask one of your fellow progressives if progressivism can be right-wing.
Of course progressivism is both left and right, both conservative and liberal.. It is a process not an ideology. Ask your libertarian friends.