Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Infanticide.
Innocent child killed by nationalized medicine and its handmaiden courts.
Just exactly what The Democrat Party of Death wants for ALL Americans.
Sad but true. Limited resources....and public interest. While much as been made about how much money Big Pharma spends and reaps from erectile dysfunction, it's not well known that they (and Uncle Sam) also spend more money on Breast Cancer research over Prostate Cancer by a factor of 2:1.Years ago my roommate's sister was diagnosed with some super rare condition and told she would live, at most, another 10 years. My response was that a cure might be found before that 10 years were up.
My roommate (whose entire family were scientists and highly educated) replied that her disease was too rare and no one was even looking for a cure. Reasearch is only interested in diseases which are common and which will result in a big payday when the cure is found. It simply costs too much money for research, the drug approval process, and clinical trials to bring it to market.
Charlie Gard was always going to die very young.
Thanks for reporting me. It reveals your character.Since the parents were Middle Class, the kid would have been dead as soon as the insurance money ran out if it'd been in America.Infanticide.
Innocent child killed by nationalized medicine and its handmaiden courts.
Just exactly what The Democrat Party of Death wants for ALL Americans.
How many here have run up against their limit on insurance or know someone who has? IRL, not the fucking Internet or "I heard from my sister's friend's cousin...."
WOOOOOSSSSSHHHHH!
Point is, Britain's Communist-Care would not allow the parents to opt out of their clutches and send the child to America where he might have gotten help - none of which would have been at government expense.
It's command-and-control medicine - the most deadly kind.
But I do understand why you liberals so love it.
It sucks knowing this child had a chance at life if he wasn't born in country that had socialized medical care.
For Profit Insurance companies would not have prevented the family from paying out of pocket for any treatment, experimental or otherwise. For profit insurance companies never had that power. Only the government has that power.It sucks knowing this child had a chance at life if he wasn't born in country that had socialized medical care.
Really? So you think "for profit" insurance companies would have shelled out millions of dollars for an experimental treatment that the doctors in the US have said would not have helped Charlie? Really???
For Profit Insurance companies would not have prevented the family from paying out of pocket for any treatment, experimental or otherwise. For profit insurance companies never had that power. Only the government has that power.It sucks knowing this child had a chance at life if he wasn't born in country that had socialized medical care.
Really? So you think "for profit" insurance companies would have shelled out millions of dollars for an experimental treatment that the doctors in the US have said would not have helped Charlie? Really???
Correct, it's pay-to-play for medicine. The problem for the Gard's was trying to raise the money then take the kid to the US. Meanwhile, the kid was spending money on socialized medicine. I don't know all the factors here, but I strongly doubt the Brits just wanted to kill the kid.For Profit Insurance companies would not have prevented the family from paying out of pocket for any treatment, experimental or otherwise. For profit insurance companies never had that power. Only the government has that power.It sucks knowing this child had a chance at life if he wasn't born in country that had socialized medical care.
Really? So you think "for profit" insurance companies would have shelled out millions of dollars for an experimental treatment that the doctors in the US have said would not have helped Charlie? Really???
The kid was doomed from the start since there was no cure; only an experimental treatment that may have extended his life.For Profit Insurance companies would not have prevented the family from paying out of pocket for any treatment, experimental or otherwise. For profit insurance companies never had that power. Only the government has that power.It sucks knowing this child had a chance at life if he wasn't born in country that had socialized medical care.
Really? So you think "for profit" insurance companies would have shelled out millions of dollars for an experimental treatment that the doctors in the US have said would not have helped Charlie? Really???
Ok, so bitch about the gov't overstepping their bounds. But don't blame it on socialized medicine.
The Brits? WTF? Why would they want to kill a child?They just wanted to kill the child. When ever there is a denial of medical care, where that care would have been paid for, it's some sort of perverse need to just end that too much trouble life.
They just wanted to kill the child. When ever there is a denial of medical care, where that care would have been paid for, it's some sort of perverse need to just end that too much trouble life.
They just wanted to kill the child. When ever there is a denial of medical care, where that care would have been paid for, it's some sort of perverse need to just end that too much trouble life.
They just wanted to kill the child. When ever there is a denial of medical care, where that care would have been paid for, it's some sort of perverse need to just end that too much trouble life.
Sarah has a death panel she uses?This is the Death Panel Sarah Palin spoke of.....
I thought God would heal the child, did anyone ask him?They just wanted to kill the child. When ever there is a denial of medical care, where that care would have been paid for, it's some sort of perverse need to just end that too much trouble life.
Like it or not, a human life has an economic value, and there will always be times when it is appropriate to stop the efforts to artificially extend the term of a life and let nature take its course. Although this particular little kid had funding in place, spending it to extend his value-less life would be a travesty. Take that money and do a couple thousand immunizations, or feed the hungry, or find shelter for some homeless people.
No expense or sacrifice is too great for the people who don't have to pay it.
Private insurance companies have cut people off of healthcare services because of expense....So you just can't win no matter how much you scream...Like it or not, a human life has an economic value, and there will always be times when it is appropriate to stop the efforts to artificially extend the term of a life and let nature take its course. Although this particular little kid had funding in place, spending it to extend his value-less life would be a travesty. Take that money and do a couple thousand immunizations, or feed the hungry, or find shelter for some homeless people.
No expense or sacrifice is too great for the people who don't have to pay it.
This is the reason I wanted govt. out of healthcare. Nobody should be viewed as a line item to be cut off by heartless demagogues. We have rights. Charlie had rights. And the govt took a shotgun to them.