daveman
Diamond Member
It's #3 that's giving them fits.She practiced what she preached in this context. She didn't think it was a good idea but since she was forced to live under the rules defined by someone else she did.
I didn't want to pay for the new road in front of my house. The time to object was at the planning meeting. Once overruled I still sent the extra tax assessment in and I still drive on it every time I enter or leave my driveway.
i'm sorry, i wasn't aware that not cashing SS checks was illegal.
fail
Money she didn't want to give was taken from her. Some of that money was then returned to her in the form of checks that she was then legally allowed to cash. The premise was the government shouldn't have taken so much in the first place, but there's nothing hypocritical with accepting what was given back to her.
Here are the rules:
1. Money is taken away from people who object to the amount, means, scope and reason.
2. The entity taking it away sometimes gives some back, clearly marked as theirs.
3. The premise is that it was theirs to start with.