Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you kidding? Did you even read that article?Disinformation that Republicans love:
Except that even MSNBC acknowledged that large cache's of WMD's (specifically chemical weapons) were in fact found in Iraq [MENTION=45917]KNB[/MENTION]. It's ok though KNB - don't feel bad. We've come to expect blind ignorance from you Dumbocrats. Since you never leave your left-wing propaganda "comfort food" websites, we honestly don't expect you to be informed or aware of what is actually happening in the world.
However, for anyone on this site who is not a left-wing partisan hack, please enjoy these facts below which were so undeniable, even MSNBC was forced to report on them eek:
From Chuck Pfarerr's book, Seal Target: Geronimo
It is a chilling fact that thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq. These weapons have been used by Al Qaeda against coalition and NATO forces on dozens of occasions. This has been confirmed by countless sources, most recently in the released WikiLeaks cables.
So why haven't the American people been told of the stock-piled caches of chemical WMD's uncovered in Iraq or of the chemical weapon attacks by Al Qaeda?
The Republicans wont touch this because it would reveal the incompetence of the Bush administration in failing to neutralize the danger of Iraqi WMD (instead of preventing Weapons of Mass Destruction from falling into the hands of terrorists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq has accelerated the acquisition, manufacture, and use of chemical weapons by Al Qaeda). The Democrats wont touch it because it would show President Bush was right to invade Iraq in the first place. It is an axis of embarrassment. And the press won't touch it because they had already convinced themselves, and most of the American public, that Saddam Hussein didnt have any WMD's. The media turned a blind eye to continued reports of chemical weapon attacks because its own credibility was threatened. Several major outlets were deeply invested with the story line of an unjustifiable war". Not many people can bear to admit they were wrong, especially in print, and especially if they have been very wrong for a very long time.
Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq | NBC News
NewsMax Archives
*Note that I have 4 sources here all confirming the same information - two links to major news outlets - including one which is a radical left-wing propaganda machine for the Dumbocrats - plus I cited a book with the exact title and author and that book cites the WikiLeaks cables which are classified government documents.
Game. Set. Match, junior.....
Field-test results could be in error
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the results were from a field test, which can be imperfect, and more analysis needed to be done. We have to be careful, he told an audience in Washington Monday afternoon.
Rumsfeld said it may take some time to determine precisely what the chemical was.
Two former weapons inspectors Hans Blix and David Kay said the shell was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons.
Kimmitt said he believed that insurgents who planted the explosive didnt know it contained the nerve agent.
Very small dispersal
He said the bomb exploded a couple of days ago in the Iraqi capital and resulted in very small dispersal of the nerve agent.
The Iraqi Survey Group confirmed today that a 155-millimeter artillery round containing sarin nerve agent had been found, said Kimmitt, the chief military spokesman in Iraq. The round had been rigged as an IED [improvised explosive device] which was discovered by a U.S. force convoy.
Sarin-loaded bomb explodes in Iraq - World news - Mideast/N. Africa - Conflict in Iraq | NBC News
No serious injuries, and the terrorists didn't even know what kind of bomb they had. One report. That's ONE instance. Where are all of these other "thousands of cases" where chemical weapons were used against American soldiers?
oh well...glen Beck has achieved more than you so don't be haten and put your claws in
not everyone get their information off the Hufferpufferpost, salon, thinkprogress, etc
You know, there are meds you can take for that problem of yours.
If there was a disinformation campaign...it ain't working. Wasn't there a thread yesterday about Obama's ratings being lower than at any other point in his administration?
Rotty is starting his 40 proof weekend early
Where were "thousands" of chemical weapons discovered in Iraq? "THOUSANDS" of chemical weapons had been discovered? Where? Why weren't they mentioned in the Duelfer report? Why weren't there any mention of them anywhere? And if there were so many chemical munitions there, why was only one used during the war?There is a HUGE difference between chemical weapons being "used against our soldiers" (direct quote from you) thousands of times and what the author said which was "thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq" (again, a direct quote - this time from the author).
