Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I didn't see the footnotes, I'll admit. If she was just referring to child pornography then I was incorrect in my OP.
That being said, the vow was written pretty poorly then. I read it originally as women and the future generation of this country later on, not today. Because why mention women and banning all forms of pornography in the same sentence if you mean to ban only child pornography?
But again, if the pledge refers to just child pornography, then I was incorrect in posting my OP and was wrong.
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
Human trafficking, child pornography and prostitution, pimping, sexual slavery and forced abortion are inherently coercive of vulnerable females.
i pledge to be against evil stuff and for good stuff. and to be for the children. vote for me.
I knew you had reading comprehension issues.
I'm simply telling you why I took it wrong in the first place. But hey, just feel free to ignore where I said that if they only mean child pornography then I was wrong with my OP.
I didn't see the footnotes, I'll admit. If she was just referring to child pornography then I was incorrect in my OP.
That being said, the vow was written pretty poorly then. I read it originally as women and the future generation of this country later on, not today. Because why mention women and banning all forms of pornography in the same sentence if you mean to ban only child pornography?
But again, if the pledge refers to just child pornography, then I was incorrect in posting my OP and was wrong.
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
i also pledge to be against shooting children in the face with a shotgun. that would be inherently coercive, and also, kind of wrong.
Human trafficking, child pornography and prostitution, pimping, sexual slavery and forced abortion are inherently coercive of vulnerable females.
i pledge to be against evil stuff and for good stuff. and to be for the children. vote for me.
i also pledge to be against shooting children in the face with a shotgun. that would be inherently coercive, and also, kind of wrong.
Why just children? Age bias!
I didn't see the footnotes, I'll admit. If she was just referring to child pornography then I was incorrect in my OP.
That being said, the vow was written pretty poorly then. I read it originally as women and the future generation of this country later on, not today. Because why mention women and banning all forms of pornography in the same sentence if you mean to ban only child pornography?
But again, if the pledge refers to just child pornography, then I was incorrect in posting my OP and was wrong.
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
protection FROM....not banning it
Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.
Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.
Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.
Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.
The question becomes why do they say "all forms of pornography" in the pledge, but cover their asses with the fine print? How many people who read that pledge are going to read the footnotes?
i also pledge to be against shooting children in the face with a shotgun. that would be inherently coercive, and also, kind of wrong.
Why just children? Age bias!
and why just the face? Location bias!
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
protection FROM....not banning it
Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.
Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.
Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.
Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.
how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?
huh?
confusion? oh hell no, red meat ? oh hell yeah. think progress is an advocacy site pure and simple, there are same- right left center......he took their headlines snippets and went with it, reading it the actual pledge becomes a simple lesson in comprehension, even when you hit the links, you get sent to think progress LBGT which mischaracterizes the vow, and the simple Iowa caucus's site that says she signed it.
I didn't see the footnotes, I'll admit. If she was just referring to child pornography then I was incorrect in my OP.
That being said, the vow was written pretty poorly then. I read it originally as women and the future generation of this country later on, not today. Because why mention women and banning all forms of pornography in the same sentence if you mean to ban only child pornography?
But again, if the pledge refers to just child pornography, then I was incorrect in posting my OP and was wrong.
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
protection FROM....not banning it
Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.
Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.
Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.
Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.
Don't listen to these partisan fuckwits. You didn't interpret anything incorrectly. Child porn is already illegal and no politicians anywhere are advocating for legalization. There'd be no need for any pledge about that whatsoever. That part of the pledge is definitely about supporting legislation that greatly restricts, if not outright bans "all forms of pornography" which as elvis pointed out, they didn't bother to define.
protection FROM....not banning it
Right now, there is no LEGAL protection from our children being exposed to pornography.
Yes, it is illegal to seel it to a minor....but it is not illegal for one to post it on the internet for a minor to easily see.
Personally, I disagree with her...let that be the job of the parents....but I will not sit by and allow you folks to intentionally misinterpret what she swore to.
Such spin is one of the reasons there is such a divide in America.
Jeez...stop the freaking game playing. It gets us nowhere as our politicians live the lives and and then the retirements of Riley.
how does a presidential candidate, in any elected or appointed capacity by which he or she may have the honor of serving her or his fellow citizens in these United States, accomplish said protection?
huh?