It's called reading comprehension my friend.
"Obama Administration involved in a Soviet-style disinformation campaign"
Nope, far from it.
Where were "thousands" of chemical weapons discovered in Iraq? "THOUSANDS" of chemical weapons had been discovered? Where? Why weren't they mentioned in the Duelfer report? Why weren't there any mention of them anywhere? And if there were so many chemical munitions there, why was only one used during the war?There is a HUGE difference between chemical weapons being "used against our soldiers" (direct quote from you) thousands of times and what the author said which was "thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq" (again, a direct quote - this time from the author).
It's called reading comprehension my friend.
U.S. Intelligence and Iraq WMD
No real shock here though as the left has always been about lies. In fact, the Nazis studied Woodrow Wilson to master propagand...
The danger of disinformation is that it comes from within, which disrupts cultural norms and trust in a way that is irreparable. During the Cold War, the Soviets worked to infiltrate ‘trusted’ sources around the world to begin to plant those seeds of doubt.
“The worst harm is implanting false ideas. You implant doubt, cause people to question their values, their beliefs by tearing down Western values, you create a vacuum that allows Marxist thought to expand,” Rychlak told Glenn. “When you know it is coming from your enemy, you don’t trust it. If they can get it to come from the United States, if it comes from Washington, if it comes from The New York Times or one of those sources, people tended to believe it. We are starting to be suspicious of those [sources] today, but they tried to intentionally implant false ideas into trusted sources [at the time].”
Author explains how the Obama Administration is involved in a Soviet-style disinformation campaign
You know, there are meds you can take for that problem of yours.
If there was a disinformation campaign...it ain't working. Wasn't there a thread yesterday about Obama's ratings being lower than at any other point in his administration?
Rotty is starting his 40 proof weekend early
Well that's just it CC - "it ain't working" (hence his miserable approval ratings). Thankfully there are enough people (such as Snowden) who are leaking the truth about Obama and his regime.
By the way - I didn't write this article. I simply shared it. If you have to attack the messenger, that pretty much means you can't deny the message...
Where were "thousands" of chemical weapons discovered in Iraq? "THOUSANDS" of chemical weapons had been discovered? Where? Why weren't they mentioned in the Duelfer report? Why weren't there any mention of them anywhere? And if there were so many chemical munitions there, why was only one used during the war?There is a HUGE difference between chemical weapons being "used against our soldiers" (direct quote from you) thousands of times and what the author said which was "thousands of chemical weapons have been uncovered in Iraq" (again, a direct quote - this time from the author).
It's called reading comprehension my friend.
U.S. Intelligence and Iraq WMD
One guy wrote a book that says there were "thousands" of chemical weapons found in Iraq so it must be true, even though there's nothing about that in the National Security Archives.
"In Iraq" is not an answer. Cite the Wikileaks cables. Where on all of the internet is a single documented report about "thousands" of WMD being found in Iraq?
One link. Just put up one credible link to the specific Wikileaks cables which say that stockpiles of "thousands" of chemical weapons were captured in Iraq.
the article is from glen beck... lmao...
the "author" is Ron Rychlak who should probably stick to writing about the wonders of the papacy
oh well...glen Beck has achieved more than you so don't be haten and put your claws in
not everyone get their information off the Hufferpufferpost, salon, thinkprogress, etc
You know, there are meds you can take for that problem of yours.
You've put up four citations to the same bullshit. If Iraq had so many "thousands" of chemical munitions, then why were so few used during the war? And according to those wikileaks cables and every other government report, most of the rounds that were discovered were leftover from before the 1991 Gulf War (from the 1980s, guess who was supporting Saddam Hussein in the 1980s) not in weapon-ready condition and did not pose an "imminent threat" like the Bush administration said.
There was nothing in Iraq that posed a threat to the United States of America.